Value
5.5/10data confidence 83%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 2.9 |
| P/S | 0.2 |
| Fwd P/E | 5.3 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 9.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 23.8x
- ▸PEG: 0.32
FIGR · Why this verdict
Why Figure Technology Solutions, In (FIGR) is rated HOLD
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Show full disclosure ▾Hide full disclosure ▴
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
VerdictHOLD
Overall score6.2/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
Thesis pillars
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
The business derives 98% of volume from HELOC originations and 56% of activity flows through its top 10 partners, creating dual-layer concentration risk where a shift in home equity lending demand or the loss of a single major partner would disproportionately affect results. Bear case | HELOC originations decrease to less than 85% of total product volume as the company diversifies into adjacent product lines over the next 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterSpecialization in HELOC can create operational depth and pricing efficiency that a diversified model cannot match; the concentration may confer cost advantages that protect margins even through product-market fluctuations. | ||
The business has been assessed as having a wide economic moat, supported by 35% margins, a Rule of 40 score of 135, and a Piotroski F-Score of 7 out of 9 — a combination suggesting durable competitive position and financial discipline. Quality breakdown | Gross margins hold above 30% and the Rule of 40 remains above 100 for the next four fiscal quarters. | →Stable |
| CounterFree cash flow converts at only 44% of reported net income — an earnings quality concern that raises questions about whether reported earnings overstate economic earnings power and whether the moat is as durable as stated margins imply. | ||
Revenue is growing 119% year over year, with analyst consensus implying roughly 66% upside to the stock price — a trajectory that, if sustained, would make the current valuation look inexpensive in retrospect. Growth breakdown | Revenue growth stays above 70% year over year for the next two fiscal quarters. | →Stable |
| CounterAt this starting velocity, growth will mathematically decelerate as the base expands; even a significant pullback from current rates would likely be interpreted as a disappointment and could reset valuation multiples sharply lower. | ||
The two most recent fiscal quarters both produced EPS misses — reversing a prior large beat — and a recent news-driven assessment shifted the stance toward reducing exposure, together signaling that near-term execution risk is elevated. Earnings | Earnings return to positive EPS surprises for 2 consecutive quarters, demonstrating that the recent miss pattern was transitory. | →Stable |
| CounterThe one prior beat was dramatically large (over 360%), meaning the absolute surprise distribution is wide and two small misses on a still-developing earnings base may overstate the underlying execution problem. | ||
The business derives 98% of volume from HELOC originations and 56% of activity flows through its top 10 partners, creating dual-layer concentration risk where a shift in home equity lending demand or the loss of a single major partner would disproportionately affect results.
→StableBear case
- Expectation
- HELOC originations decrease to less than 85% of total product volume as the company diversifies into adjacent product lines over the next 12 months.
CounterSpecialization in HELOC can create operational depth and pricing efficiency that a diversified model cannot match; the concentration may confer cost advantages that protect margins even through product-market fluctuations.
The business has been assessed as having a wide economic moat, supported by 35% margins, a Rule of 40 score of 135, and a Piotroski F-Score of 7 out of 9 — a combination suggesting durable competitive position and financial discipline.
→StableQuality breakdown
- Expectation
- Gross margins hold above 30% and the Rule of 40 remains above 100 for the next four fiscal quarters.
CounterFree cash flow converts at only 44% of reported net income — an earnings quality concern that raises questions about whether reported earnings overstate economic earnings power and whether the moat is as durable as stated margins imply.
Revenue is growing 119% year over year, with analyst consensus implying roughly 66% upside to the stock price — a trajectory that, if sustained, would make the current valuation look inexpensive in retrospect.
→StableGrowth breakdown
- Expectation
- Revenue growth stays above 70% year over year for the next two fiscal quarters.
CounterAt this starting velocity, growth will mathematically decelerate as the base expands; even a significant pullback from current rates would likely be interpreted as a disappointment and could reset valuation multiples sharply lower.
The two most recent fiscal quarters both produced EPS misses — reversing a prior large beat — and a recent news-driven assessment shifted the stance toward reducing exposure, together signaling that near-term execution risk is elevated.
→StableEarnings
- Expectation
- Earnings return to positive EPS surprises for 2 consecutive quarters, demonstrating that the recent miss pattern was transitory.
CounterThe one prior beat was dramatically large (over 360%), meaning the absolute surprise distribution is wide and two small misses on a still-developing earnings base may overstate the underlying execution problem.
