Value
8.0/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 7.0 |
| P/S | 9.5 |
| EV/EBITDA | 7.0 |
| Fwd P/E | 9.1 |
| PEG | 7.8 |
| Analyst target | 7.5 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 11.2x
- ▸PEG: 0.86
- ▸Attractively valued
HAL · Why this verdict
Why Halliburton (HAL) is rated HOLD
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Show full disclosure ▾Hide full disclosure ▴
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
VerdictHOLD
Overall score5.8/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
Thesis pillars
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Free cash flow conversion stands at 132% of net income — meaning the business generates more cash than it reports in earnings — indicating high earnings quality and disciplined working-capital management. Quality breakdown | FCF conversion remains above 100% of net income over the next 2 fiscal years. | →Stable |
| CounterThere is no identified competitive moat, meaning cash generation depends on oilfield services pricing dynamics that can compress rapidly in a demand downturn; the current conversion rate could reverse on any significant increase in capital maintenance requirements. | ||
With only 4.3% headroom to the analyst price target and a reward-to-risk ratio of 1.3-to-1 that falls short of the 1.5-to-1 minimum, the current entry geometry is too narrow to justify deploying new capital, even though the underlying business quality is sound. Warnings | A pullback to a level offering at least 10% upside to the analyst target would restore a more compelling reward-to-risk profile. | →Stable |
| CounterContinued earnings beats could drive upward analyst target revisions, making the current 4.3% gap a transient floor rather than a ceiling; waiting for a pullback risks missing an upward re-rating. | ||
The company has beaten consensus earnings estimates in each of the three most recent quarters, delivering an average positive surprise of roughly 13% after a single in-line quarter in the oldest period of the trailing year — a pattern that suggests management is consistently under-promising and over-delivering. Earnings | Average EPS surprise remains above 5% over the next 4 reported quarters, sustaining the beat pattern. | →Stable |
| CounterRevenue is effectively flat year-over-year, indicating the beat streak reflects cost discipline rather than demand growth; a reversal in field-service margins or a step-up in overhead could end the pattern without a revenue tailwind to offset it. | ||
A forward P/E of 13.1x combined with a PEG ratio of 1.0 implies the market is paying roughly one turn of multiple per unit of growth — a relationship that looks attractive for an energy-services business with a positive earnings trajectory. Valuation breakdown | Forward P/E expands toward 15x as consensus estimate revisions follow continued beats over the next 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterFlat revenue growth provides little fundamental catalyst for multiple expansion; a 13x forward multiple may accurately reflect the cyclical risk inherent in oilfield services rather than represent a discount awaiting closure. | ||
Free cash flow conversion stands at 132% of net income — meaning the business generates more cash than it reports in earnings — indicating high earnings quality and disciplined working-capital management.
→StableQuality breakdown
- Expectation
- FCF conversion remains above 100% of net income over the next 2 fiscal years.
CounterThere is no identified competitive moat, meaning cash generation depends on oilfield services pricing dynamics that can compress rapidly in a demand downturn; the current conversion rate could reverse on any significant increase in capital maintenance requirements.
With only 4.3% headroom to the analyst price target and a reward-to-risk ratio of 1.3-to-1 that falls short of the 1.5-to-1 minimum, the current entry geometry is too narrow to justify deploying new capital, even though the underlying business quality is sound.
→StableWarnings
- Expectation
- A pullback to a level offering at least 10% upside to the analyst target would restore a more compelling reward-to-risk profile.
CounterContinued earnings beats could drive upward analyst target revisions, making the current 4.3% gap a transient floor rather than a ceiling; waiting for a pullback risks missing an upward re-rating.
The company has beaten consensus earnings estimates in each of the three most recent quarters, delivering an average positive surprise of roughly 13% after a single in-line quarter in the oldest period of the trailing year — a pattern that suggests management is consistently under-promising and over-delivering.
→StableEarnings
- Expectation
- Average EPS surprise remains above 5% over the next 4 reported quarters, sustaining the beat pattern.
CounterRevenue is effectively flat year-over-year, indicating the beat streak reflects cost discipline rather than demand growth; a reversal in field-service margins or a step-up in overhead could end the pattern without a revenue tailwind to offset it.
A forward P/E of 13.1x combined with a PEG ratio of 1.0 implies the market is paying roughly one turn of multiple per unit of growth — a relationship that looks attractive for an energy-services business with a positive earnings trajectory.
