Value
8.8/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 4.9 |
| P/S | 10.0 |
| EV/EBITDA | 10.0 |
| Fwd P/E | 9.7 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 7.5 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 7.2x
- ▸PEG: 0.19
- ▸Attractively valued
GGB · Why this verdict
Why Gerdau (GGB) is rated SELL
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Show full disclosure ▾Hide full disclosure ▴
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
VerdictSELL
Overall score5.3/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
Thesis pillars
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
The forward price-to-earnings multiple of 8.2 times sits alongside a forward-to-trailing price-to-sales ratio of just 0.28 times — a divergence that typically emerges when earnings have surged on a commodity-price spike that analyst forward models have not yet unwound, making the headline cheapness potentially illusory if spot prices mean-revert as the cycle turns. Bear case | If this risk is real, sell-side earnings estimates will be revised materially lower over the next two quarters, compressing the apparent value and confirming the forward multiple was built on peak rather than normalized profitability. | →Stable |
| CounterSteel end-market demand could remain elevated long enough for the forward estimate to prove durable, making the 8.2-times multiple a genuine value floor rather than a transient optical discount created by a commodity spike. | ||
At a forward price-to-earnings ratio of 8.2 times and a PEG ratio of 0.22, the stock screens as attractively valued in absolute terms, which may provide a partial downside anchor if earnings stabilize near current levels and the miss streak breaks. Valuation breakdown | If earnings stabilize and the miss streak ends, the multiple should expand toward a sector-average level over 12 months, generating meaningful price appreciation from the current depressed starting point. | →Stable |
| CounterCommodity-linked businesses frequently remain stuck at persistently low multiples through earnings downtrends; the apparent cheapness may be a value trap if the roughly 4% revenue decline deepens and EPS continues to disappoint. | ||
All four of the most recently reported quarters resulted in earnings misses, with the average shortfall running approximately 20 percentage points below consensus — a pattern that signals structural estimation error and makes it difficult to trust the forward earnings base as a reliable anchor for the valuation. Earnings | Until forward estimates are reset to reflect the realized shortfall, additional misses are the base case; the pillar is falsified by two consecutive quarters of positive earnings surprises. | →Stable |
| CounterA streak of misses can reflect analyst models that are slow to rebase rather than fundamental deterioration; once consensus resets to a more conservative starting point, the next print could arrive as a positive surprise even without any improvement in underlying operations. | ||
Free cash flow conversion at 140% of net income signals genuine cash generation well above reported earnings, providing a quality cushion — though this strength is set against a revenue trend that has declined roughly 4%, which could erode the conversion advantage if the top-line contraction deepens. Quality breakdown | Revenue returning to year-over-year growth over the next two quarters would confirm the high cash conversion is a structural quality feature rather than a transient working-capital benefit during a revenue trough. | →Stable |
| CounterHigh free cash flow relative to net income can persist through moderate revenue declines if capital expenditures remain disciplined; the cash quality may prove more resilient than the revenue trend alone would imply. | ||
The forward price-to-earnings multiple of 8.2 times sits alongside a forward-to-trailing price-to-sales ratio of just 0.28 times — a divergence that typically emerges when earnings have surged on a commodity-price spike that analyst forward models have not yet unwound, making the headline cheapness potentially illusory if spot prices mean-revert as the cycle turns.
→StableBear case
- Expectation
- If this risk is real, sell-side earnings estimates will be revised materially lower over the next two quarters, compressing the apparent value and confirming the forward multiple was built on peak rather than normalized profitability.
CounterSteel end-market demand could remain elevated long enough for the forward estimate to prove durable, making the 8.2-times multiple a genuine value floor rather than a transient optical discount created by a commodity spike.
At a forward price-to-earnings ratio of 8.2 times and a PEG ratio of 0.22, the stock screens as attractively valued in absolute terms, which may provide a partial downside anchor if earnings stabilize near current levels and the miss streak breaks.
→StableValuation breakdown
- Expectation
- If earnings stabilize and the miss streak ends, the multiple should expand toward a sector-average level over 12 months, generating meaningful price appreciation from the current depressed starting point.
CounterCommodity-linked businesses frequently remain stuck at persistently low multiples through earnings downtrends; the apparent cheapness may be a value trap if the roughly 4% revenue decline deepens and EPS continues to disappoint.
All four of the most recently reported quarters resulted in earnings misses, with the average shortfall running approximately 20 percentage points below consensus — a pattern that signals structural estimation error and makes it difficult to trust the forward earnings base as a reliable anchor for the valuation.
→StableEarnings
- Expectation
- Until forward estimates are reset to reflect the realized shortfall, additional misses are the base case; the pillar is falsified by two consecutive quarters of positive earnings surprises.
CounterA streak of misses can reflect analyst models that are slow to rebase rather than fundamental deterioration; once consensus resets to a more conservative starting point, the next print could arrive as a positive surprise even without any improvement in underlying operations.
Free cash flow conversion at 140% of net income signals genuine cash generation well above reported earnings, providing a quality cushion — though this strength is set against a revenue trend that has declined roughly 4%, which could erode the conversion advantage if the top-line contraction deepens.
