Value
7.4/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 4.9 |
| P/S | 9.4 |
| EV/EBITDA | 7.1 |
| Fwd P/E | 8.9 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 4.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 12.3x
- ▸PEG: 0.11
- ▸Attractively valued
GCMG · Why this verdict
Why GCM Grosvenor (GCMG) is rated SELL
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Show full disclosure ▾Hide full disclosure ▴
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
VerdictSELL
Overall score5.9/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
Thesis pillars
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
At a forward P/E of 10.8x and a PEG of 0.10, shares are priced attractively relative to earnings power, and analyst consensus implies approximately 25% additional upside from current levels — a notable gap between market price and professional estimates. Valuation breakdown | If the discount closes, the stock should advance toward consensus targets over 12 months, driven by reaffirmation of estimates or upward revisions following continued execution. | →Stable |
| CounterThe market cap of $0.69B sits below the $1B minimum for most institutional buyers, structurally limiting the demand base that could close this valuation gap and suggesting the discount may persist for technical rather than fundamental reasons. | ||
Free cash flow runs at more than twice reported net income (229%), the financial health score is 7 out of 9, and over the three quarters through early 2026 the company delivered three consecutive beats — together signaling a business that consistently converts earnings power into actual cash. Quality breakdown | FCF-to-net-income ratio stays above 150% for 2 consecutive quarters, confirming the conversion premium is structural rather than driven by one-time items. | →Stable |
| CounterThe most recent quarter came in at estimates with no positive surprise, ending the three-quarter beat streak — raising the question of whether operating momentum is beginning to slow. | ||
With 71% of assets concentrated in private markets and customized separate accounts representing the same 71% share, the business has limited diversification, amplifying its exposure to any contraction in alternatives demand. Bear case | This risk persists until the company discloses a reduction in private-markets concentration below 60% of assets in a subsequent filing. | →Stable |
| CounterMomentum has recovered and volume is accumulating, suggesting the market is already pricing in this concentration risk without imposing a further structural discount on the shares. | ||
Upside of 6.1% to the take-profit target versus downside of 14.7% produces a reward-to-risk ratio of 0.42-to-1 — well below the level where the setup would be considered compelling for new capital, even against a reasonable fundamental backdrop. Price targets | The setup becomes attractive only when the reward-to-risk ratio rises above 1.5-to-1 through either a price pullback or a meaningful upward revision to analyst price targets. | →Stable |
| CounterA positive momentum trend with volume accumulation could support a gradual upward drift that slowly improves the asymmetry without requiring a correction, particularly if upcoming earnings continue to meet or exceed estimates. | ||
At a forward P/E of 10.8x and a PEG of 0.10, shares are priced attractively relative to earnings power, and analyst consensus implies approximately 25% additional upside from current levels — a notable gap between market price and professional estimates.
→StableValuation breakdown
- Expectation
- If the discount closes, the stock should advance toward consensus targets over 12 months, driven by reaffirmation of estimates or upward revisions following continued execution.
CounterThe market cap of $0.69B sits below the $1B minimum for most institutional buyers, structurally limiting the demand base that could close this valuation gap and suggesting the discount may persist for technical rather than fundamental reasons.
Free cash flow runs at more than twice reported net income (229%), the financial health score is 7 out of 9, and over the three quarters through early 2026 the company delivered three consecutive beats — together signaling a business that consistently converts earnings power into actual cash.
→StableQuality breakdown
- Expectation
- FCF-to-net-income ratio stays above 150% for 2 consecutive quarters, confirming the conversion premium is structural rather than driven by one-time items.
CounterThe most recent quarter came in at estimates with no positive surprise, ending the three-quarter beat streak — raising the question of whether operating momentum is beginning to slow.
With 71% of assets concentrated in private markets and customized separate accounts representing the same 71% share, the business has limited diversification, amplifying its exposure to any contraction in alternatives demand.
→StableBear case
- Expectation
- This risk persists until the company discloses a reduction in private-markets concentration below 60% of assets in a subsequent filing.
CounterMomentum has recovered and volume is accumulating, suggesting the market is already pricing in this concentration risk without imposing a further structural discount on the shares.
Upside of 6.1% to the take-profit target versus downside of 14.7% produces a reward-to-risk ratio of 0.42-to-1 — well below the level where the setup would be considered compelling for new capital, even against a reasonable fundamental backdrop.
→StablePrice targets
- Expectation
- The setup becomes attractive only when the reward-to-risk ratio rises above 1.5-to-1 through either a price pullback or a meaningful upward revision to analyst price targets.