→StableValuation breakdown
- Expectation
- Forward P/E expands toward 15x as consensus estimate revisions follow continued beats over the next 12 months.
CounterFlat revenue growth provides little fundamental catalyst for multiple expansion; a 13x forward multiple may accurately reflect the cyclical risk inherent in oilfield services rather than represent a discount awaiting closure.
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis
Engine thesis — one sentence
Halliburton has beaten consensus earnings estimates in each of the three most recent quarters at an average positive surprise of roughly 13%, trades at a forward P/E of 13.1x with a PEG of 1.0, and converts earnings to free cash flow at 132% — but with only 4.3% headroom to the analyst target and a reward-to-risk ratio below the 1.5-to-1 threshold, the setup favors patience over new capital deployment at the current price.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
Per-dimension breakdown
Quality
5.2/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 4.9 |
| ROA | 4.9 |
| Gross margin | 0.0 |
| Op margin | 5.0 |
| Net margin | 3.5 |
| Current ratio | 7.2 |
| FCF quality | 9.4 |
| Moat | 4.4 |
| Piotroski F | 7.8 |
- ▸Excellent cash conversion: 132% FCF/NI
- ▸No competitive moat
- ▸Strong Piotroski F-Score: 7/9
Growth
6.2/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 2.4 |
| EPS growth | 10.0 |
- ▸Declining revenue: -0%
Momentum
2.8/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 8.7 |
| MACD | 0.3 |
| OBV | 1.0 |
| MA position | 4.0 |
| Volume | 0.0 |
- ▸Oversold in uptrend (RSI 19)
- ▸Volume distribution (falling OBV)
- ▸Above 200-day MA
Sentiment
7.0/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| LLM sentiment | 5.0 |
| Analyst rating | 7.5 |
| Price target | 8.7 |
- ▸Analyst upside: 32%
Insider
3.9/10data confidence 75%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 4.5 |
| insider conviction | 2.0 |
| holder change | 5.1 |
- ▸Modest insider selling — $10,550,606 (0.038% of mkt cap)
Peer rank
4.2/10data confidence 80%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 6.8 |
| quality rank | 6.6 |
| growth rank | 3.3 |
Technical
7.3/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 7.4 |
| support resistance | 9.0 |
| 52w position | 5.4 |
Risk (lower is worse)
6.9/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 7.3 |
| days to cover | 8.0 |
| volatility | 4.9 |
| put call | 8.1 |
| implied vol | 4.9 |
| beta | 8.7 |
| debt equity | 6.5 |
Catalyst
7.0/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 10.0 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 9.1 |
| dividend safety | 7.0 |
| news activity | 6.0 |
- ▸Strong earnings: 3B/0M
- ▸Dividend: 206.0%
How the verdict was assembled
Engine trigger
Maintain position. Not compelling to add more.
Engine technical detail
verdict_path:
L4:PATH_F_HOLDPassed (6)
- ASYMMETRY:3.1>=1.5
- INSIDER:OK
- 8K:CLEAN
- EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:15d clear
- SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
- MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (1)
- MOMENTUM:2.8<4.5
Warning (0)
none
Reward-to-Risk
3.11
Upside
+18.9%
Downside
6.1%
Sizing output
AVOID
Setup— — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed
EdgeCatalyst-Driven — Earnings in 15d with 3/4 beat streak
SuitabilityModerate — Balanced profile
Investment implication
None of the engine's positive-conviction paths (C-quality, D-momentum) triggered — the F-path HOLD reflects balanced signals. Strongest-cleared gate: ASYMMETRY:3.1>=1.5. Top dim: Value at 8.0; weakest: Momentum at 2.8. No conviction either direction.
The strongest dimensions are Value at 8.0, Technical at 7.3, and Sentiment at 7.0; the weakest are Momentum at 2.8, Insider at 3.9, and Peer rank at 4.2. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 3.11 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
What would invalidate the thesis
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
- P1Earnings Execution Consistency
Trip ifEPS surprise falls below 0% for 2 consecutive quarters.
- P2Valuation Attractive At Peg One
Trip ifForward P/E compresses below 9x for 2 consecutive quarters without a corresponding decline in earnings estimates.
- P3Superior Free Cash Flow Conversion
Trip ifFCF/NI ratio falls below 80% for 2 consecutive quarters.
- P4Thin Upside Limits New Entry
Trip ifAnalyst consensus price target rises above $46, expanding upside to more than 20% from the current price and improving the reward-to-risk ratio above 1.5-to-1.