Value
8.2/10data confidence 83%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 7.2 |
| P/S | 8.3 |
| Fwd P/E | 9.5 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 6.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 8.4x
- ▸PEG: 0.19
- ▸Attractively valued
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
Forbright shows strong margins, institutional accumulation, and positive insider signals, but a failed risk/reward asymmetry gate on a thin gap to its analyst target and a weak Piotroski score argue for maintaining rather than adding to the position.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Forbright trades just 4.2% below the analyst price target, one of the thinnest margins the engine tracks, and the asymmetry gate has failed at 0.6 versus the 1.5 minimum. Engine gate (failed) | The gap to target should widen (or the target should be revised up) to restore a healthier risk/reward asymmetry above 1.5 over the next 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterA thin gap to target on a bank with strong fundamentals can still be a reasonable hold if the target itself is conservative and likely to be raised as results come in. | ||
Forbright's Piotroski F-Score of 2 out of 9 is weak, despite the business carrying strong margins of roughly 24%. Quality breakdown | The Piotroski F-Score should improve toward the middle of its 0-9 range over the next 12 months as balance-sheet and profitability trends firm up. | →Stable |
| CounterThe Piotroski F-Score is designed for industrial/value stocks and can understate quality for a bank, where metrics like net interest margin and credit quality matter more. | ||
Institutions are accumulating the stock and the insider signal is positive, even though the reported net share-count change nets to zero. Insider breakdown | Institutional ownership should continue rising and insider activity should stay net positive over the next 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterA flat net insider share count with only a qualitative 'institutions accumulating' note is a weak signal that may not persist or may reverse quickly. | ||
Analyst coverage is light, which the engine flags as dampening the reliability of the sentiment and price-target signals. Sentiment breakdown | Analyst coverage should expand over the next 12 months, increasing confidence in the price target and rating. | ↓Deteriorating |
| CounterThin coverage on a recently-public or smaller bank is normal and often expands mechanically over time regardless of the underlying investment merit. | ||
The bear case flags weak growth for Forbright, consistent with modest revenue growth in the underlying financials. Bear case | Revenue growth should accelerate from its current modest pace over the next 12 months. | ↑Improving |
| CounterSlow, steady growth is typical and often preferred for a bank, where rapid loan growth can itself be a risk signal rather than a strength. | ||
CounterA thin gap to target on a bank with strong fundamentals can still be a reasonable hold if the target itself is conservative and likely to be raised as results come in.
CounterThe Piotroski F-Score is designed for industrial/value stocks and can understate quality for a bank, where metrics like net interest margin and credit quality matter more.
CounterA flat net insider share count with only a qualitative 'institutions accumulating' note is a weak signal that may not persist or may reverse quickly.
CounterThin coverage on a recently-public or smaller bank is normal and often expands mechanically over time regardless of the underlying investment merit.
CounterSlow, steady growth is typical and often preferred for a bank, where rapid loan growth can itself be a risk signal rather than a strength.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 7.2 |
| P/S | 8.3 |
| Fwd P/E | 9.5 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 6.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Gross margin | 0.0 |
| Op margin | 7.3 |
| Net margin | 10.0 |
| Moat | 5.5 |
| Piotroski F | 2.2 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 6.2 |
| EPS growth | 0.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 4.5 |
| MACD | 6.9 |
| OBV | 10.0 |
| MA position | 5.5 |
| Volume | 4.9 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
| Price target | 7.8 |
| erm sentiment | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 10.0 |
| notable moves | 7.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 5.3 |
| quality rank | 1.0 |
| growth rank | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 4.7 |
| support resistance | 5.5 |
| 52w position | 7.2 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 9.9 |
| days to cover | 10.0 |
| volatility | 4.6 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 0.0 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 0.0 |
Maintain position. Not compelling to add more.
L4:PATH_F_HOLDnone
SetupRange Bound — RSI 47 mid-range, Bollinger mid-band
EdgeInst Constrain — Small cap ($1.0B) below institutional reach
SuitabilityAggressive — MCap $1.0B<$5B
None of the engine's positive-conviction paths (C-quality, D-momentum) triggered — the F-path HOLD reflects balanced signals. Strongest-cleared gate: MOMENTUM:6.4>=5.5. Top dim: Value at 8.2; weakest: Catalyst at 2.5. No conviction either direction.
The strongest dimensions are Value at 8.2, Risk (lower is worse) at 8.2, and Insider at 7.3; the weakest are Catalyst at 2.5, Growth at 3.1, and Peer rank at 4.1. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 0.86 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifThe asymmetry ratio rises above 1.5, restoring the gate that currently fails at 0.6.
Trip ifPiotroski F-Score reaches at least 6 out of 9, from the current 2.
Trip ifNet insider share activity turns negative and exceeds 50,000 net shares sold over 90 days.
Trip ifAnalyst coverage expands to more than 10 covering analysts.
Trip ifRevenue growth exceeds 15% YoY for 2 consecutive quarters.