Value
6.3/10data confidence 83%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 0.9 |
| P/S | 10.0 |
| EV/EBITDA | 10.0 |
| Fwd P/E | 1.7 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 63.3x
- ▸PEG: 0.32
IMOS · Why this verdict
Why ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES (IMOS) is rated SELL
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Show full disclosure ▾Hide full disclosure ▴
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
VerdictSELL
Overall score5.4/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
Thesis pillars
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Revenue is growing at 25% year over year, a high-conviction growth signal that, if sustained, could drive meaningful earnings expansion and justify a re-rating of the shares. Growth breakdown | Revenue growth stays above 15% YoY for the next 2 consecutive reported quarters. | →Stable |
| CounterSemiconductor and assembly-services revenue is highly cyclical; a 25% growth rate in an upcycle may mean-revert sharply if end-market demand softens or inventory builds, making the current rate a poor predictor of through-cycle earnings power. | ||
Free cash flow is negative at -28% of net income, meaning reported earnings are not being converted into cash — a red flag that earnings quality may be overstated relative to the underlying cash generation of the business. Quality breakdown | FCF to net income ratio remains negative over the next 4 reported quarters, confirming a structural quality gap rather than a transient cycle effect. | →Stable |
| CounterA negative FCF-to-NI ratio can reflect a growth investment cycle — capital expenditure above depreciation during rapid expansion — rather than a structural earnings quality problem; if the investment is productive, future free cash flow should recover. | ||
The earnings record shows 2 beats and 2 misses across the past 4 reported quarters, with wide variance in surprise magnitude, indicating inconsistent ability to meet or exceed consensus expectations. Earnings | EPS beats outpace misses for 3 consecutive reported quarters, signaling an improvement in earnings predictability. | →Stable |
| CounterThe most recent reported quarter delivered a 111.8% positive surprise — the largest single beat in the historical record — suggesting that when execution improves it can be significant, and the 2 misses may reflect lumpy timing rather than a systematic shortfall. | ||
The quality score at 3.3 falls below the 4.0 minimum threshold, reflecting weak return metrics and a negative cash conversion profile that together undermine confidence in the durability of reported earnings. Warnings | Quality score recovers above 4.0 for 2 consecutive reported quarters, signaling a genuine improvement in the earnings quality profile. | →Stable |
| CounterA strong Piotroski F-Score of 8 out of 9 — one of the highest possible readings on financial health — indicates broad-based operational soundness across liquidity, leverage, and efficiency measures, suggesting the quality floor breach is driven by specific metrics rather than systemic deterioration. | ||
Revenue is growing at 25% year over year, a high-conviction growth signal that, if sustained, could drive meaningful earnings expansion and justify a re-rating of the shares.
→StableGrowth breakdown
- Expectation
- Revenue growth stays above 15% YoY for the next 2 consecutive reported quarters.
CounterSemiconductor and assembly-services revenue is highly cyclical; a 25% growth rate in an upcycle may mean-revert sharply if end-market demand softens or inventory builds, making the current rate a poor predictor of through-cycle earnings power.
Free cash flow is negative at -28% of net income, meaning reported earnings are not being converted into cash — a red flag that earnings quality may be overstated relative to the underlying cash generation of the business.
→StableQuality breakdown
- Expectation
- FCF to net income ratio remains negative over the next 4 reported quarters, confirming a structural quality gap rather than a transient cycle effect.
CounterA negative FCF-to-NI ratio can reflect a growth investment cycle — capital expenditure above depreciation during rapid expansion — rather than a structural earnings quality problem; if the investment is productive, future free cash flow should recover.
The earnings record shows 2 beats and 2 misses across the past 4 reported quarters, with wide variance in surprise magnitude, indicating inconsistent ability to meet or exceed consensus expectations.
→StableEarnings
- Expectation
- EPS beats outpace misses for 3 consecutive reported quarters, signaling an improvement in earnings predictability.
CounterThe most recent reported quarter delivered a 111.8% positive surprise — the largest single beat in the historical record — suggesting that when execution improves it can be significant, and the 2 misses may reflect lumpy timing rather than a systematic shortfall.
The quality score at 3.3 falls below the 4.0 minimum threshold, reflecting weak return metrics and a negative cash conversion profile that together undermine confidence in the durability of reported earnings.
