Value
4.0/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 3.5 |
| P/S | 8.0 |
| EV/EBITDA | 0.0 |
| Fwd P/E | 4.7 |
| PEG | 4.4 |
| Analyst target | 3.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 26.6x
- ▸PEG: 2.10
GWW · Why this verdict
Why W.W. Grainger (GWW) is rated SELL
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Show full disclosure ▾Hide full disclosure ▴
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
VerdictSELL
Overall score5.3/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
Thesis pillars
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
The company carries a wide economic moat, a near-perfect financial health score of 9 out of 9, and returns on equity and assets that rank superior to sector peers — characteristics that mark it as a durable compounding business in industrial distribution. Quality breakdown | Return on equity stays above 35% and the financial health score remains at 8 or higher out of 9 over the next four quarters, confirming the durability of the quality franchise. | →Stable |
| CounterThe elevated return on equity is amplified by a buyback-reduced equity base; if capital returns slow or margins narrow even modestly, the headline quality figures could deteriorate faster than the underlying competitive position. | ||
With only about 0.7% of headroom remaining to the near-term price target and a risk-to-reward ratio of approximately 0.18-to-1, the current setup offers minimal potential gain relative to the downside, making a new or increased position difficult to justify at these levels. Price targets | The investment case improves only if the price target is revised materially higher, with implied upside expanding above 15% and the reward-to-risk ratio recovering above 1.5-to-1. | →Stable |
| CounterA high-quality franchise at a stretched near-term level can still be a core holding if the compounding trajectory warrants a higher multiple; the current target may prove conservative if earnings growth accelerates. | ||
The company delivered two earnings misses over the past four quarters with average reported surprises close to flat, suggesting the previous run of clean outperformance has moderated into a more uncertain delivery pattern. Earnings | EPS beats return in each of the next 2 consecutive quarters with positive surprises above 3%, restoring the consistency the quality profile implies. | →Stable |
| CounterTwo misses in an uncertain industrial demand environment may reflect timing rather than structural deterioration; if end-market demand firms, earnings could snap back sharply to a more consistent cadence. | ||
The RSI has reached 74, flagging overbought conditions, while on-balance volume is trending lower even as price pushes near 52-week highs — a divergence between price and volume that often signals distribution near a near-term peak. Momentum breakdown | RSI retreats below 60 and on-balance volume turns to a rising trend for at least 4 consecutive weeks, resolving the current technical divergence. | →Stable |
| CounterStrong franchise names can sustain overbought RSI readings for extended periods during institutional accumulation phases; a high RSI alone is insufficient to predict a near-term reversal when quality fundamentals underpin demand. | ||
The company carries a wide economic moat, a near-perfect financial health score of 9 out of 9, and returns on equity and assets that rank superior to sector peers — characteristics that mark it as a durable compounding business in industrial distribution.
→StableQuality breakdown
- Expectation
- Return on equity stays above 35% and the financial health score remains at 8 or higher out of 9 over the next four quarters, confirming the durability of the quality franchise.
CounterThe elevated return on equity is amplified by a buyback-reduced equity base; if capital returns slow or margins narrow even modestly, the headline quality figures could deteriorate faster than the underlying competitive position.
With only about 0.7% of headroom remaining to the near-term price target and a risk-to-reward ratio of approximately 0.18-to-1, the current setup offers minimal potential gain relative to the downside, making a new or increased position difficult to justify at these levels.
→StablePrice targets
- Expectation
- The investment case improves only if the price target is revised materially higher, with implied upside expanding above 15% and the reward-to-risk ratio recovering above 1.5-to-1.
CounterA high-quality franchise at a stretched near-term level can still be a core holding if the compounding trajectory warrants a higher multiple; the current target may prove conservative if earnings growth accelerates.
The company delivered two earnings misses over the past four quarters with average reported surprises close to flat, suggesting the previous run of clean outperformance has moderated into a more uncertain delivery pattern.
→StableEarnings
- Expectation
- EPS beats return in each of the next 2 consecutive quarters with positive surprises above 3%, restoring the consistency the quality profile implies.
CounterTwo misses in an uncertain industrial demand environment may reflect timing rather than structural deterioration; if end-market demand firms, earnings could snap back sharply to a more consistent cadence.
The RSI has reached 74, flagging overbought conditions, while on-balance volume is trending lower even as price pushes near 52-week highs — a divergence between price and volume that often signals distribution near a near-term peak.