→StableQuality breakdown
- Expectation
- Revenue returning to year-over-year growth over the next two quarters would confirm the high cash conversion is a structural quality feature rather than a transient working-capital benefit during a revenue trough.
CounterHigh free cash flow relative to net income can persist through moderate revenue declines if capital expenditures remain disciplined; the cash quality may prove more resilient than the revenue trend alone would imply.
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis
Engine thesis — one sentence
Gerdau presents a compelling headline value case at a single-digit forward multiple and strong free cash flow conversion, but four consecutive quarterly earnings misses averaging approximately 20 percentage points below consensus — alongside an explicitly flagged commodity-cycle peak in forward estimates — indicate the apparent cheapness is built on unreliable earnings projections, leaving the risk-reward decisively unfavorable.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
Per-dimension breakdown
Quality
4.5/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 1.0 |
| ROA | 3.0 |
| Gross margin | 0.0 |
| Op margin | 4.2 |
| Net margin | 1.2 |
| Current ratio | 9.3 |
| FCF quality | 9.7 |
| Moat | 4.6 |
| Piotroski F | 7.8 |
- ▸Excellent cash conversion: 140% FCF/NI
- ▸No competitive moat
- ▸Strong Piotroski F-Score: 7/9
Growth
5.6/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 1.6 |
| EPS growth | 9.6 |
- ▸Declining revenue: -4%
Momentum
4.2/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 8.4 |
| MACD | 3.2 |
| OBV | 1.0 |
| MA position | 4.0 |
| Volume | 4.6 |
- ▸Oversold in uptrend (RSI 24)
- ▸Volume distribution (falling OBV)
- ▸Above 200-day MA
Sentiment
6.2/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| LLM sentiment | 3.5 |
| Analyst rating | 6.5 |
| Price target | 8.8 |
- ▸Light analyst coverage (5.0) — signal dampened
- ▸Analyst upside: 34%
Insider
4.1/10data confidence 75%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 4.5 |
| insider conviction | 2.3 |
| holder change | 5.4 |
- ▸Modest insider selling — $3,519,767 (0.044% of mkt cap)
Peer rank
2.2/10data confidence 80%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 5.7 |
| quality rank | 3.1 |
| growth rank | 0.0 |
Technical
7.7/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 7.8 |
| support resistance | 8.8 |
| 52w position | 6.4 |
Risk (lower is worse)
5.3/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 8.2 |
| days to cover | 9.3 |
| volatility | 3.8 |
| put call | 0.0 |
| implied vol | 0.0 |
| beta | 7.6 |
| debt equity | 8.8 |
| news risk | 5.0 |
- ▸Elevated put/call: 2.00
- ▸High IV: 103%
Catalyst
3.7/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 0.0 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 0.0 |
| dividend safety | 4.2 |
| news activity | 8.0 |
- ▸Earnings concerns: 0B/4M
- ▸Yield trap warning: high yield but unsafe
How the verdict was assembled
Engine trigger
Multiple concerning factors. Consider reducing position.
Engine technical detail
verdict_path:
L4:PATH_F_SELLPassed (6)
- ASYMMETRY:2.3>=1.5
- INSIDER:OK
- 8K:CLEAN
- NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
- EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:31d clear
- SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (2)
- MOMENTUM:4.2<4.5
- MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:fwd=7.2x,ratio=0.28x
Warning (0)
none
Reward-to-Risk
2.33
Upside
+16.2%
Downside
6.9%
Sizing output
AVOID
Setup— — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed
EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityModerate — Balanced profile
Investment implication
The F-path SELL output reflects an overall score of 5.3 below the 5.6 soft trigger — multiple weakening dimensions accumulated rather than a single hard-floor breach. The strongest dimension ( Value at 8.8) was not enough to lift the adjusted overall above the threshold. Co-occurring failed gates ( MOMENTUM:4.2<4.5, MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:fwd=7.2x,ratio=0.28x) reinforce the read. Current asymmetry R:R is 2.33 — supplementary context, not the trigger for this path.
The strongest dimensions are Value at 8.8, Technical at 7.7, and Sentiment at 6.2; the weakest are Peer rank at 2.2, Catalyst at 3.7, and Insider at 4.1. The V9 engine flagged 2 failed gates, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 2.33 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
What would invalidate the thesis
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
- P1Commodity Cycle Peak In Forward Estimates
Trip ifEPS beats consensus by more than 5% for 2 consecutive quarters, confirming forward estimates were not distorted by peak commodity pricing.
- P2Sustained Earnings Miss Streak
Trip ifEPS surprise turns positive (greater than 0%) for 2 consecutive quarters.
- P3Absolute Value As Potential Floor
Trip ifEPS falls more than 25% below the year-ago comparable for 2 consecutive quarters, confirming the low multiple was a value trap rather than a genuine opportunity.
- P4Strong Cash Conversion Amid Revenue Decline
Trip ifFree cash flow falls below 100% of net income for 2 consecutive quarters, confirming the cash-conversion quality advantage has eroded.