Indiana, Ohio, Kentucky and Illinois
“10-K Item 1A: 'Our community banking business model and local market focus has led to a concentration in the markets in which we operate, namely Indiana, Ohio, Kentucky and Illinois'”
Updated
The most significant concentration First Financial Bancorp. discloses is Indiana, Ohio, Kentucky and Illinois, classified MEDIUM by disclosed size. Below: the full set from the latest 10-K — verbatim quotes, filing references, and a synthesis of what these exposures mean together.
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
Source: First Financial Bancorp.’s SEC Form 10-K filed — view the filing on SEC EDGAR ↗
Each card carries a disclosed-size chip (HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW — how large the exposure is as a share of revenue, not how dangerous it is) and a nature tag: Built-in(the company’s own model, geography, or products) or Outside party (an external customer, supplier, or distributor it relies on).
“10-K Item 1A: 'Our community banking business model and local market focus has led to a concentration in the markets in which we operate, namely Indiana, Ohio, Kentucky and Illinois'”
“10-K Item 1A: 'Bannockburn's business model relies, to some extent, upon a small number of large clients ... would adversely affect the revenue derived from Bannockburn'”
The company's disclosed concentration profile combines a moderate geographic exposure to a multi-state Midwest and Mid-Atlantic footprint with a moderate client dependency within one of its business units. The community banking model and local market focus has led to a concentration in markets — specifically Indiana, Ohio, Kentucky, and Illinois — by disclosed size a moderate geographic exposure with a structural character. These markets' economic conditions, employment levels, and commercial and residential real estate values drive loan demand, credit quality, and deposit stability, and the structural nature of this footprint means diversification would require significant branch or acquisition activity over time. A separate, distinct dependency exists within one business unit: Bannockburn's model relies, to some extent, on a small number of large clients, and the loss of any one of those relationships would adversely affect Bannockburn's revenue. This is a moderate client-dependency exposure by disclosed size. Its character is more idiosyncratic than the broader geographic concentration — it reflects named-client reliance at a subsidiary level rather than a macroeconomic geographic tilt. A client departure could impair that unit's contribution without affecting the core community banking operations. The two exposures sit at different levels of the enterprise and do not directly amplify each other. The geographic concentration is the more pervasive risk, given its effect across the entire loan and deposit book, while the Bannockburn client dependency is narrower and scoped to that subsidiary. Together they constitute a manageable but attention-worthy profile, with the Midwest geography as the primary macro variable and the Bannockburn client base as the primary idiosyncratic variable.
For the engine’s reasoning on FFBC’s current verdict — including which dimensions drove the score — see the per-dimension breakdown.
| Symbol | Name | HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASB | Associated Banc-Corp | 2 | 3 | 0 | 5 |
| BANC | Banc of California, Inc. | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| AX | Axos Financial, Inc. | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| AUB | Atlantic Union Bankshares Corpo | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| FFBC● | First Financial Bancorp. | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| ABCB | Ameris Bancorp | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Concentration counts reflect items disclosed in each peer’s most recent 10-K; disclosed-size classification uses TrendMatrix’s internal 10-K extraction taxonomy.