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis
Engine thesis — one sentence
An exceptional combination of wide economic moat, 119% revenue growth, and a Rule of 40 score of 135 establishes strong business quality, but two consecutive earnings misses, near-total product concentration in HELOC originations, and a recent news-driven downgrade warrant caution.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
Per-dimension breakdown
Quality
7.5/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 7.2 |
| ROA | 2.6 |
| Gross margin | 10.0 |
| Op margin | 9.9 |
| Net margin | 10.0 |
| Current ratio | 6.7 |
| FCF quality | 3.5 |
| Moat | 7.5 |
| Rule of 40 | 9.5 |
| Piotroski F | 7.8 |
- ▸Strong margins: 35%
- ▸Earnings quality RED FLAG: 44% FCF/NI
- ▸Wide economic moat
- ▸Compounder quality: strong returns + growth
Growth
10.0/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 10.0 |
| EPS growth | 10.0 |
- ▸Strong growth: 119% YoY
Momentum
6.6/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 3.1 |
| MACD | 10.0 |
| OBV | 10.0 |
| MA position | 6.5 |
| Volume | 3.5 |
- ▸Volume accumulation (rising OBV)
- ▸Below 200-MA, MA slope flat
Sentiment
7.6/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| LLM sentiment | 6.6 |
| Analyst rating | 6.7 |
| Price target | 9.8 |
- ▸LLM news sentiment: +0.32 (n=10)
- ▸Light analyst coverage (7.0) — signal dampened
- ▸Analyst upside: 63%
Insider
3.5/10data confidence 75%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 3.0 |
| insider conviction | 2.0 |
| holder change | 5.5 |
- ▸Notable insider selling — $16,802,640 (0.224% of mkt cap)
Peer rank
4.3/10data confidence 80%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 1.1 |
| quality rank | 7.7 |
| growth rank | 8.5 |
- ▸Best-in-class margins
- ▸Industry growth leader
Technical
0.3/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 0.0 |
| support resistance | 1.0 |
| 52w position | 0.0 |
Risk (lower is worse)
5.2/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 7.6 |
| days to cover | 8.4 |
| volatility | 0.0 |
| put call | 10.0 |
| implied vol | 0.0 |
| debt equity | 5.0 |
- ▸High IV: 93%
- ▸Concentration risks: 2 HIGH (10-K Item 1A — sized via position_sizing, validated via buy_confidence)
Catalyst
5.8/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 1.1 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 10.0 |
| news activity | 8.0 |
- ▸Earnings concerns: 1B/2M
How the verdict was assembled
Engine trigger
Maintain position. Not compelling to add more.
Engine technical detail
verdict_path:
L4:PATH_F_HOLDPassed (7)
- MOMENTUM:6.6>=5.5
- ASYMMETRY:2.8>=1.5
- INSIDER:OK
- 8K:CLEAN
- EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:41d clear
- SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
- MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (0)
none
Warning (1)
- DEATH_CROSS:momentum=6.6>=5.0 recovering
Reward-to-Risk
2.77
Upside
+41.5%
Downside
15.0%
Sizing output
AVOID
SetupRecovery — Death cross but MACD improving, RSI 69
EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified
SuitabilitySpeculative — Drawdown -56% (>40% off 52w high)
Investment implication
None of the engine's positive-conviction paths (C-quality, D-momentum) triggered — the F-path HOLD reflects balanced signals. Strongest-cleared gate: MOMENTUM:6.6>=5.5. Top dim: Growth at 10.0; weakest: Technical at 0.3. No conviction either direction.
The strongest dimensions are Growth at 10.0, Sentiment at 7.6, and Quality at 7.5; the weakest are Technical at 0.3, Insider at 3.5, and Peer rank at 4.3. The V9 engine cleared all gates with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 2.77 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
What would invalidate the thesis
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
- P1Wide Moat Elite Quality Metrics
Trip ifGross margin compresses below 25% for 2 consecutive quarters.
- P2Hypergrowth Revenue 119pct
Trip ifRevenue growth falls below 60% year over year for 2 consecutive quarters.
- P3Heloc Product Partner Concentration
Trip ifHELOC originations fall below 85% of total product volume within 12 months.
- P4Recent Earnings Miss Pattern
Trip ifEPS exceeds consensus in 2 consecutive quarters, reversing the recent miss pattern.