CounterA positive momentum trend with volume accumulation could support a gradual upward drift that slowly improves the asymmetry without requiring a correction, particularly if upcoming earnings continue to meet or exceed estimates.
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis
Engine thesis — one sentence
GCM Grosvenor's shares screen attractively valued against analyst targets with strong cash generation and a solid beat streak, but a market cap below the $1B investable floor, heavy private-markets concentration, and unfavorable price asymmetry collectively constrain the practical case for a new position.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
Per-dimension breakdown
Quality
7.0/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROA | 9.1 |
| Gross margin | 4.7 |
| Op margin | 6.6 |
| Net margin | 4.6 |
| Current ratio | 7.8 |
| FCF quality | 10.0 |
| Moat | 5.0 |
| Piotroski F | 7.8 |
- ▸Excellent cash conversion: 229% FCF/NI
- ▸No competitive moat
- ▸Strong Piotroski F-Score: 7/9
Growth
6.1/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 2.2 |
| EPS growth | 10.0 |
- ▸Declining revenue: -1%
Momentum
5.9/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 3.5 |
| MACD | 8.2 |
| OBV | 10.0 |
| MA position | 7.5 |
| Volume | 0.3 |
- ▸Overbought (RSI 90)
- ▸Volume accumulation (rising OBV)
- ▸Above 200-MA but MA slope flat/negative + RSI 90 (late-cycle distribution risk)
Sentiment
5.5/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
| Price target | 6.5 |
| erm sentiment | 5.0 |
Insider
5.0/10data confidence 50%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 5.0 |
- ▸No net insider activity — $0 (0.000% of mkt cap)
Peer rank
4.1/10data confidence 80%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 6.0 |
| quality rank | 5.9 |
| growth rank | 4.3 |
- ▸Superior ROE vs peers
Technical
4.0/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 0.7 |
| support resistance | 0.2 |
| 52w position | 9.9 |
| gap | 5.0 |
Risk (lower is worse)
6.4/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 8.3 |
| days to cover | 6.8 |
| volatility | 5.1 |
| put call | 10.0 |
| implied vol | 4.8 |
| beta | 8.0 |
| debt equity | 1.5 |
- ▸Concentration risks: 2 HIGH (10-K Item 1A — sized via position_sizing, validated via buy_confidence)
Catalyst
6.2/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 10.0 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 7.5 |
| dividend safety | 3.5 |
- ▸Strong earnings: 3B/0M
- ▸Yield trap warning: high yield but unsafe
How the verdict was assembled
Engine trigger
Multiple concerning factors. Consider reducing position.
Engine technical detail
verdict_path:
L4:PATH_F_SELLPassed (7)
- MOMENTUM:5.9>=5.5
- INSIDER:OK
- 8K:CLEAN
- NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
- EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:34d clear
- SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
- MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (1)
- ASYMMETRY:-0.4=NEGATIVE
Warning (0)
none
Reward-to-Risk
-0.41
Upside
-6.2%
Downside
15.0%
Sizing output
AVOID
Setup— — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed
EdgeInst Constrain — Small cap ($0.8B) below institutional reach
SuitabilityAggressive — MCap $0.8B<$5B
Investment implication
The F-path SELL output reflects an overall score of 4.4 below the 5.6 soft trigger — multiple weakening dimensions accumulated rather than a single hard-floor breach. The strongest dimension ( Value at 7.4) was not enough to lift the adjusted overall above the threshold. Co-occurring failed gates ( ASYMMETRY:-0.4=NEGATIVE) reinforce the read. Current asymmetry R:R is -0.41 — supplementary context, not the trigger for this path.
The strongest dimensions are Value at 7.4, Quality at 7.0, and Risk (lower is worse) at 6.4; the weakest are Technical at 4.0, Peer rank at 4.1, and Insider at 5.0. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -0.41 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
What would invalidate the thesis
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
- P1Valuation Analyst Target Gap
Trip ifUpside to analyst consensus price target compresses below 5% as the stock closes the valuation gap (consensus currently implies approximately 25% upside).
- P2Cash Conversion Earnings Quality
Trip ifFCF-to-net-income ratio falls below 100% for 2 consecutive quarters.
- P3Private Markets Concentration
Trip ifPrivate markets concentration falls below 60% of assets under management in a subsequent disclosed filing (currently 71%).
- P4Unfavorable Price Asymmetry
Trip ifReward-to-risk ratio rises above 1.5-to-1 as the price setup improves (currently 0.42-to-1).