Value
6.2/10data confidence 83%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 9.8 |
| EV/EBITDA | 4.7 |
| Fwd P/E | 7.7 |
| PEG | 5.7 |
| Analyst target | 3.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 15.8x
- ▸PEG: 1.32
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
The company's overall quality assessment lands just below the minimum holding-grade threshold, driven by weak return on equity and below-average operating margins, even though the balance sheet and free cash flow metrics are comparatively sound. Warnings | Quality metrics rise above the minimum floor within four quarters as operating margins stabilize and return on capital recovers. | →Stable |
| CounterFree cash flow is converting at 1,000% of net income—a remarkably high ratio that may reflect accounting differences between cash and accrual earnings, and the Piotroski financial health score indicates an otherwise sound balance sheet. | ||
The stock is in a confirmed long-term downtrend with the 200-day moving average declining at 3.7% per 30 days, yet RSI has reached 73—an overbought reading in a declining trend that typically marks a bear-market rally peak rather than a genuine trend reversal. Momentum | RSI falls back below 50 within six weeks as the rally exhausts, confirming the continued dominance of the downtrend. | →Stable |
| CounterMACD is improving and on-balance volume is rising alongside the overbought RSI reading, which could indicate that what appears to be a bear rally is actually the early phase of a genuine trend reversal with accumulating demand. | ||
A put/call ratio of 2.13 indicates that options market participants are paying for significantly more downside protection than upside exposure—a signal that informed market participants remain skeptical of the current near-term price recovery. Risk | Put/call ratio normalizes below 1.0 within six months as the stock's trend reversal is confirmed and protective hedges are unwound. | →Stable |
| CounterElevated put/call ratios in recovering downtrends can sometimes signal a sentiment extreme rather than an accurate directional forecast, and heavy put positioning could ultimately fuel short-covering that amplifies any upside move. | ||
At a forward price-to-earnings ratio of 12.5 times and a PEG ratio of 1.32, the stock trades at an attractive multiple with roughly 27% analyst-consensus upside to the price target—a valuation case that provides a floor to downside risk if fundamentals stabilize. Value | Forward earnings estimates hold steady over the next 12 months, sustaining the low-multiple valuation case and supporting a price recovery toward analyst targets. | →Stable |
| CounterThe two earnings beats and two misses in the last four quarters, with a negative average EPS surprise of 3.1%, suggest estimates may be too high—eroding the apparent valuation attractiveness if earnings are cut. | ||
A recent officer departure or appointment flagged in corporate filings introduces leadership-transition uncertainty at a time when the business is already navigating below-floor quality metrics and an inconsistent earnings delivery record. Gates warning | The next two earnings reports show stable or improving guidance, confirming the leadership change has not disrupted operational execution. | →Stable |
| CounterLeadership changes can be catalysts for strategic reset—new executives sometimes initiate margin improvement programs or capital-allocation discipline that ultimately re-rate the stock over a 12-to-18-month horizon. | ||
CounterFree cash flow is converting at 1,000% of net income—a remarkably high ratio that may reflect accounting differences between cash and accrual earnings, and the Piotroski financial health score indicates an otherwise sound balance sheet.
CounterMACD is improving and on-balance volume is rising alongside the overbought RSI reading, which could indicate that what appears to be a bear rally is actually the early phase of a genuine trend reversal with accumulating demand.
CounterElevated put/call ratios in recovering downtrends can sometimes signal a sentiment extreme rather than an accurate directional forecast, and heavy put positioning could ultimately fuel short-covering that amplifies any upside move.
CounterThe two earnings beats and two misses in the last four quarters, with a negative average EPS surprise of 3.1%, suggest estimates may be too high—eroding the apparent valuation attractiveness if earnings are cut.
CounterLeadership changes can be catalysts for strategic reset—new executives sometimes initiate margin improvement programs or capital-allocation discipline that ultimately re-rate the stock over a 12-to-18-month horizon.
Genuine Parts carries an attractive forward valuation but falls just short of the quality floor, sits in a confirmed long-term downtrend with an overbought technical reading, and generates a risk/reward ratio below the minimum asymmetry bar—leaving the setup better suited to observation than new capital commitment.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 9.8 |
| EV/EBITDA | 4.7 |
| Fwd P/E | 7.7 |
| PEG | 5.7 |
| Analyst target | 3.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 0.4 |
| ROA | 3.0 |
| Gross margin | 3.5 |
| Op margin | 2.3 |
| Net margin | 0.1 |
| Current ratio | 4.3 |
| FCF quality | 10.0 |
| Moat | 5.0 |
| Piotroski F | 6.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 4.2 |
| EPS growth | 1.6 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 3.6 |
| MACD | 10.0 |
| OBV | 10.0 |
| MA position | 7.5 |
| Volume | 10.0 |
| vol acceleration | 9.1 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| LLM sentiment | 5.5 |
| Analyst rating | 6.8 |
| Price target | 5.2 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 5.1 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 2.5 |
| quality rank | 2.2 |
| growth rank | 4.3 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 0.0 |
| support resistance | 0.7 |
| 52w position | 7.8 |
| gap | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 6.4 |
| days to cover | 5.0 |
| volatility | 4.0 |
| put call | 8.0 |
| implied vol | 2.8 |
| beta | 9.1 |
| debt equity | 4.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 3.3 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 0.9 |
| dividend safety | 5.2 |
| news activity | 8.0 |
Quality below minimum threshold.
L1:HARD_BLOCKSetupRecovery — Death cross but MACD improving, RSI 87
EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityModerate — Balanced profile
The L1 gate blocked the positive-verdict path: a hard-floor threshold was breached, so dimensional pillars — including Momentum at 8.4 could not lift the engine output above the verdict floor. Failed gate signal: ASYMMETRY:-0.8=NEGATIVE.
The strongest dimensions are Momentum at 8.4, Value at 6.2, and Sentiment at 5.9; the weakest are Peer rank at 2.3, Growth at 2.9, and Technical at 3.4. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -0.80 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip if200-day moving average flattens and stock closes above it for 10 consecutive trading days while RSI sustains above 50.
Trip ifQuality score rises above the 4.0 minimum floor for 2 consecutive quarters.
Trip ifPut/call ratio falls below 1.0 for 4 consecutive weeks.
Trip ifForward P/E rises above 18x for 2 consecutive quarters.
Trip ifEPS exceeds consensus in both of the next 2 reported quarters.