Value
4.2/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 4.9 |
| P/S | 7.0 |
| EV/EBITDA | 0.5 |
| Fwd P/E | 5.8 |
| PEG | 4.1 |
| Analyst target | 3.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 22.2x
- ▸PEG: 2.37
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
The stock is trading above its resistance-based price target, leaving the projected return negative — the implied downside from current levels exceeds the implied upside, making new buying unattractive regardless of the underlying business quality. Price targets | The analyst consensus price target is revised above $155 within 2 quarters, restoring meaningful positive headroom from the current price. | →Stable |
| CounterRegulated utilities can trade through resistance levels for extended periods when rate cases progress favorably; the positive price momentum and rising volume-accumulation pattern may sustain the premium until the next catalyst re-anchors the target higher. | ||
The business derives roughly 95% of its revenue from Idaho, creating binary exposure to a single state regulator — an adverse rate determination from that commission could materially compress authorized returns with no geographic diversification to absorb the impact. Bear case | Revenue growth turns positive year-over-year for 2 consecutive quarters, demonstrating that Idaho regulatory outcomes are not impeding earnings generation. | →Stable |
| CounterRegulated utilities typically maintain constructive, long-standing regulatory relationships; a compact single-jurisdiction footprint may also simplify capital planning and reduce the complexity burden that multi-state peers carry. | ||
Free cash flow is deeply negative — running at negative 314% relative to net income — meaning the business is not converting reported earnings into cash, which raises questions about both dividend sustainability and long-term capital structure. Quality breakdown | The FCF-to-net-income ratio rises above negative 100% for 2 consecutive quarters, indicating the gap between reported earnings and actual cash generation is closing. | →Stable |
| CounterCapital-intensive regulated utility infrastructure programs routinely produce negative near-term free cash flow during elevated build-out phases; if the investment cycle peaks, cash conversion can recover sharply and be supported by rate base growth. | ||
The dividend yield carries an explicit warning that the payout may be unsafe — a concern compounded by the deeply negative free cash flow — making income-oriented holding at a price above the resistance target a doubly unfavorable position. Catalyst breakdown | Dividend payout ratio falls below 100% on a free-cash-flow basis for 2 consecutive quarters, confirming the payout is covered by actual cash generation. | →Stable |
| CounterRegulated utilities can sustain dividends through debt financing during capital-intensive build periods, and a constructive rate case approval could restore cash coverage sooner than the market currently expects. | ||
CounterRegulated utilities can trade through resistance levels for extended periods when rate cases progress favorably; the positive price momentum and rising volume-accumulation pattern may sustain the premium until the next catalyst re-anchors the target higher.
CounterRegulated utilities typically maintain constructive, long-standing regulatory relationships; a compact single-jurisdiction footprint may also simplify capital planning and reduce the complexity burden that multi-state peers carry.
CounterCapital-intensive regulated utility infrastructure programs routinely produce negative near-term free cash flow during elevated build-out phases; if the investment cycle peaks, cash conversion can recover sharply and be supported by rate base growth.
CounterRegulated utilities can sustain dividends through debt financing during capital-intensive build periods, and a constructive rate case approval could restore cash coverage sooner than the market currently expects.
IDACORP sits above its resistance-based price target with negative risk/reward, deeply negative free cash flow, a potentially unsafe dividend, and near-total dependence on a single state regulator — the setup favors patience rather than adding exposure at current levels.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 4.9 |
| P/S | 7.0 |
| EV/EBITDA | 0.5 |
| Fwd P/E | 5.8 |
| PEG | 4.1 |
| Analyst target | 3.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 3.2 |
| ROA | 1.5 |
| Gross margin | 3.5 |
| Op margin | 7.9 |
| Net margin | 9.3 |
| Current ratio | 4.6 |
| FCF quality | 0.0 |
| Moat | 3.9 |
| Piotroski F | 6.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 0.8 |
| EPS growth | 4.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 4.5 |
| MACD | 10.0 |
| OBV | 10.0 |
| MA position | 9.0 |
| Volume | 0.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 7.0 |
| Price target | 5.1 |
| erm sentiment | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 5.1 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 0.8 |
| quality rank | 6.1 |
| growth rank | 0.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 1.8 |
| support resistance | 1.2 |
| 52w position | 9.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 4.7 |
| days to cover | 1.9 |
| volatility | 7.8 |
| put call | 10.0 |
| implied vol | 4.4 |
| beta | 10.0 |
| debt equity | 4.8 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 5.6 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 4.5 |
| dividend safety | 4.8 |
Multiple concerning factors. Consider reducing position.
L4:PATH_F_SELLnone
Setup— — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed
EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityModerate — Balanced profile
The F-path SELL output reflects an overall score of 4.0 below the 5.6 soft trigger — multiple weakening dimensions accumulated rather than a single hard-floor breach. The strongest dimension ( Momentum at 6.7) was not enough to lift the adjusted overall above the threshold. Co-occurring failed gates ( ASYMMETRY:-1.3=NEGATIVE) reinforce the read. Current asymmetry R:R is -1.28 — supplementary context, not the trigger for this path.
The strongest dimensions are Momentum at 6.7, Risk (lower is worse) at 6.2, and Sentiment at 5.8; the weakest are Growth at 2.4, Peer rank at 3.0, and Technical at 4.2. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -1.28 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifAnalyst consensus price target rises above $155 (the current options max-pain level), restoring more than 8% upside headroom from current price levels.
Trip ifRevenue growth exceeds 0% year-over-year for 2 consecutive quarters, reversing the current negative 7% trajectory.
Trip ifFCF-to-net-income ratio rises above negative 100% for 2 consecutive quarters, indicating material improvement in cash conversion.
Trip ifDividend payout ratio falls below 100% on a free-cash-flow basis for 2 consecutive fiscal quarters, removing the yield-trap warning.