→StableMomentum breakdown
- Expectation
- RSI retreats below 60 and on-balance volume turns to a rising trend for at least 4 consecutive weeks, resolving the current technical divergence.
CounterStrong franchise names can sustain overbought RSI readings for extended periods during institutional accumulation phases; a high RSI alone is insufficient to predict a near-term reversal when quality fundamentals underpin demand.
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis
Engine thesis — one sentence
W.W. Grainger operates a wide-moat industrial distribution franchise with best-in-class returns and a near-perfect financial health score, but price has effectively reached the near-term target with only 0.7% of upside remaining, the risk-to-reward has turned unfavorable at 0.18-to-1, and earnings consistency has softened — the quality story is intact but the current entry is not.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
Per-dimension breakdown
Quality
7.4/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 10.0 |
| ROA | 10.0 |
| Gross margin | 3.8 |
| Op margin | 6.7 |
| Net margin | 4.8 |
| Current ratio | 9.1 |
| FCF quality | 5.0 |
| Moat | 7.5 |
| Piotroski F | 10.0 |
- ▸Excellent ROE: 46%
- ▸Earnings quality warning: 65% FCF/NI
- ▸Wide economic moat
- ▸Compounder quality: strong returns + growth
Growth
5.3/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 5.0 |
| EPS growth | 5.6 |
Momentum
3.4/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 5.5 |
| MACD | 0.0 |
| OBV | 1.0 |
| MA position | 9.0 |
| Volume | 1.3 |
- ▸Volume distribution (falling OBV)
- ▸Above 200-day MA
Sentiment
4.8/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| LLM sentiment | 5.0 |
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
| Price target | 4.2 |
Insider
5.0/10data confidence 50%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 5.1 |
- ▸Insider selling (low materiality) — $3,232,296 (0.005% of mkt cap)
Peer rank
5.7/10data confidence 80%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 1.2 |
| quality rank | 9.2 |
| growth rank | 7.4 |
- ▸Superior ROE vs peers
- ▸Best-in-class margins
Technical
5.6/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 3.7 |
| support resistance | 4.4 |
| 52w position | 9.3 |
| gap | 5.0 |
Risk (lower is worse)
7.1/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 8.3 |
| days to cover | 5.4 |
| volatility | 6.4 |
| put call | 9.6 |
| implied vol | 6.1 |
| beta | 6.9 |
| debt equity | 7.2 |
Catalyst
5.1/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 3.3 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 4.4 |
| dividend safety | 5.2 |
| news activity | 8.0 |
- ▸Earnings concerns: 2B/2M
- ▸Dividend: 69.0%
How the verdict was assembled
Engine trigger
Multiple concerning factors. Consider reducing position.
Engine technical detail
verdict_path:
L4:PATH_F_SELLPassed (6)
- INSIDER:OK
- 8K:CLEAN
- NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
- EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:31d clear
- SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
- MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (2)
- MOMENTUM:3.4<4.5
- ASYMMETRY:-3.5=NEGATIVE
Warning (0)
none
Reward-to-Risk
-3.48
Upside
-17.4%
Downside
5.0%
Sizing output
AVOID
SetupRange Bound — RSI 56 mid-range, Bollinger mid-band
EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityModerate — Balanced profile
Investment implication
The F-path SELL output reflects an overall score of 5.3 below the 5.6 soft trigger — multiple weakening dimensions accumulated rather than a single hard-floor breach. The strongest dimension ( Quality at 7.4) was not enough to lift the adjusted overall above the threshold. Co-occurring failed gates ( MOMENTUM:3.4<4.5, ASYMMETRY:-3.5=NEGATIVE) reinforce the read. Current asymmetry R:R is -3.48 — supplementary context, not the trigger for this path.
The strongest dimensions are Quality at 7.4, Risk (lower is worse) at 7.1, and Peer rank at 5.7; the weakest are Momentum at 3.4, Value at 4.0, and Sentiment at 4.8. The V9 engine flagged 2 failed gates, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -3.48 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
What would invalidate the thesis
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
- P1Best In Class Industrial Franchise
Trip ifReturn on equity falls below 25% for 2 consecutive quarters.
- P2Price Exhausted Risk Reward Inverted
Trip ifImplied upside to the analyst price target expands above 15%, with reward-to-risk recovering above 1.5-to-1.
- P3Earnings Consistency Recently Softened
Trip ifEPS surprise falls below 0% for 2 consecutive quarters.
- P4Overbought With Diverging Volume
Trip ifRSI stays above 70 for more than 8 consecutive weeks without a pullback below 55.