→StableWarnings
- Expectation
- Quality score recovers above 4.0 for 2 consecutive reported quarters, signaling a genuine improvement in the earnings quality profile.
CounterA strong Piotroski F-Score of 8 out of 9 — one of the highest possible readings on financial health — indicates broad-based operational soundness across liquidity, leverage, and efficiency measures, suggesting the quality floor breach is driven by specific metrics rather than systemic deterioration.
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis
Engine thesis — one sentence
ChipMOS Technologies is growing revenue at 25% year over year, but free cash flow is negative relative to net income and the quality score falls below the minimum floor, creating tension between a compelling growth profile and materially impaired earnings quality.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
Per-dimension breakdown
Quality
3.3/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 1.1 |
| ROA | 1.5 |
| Gross margin | 0.0 |
| Op margin | 3.0 |
| Net margin | 1.6 |
| Current ratio | 8.3 |
| FCF quality | 0.0 |
| Moat | 5.6 |
| Piotroski F | 8.9 |
- ▸Earnings quality RED FLAG: -28% FCF/NI
- ▸Strong Piotroski F-Score: 8/9
Growth
9.4/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 8.8 |
| EPS growth | 10.0 |
- ▸Strong growth: 25% YoY
Momentum
4.7/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 5.5 |
| MACD | 0.5 |
| OBV | 4.8 |
| MA position | 9.0 |
| Volume | 3.8 |
- ▸Above 200-day MA
Sentiment
4.3/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| LLM sentiment | 3.5 |
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
Insider
5.0/10data confidence 50%Peer rank
3.9/10data confidence 80%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 6.7 |
| quality rank | 3.6 |
| growth rank | 5.5 |
Technical
4.9/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 3.1 |
| support resistance | 4.6 |
| 52w position | 7.8 |
| gap | 4.0 |
Risk (lower is worse)
5.2/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 9.9 |
| days to cover | 10.0 |
| volatility | 0.0 |
| put call | 3.8 |
| implied vol | 0.0 |
| beta | 5.9 |
| debt equity | 7.1 |
| news risk | 5.0 |
- ▸High IV: 166%
Catalyst
4.8/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 3.5 |
| earnings history | 3.3 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 5.5 |
| dividend safety | 3.5 |
| news activity | 8.0 |
- ▸Earnings concerns: 2B/2M
- ▸Yield trap warning: high yield but unsafe
How the verdict was assembled
Engine trigger
Quality below minimum threshold.
Engine technical detail
verdict_path:
L1:HARD_BLOCKPassed (7)
- MOMENTUM:4.7>=4.5
- INSIDER:OK
- 8K:CLEAN
- NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
- EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:39d clear
- SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
- MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (0)
none
Warning (2)
- MOMENTUM:4.7<5.5 (soft — BUY_NOW allowed but watch)
- ASYMMETRY:UPSIDE_EXHAUSTED (upside=0.0%)
Reward-to-Risk
0.00
Upside
+0.0%
Downside
14.9%
Sizing output
AVOID
SetupRange Bound — RSI 51 mid-range, Bollinger mid-band
EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityAggressive — MCap $2.2B<$5B
Investment implication
The L1 gate blocked the positive-verdict path: a hard-floor threshold was breached, so dimensional pillars — including Growth at 9.4 could not lift the engine output above the verdict floor.
The strongest dimensions are Growth at 9.4, Value at 6.3, and Risk (lower is worse) at 5.2; the weakest are Quality at 3.3, Peer rank at 3.9, and Sentiment at 4.3. The V9 engine cleared all gates with 2 warnings, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 0.00 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
What would invalidate the thesis
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
- P1Strong Revenue Growth Momentum
Trip ifRevenue growth falls below 10% YoY for 2 consecutive reported quarters.
- P2Negative Free Cash Flow Quality Gap
Trip ifFree cash flow rises above $0 for 2 consecutive reported quarters.
- P3Mixed Earnings Execution
Trip ifEPS surprise exceeds 0% for 3 consecutive reported quarters.
- P4Quality Below Minimum Floor
Trip ifQuality score rises above 4.0 for 2 consecutive reported quarters.