Value
9.0/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 9.5 |
| EV/EBITDA | 6.3 |
| Fwd P/E | 9.5 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 8.6x
- ▸PEG: 0.01
- ▸Attractively valued
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Greenfire Resources is cash-burning, with free cash flow at -6% of revenue, and revenue is declining 19% year over year, underscoring weak underlying fundamentals. Quality breakdown | Free cash flow should turn positive and the revenue decline should moderate toward flat or positive growth. | →Stable |
| CounterE&P revenue swings heavily with commodity prices, so a 19% decline could reverse quickly if oil and gas prices recover rather than reflecting structural business deterioration. | ||
The company has missed earnings estimates in all 4 of its last 4 reported quarters, with an extremely negative average surprise near -303%. Earnings | The company should beat or meet estimates in at least one of the next 2 reported quarters, breaking the miss streak. | →Stable |
| CounterA 4-for-4 miss streak this severe may reflect systematically miscalibrated analyst estimates for a volatile E&P name rather than genuine operational underperformance. | ||
The engine's momentum gate failed at 3.8, below the 4.5 threshold, even though the stock is technically in an uptrend pullback above its 200-day moving average. Engine gate (failed) | The momentum score should recover above 4.5, clearing the gate that currently blocks the setup. | →Stable |
| CounterMomentum notes flag this as a buy-the-dip pullback in an existing uptrend, so a low momentum score right now doesn't necessarily indicate trend reversal. | ||
The stock screens attractively valued, with a forward P/E of 8.6x and PEG of 0.01, despite a quality score of 1.1, far below the 4.0 floor the engine requires. Valuation breakdown | Either the quality score should recover toward the 4.0 floor, or the valuation discount should widen further as risk gets repriced. | →Stable |
| CounterExtremely cheap valuation combined with a quality score this low is a classic value-trap setup where the market has already correctly priced in fundamental deterioration. | ||
CounterE&P revenue swings heavily with commodity prices, so a 19% decline could reverse quickly if oil and gas prices recover rather than reflecting structural business deterioration.
CounterA 4-for-4 miss streak this severe may reflect systematically miscalibrated analyst estimates for a volatile E&P name rather than genuine operational underperformance.
CounterMomentum notes flag this as a buy-the-dip pullback in an existing uptrend, so a low momentum score right now doesn't necessarily indicate trend reversal.
CounterExtremely cheap valuation combined with a quality score this low is a classic value-trap setup where the market has already correctly priced in fundamental deterioration.
Greenfire Resources is a deep-value E&P name at 8.6x forward P/E, undercut by cash burn, a 4-quarter earnings miss streak, and a failed momentum gate, with quality scoring far below the engine's 4.0 floor.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 9.5 |
| EV/EBITDA | 6.3 |
| Fwd P/E | 9.5 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 0.0 |
| ROA | 0.0 |
| Gross margin | 1.7 |
| Op margin | 0.0 |
| Net margin | 0.0 |
| Current ratio | 2.6 |
| FCF quality | 0.0 |
| Moat | 2.5 |
| Piotroski F | 3.3 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 0.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 5.5 |
| MACD | 6.2 |
| OBV | 1.0 |
| MA position | 4.0 |
| Volume | 0.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 7.5 |
| erm sentiment | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 8.0 |
| quality rank | 2.4 |
| growth rank | 0.9 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 6.1 |
| support resistance | 6.1 |
| 52w position | 5.9 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 9.9 |
| days to cover | 10.0 |
| volatility | 3.3 |
| beta | 10.0 |
| debt equity | 5.9 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 0.0 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 0.0 |
Quality below minimum threshold.
L1:HARD_BLOCKSetupRange Bound — RSI 49 mid-range, Bollinger mid-band
EdgeInst Constrain — Small cap ($0.7B) below institutional reach
SuitabilityAggressive — MCap $0.7B<$5B
The L1 gate blocked the positive-verdict path: a hard-floor threshold was breached, so dimensional pillars — including Value at 9.0 could not lift the engine output above the verdict floor. Failed gate signal: MOMENTUM:3.3<4.5.
The strongest dimensions are Value at 9.0, Risk (lower is worse) at 7.8, and Sentiment at 6.5; the weakest are Growth at 0.0, Quality at 1.1, and Catalyst at 2.5. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 0.00 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifFree cash flow stays below 0% of revenue for 2 more consecutive quarters.
Trip ifThe company misses earnings estimates in the next reported quarter, extending the miss streak to more than 4 consecutive quarters.
Trip ifMomentum score falls below 3.0, down from the current 3.8, confirming trend breakdown rather than a pullback.
Trip ifQuality score falls below 1.0, extending the gap beneath the 4.0 floor.