Value
7.3/10data confidence 83%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 8.3 |
| P/S | 7.4 |
| Fwd P/E | 9.2 |
| PEG | 8.8 |
| Analyst target | 3.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 10.4x
- ▸PEG: 0.70
- ▸Attractively valued
FCF · Why this verdict
Why First (FCF) is rated SELL
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Show full disclosure ▾Hide full disclosure ▴
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
VerdictSELL
Overall score5.4/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
Thesis pillars
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
The bank has delivered two earnings beats and two misses over the past four quarters, with the most recent quarter missing estimates by 7.5%; this alternating pattern of results signals inconsistent execution and undermines confidence in the bank's ability to predictably convert revenue into earnings. Earnings | Over the next 12 months, the bank returns to delivering positive EPS surprises for at least 2 consecutive quarters, reestablishing a reliable beat pattern. | →Stable |
| CounterTwo of the four quarters were beats, including a 9% positive surprise at the oldest quarter reviewed, suggesting the business retains earnings capacity; the recent miss may reflect a temporary headwind rather than a structural decline in profitability. | ||
A forward price-to-earnings multiple of roughly 10 times and a price-to-growth ratio of 0.67 place the stock in attractively valued territory; for a bank with 32% net margins and an 8-out-of-9 Piotroski score, the current multiple implies a degree of downside protection if earnings stabilize. Valuation breakdown | Over the next 12 months, forward earnings estimates hold steady or rise, keeping the forward multiple at or below 12 times and providing a valuation support floor. | →Stable |
| CounterA low valuation is not a catalyst on its own; without a return to consistent earnings beats, the multiple may remain compressed indefinitely, and a further earnings miss could push the price lower even from already moderated levels. | ||
The stock is just below its resistance price target with only 0.1% of headroom remaining against roughly 4% of downside exposure, producing a risk/reward of 0.03-to-1; this geometry makes the current price an unattractive entry point even for investors who are constructive on the fundamentals. Price targets | Over the next 12 months, a price pullback creates at least 8% headroom to the take-profit target, restoring a viable risk/reward for new entry. | →Stable |
| CounterIf fundamentals improve and analyst targets are revised upward following a return to earnings beats, the implied upside from current prices can expand meaningfully without requiring a stock pullback. | ||
Net margins of 32% and a Piotroski F-Score of 8 out of 9 reflect a well-managed balance sheet with strong profitability discipline; these metrics indicate the bank is not under financial stress despite the recent earnings inconsistency. Quality breakdown | Over the next 12 months, net margins remain above 25% and the Piotroski score stays at 7 or above, confirming that balance sheet quality is not deteriorating. | →Stable |
| CounterThe bank faces two medium-level concentration risks flagged in its annual disclosures, which can erode margins and capital quality if those concentrated exposures experience stress; the absence of a competitive moat reduces the buffer available to absorb such shocks. | ||
The bank has delivered two earnings beats and two misses over the past four quarters, with the most recent quarter missing estimates by 7.5%; this alternating pattern of results signals inconsistent execution and undermines confidence in the bank's ability to predictably convert revenue into earnings.
→StableEarnings
- Expectation
- Over the next 12 months, the bank returns to delivering positive EPS surprises for at least 2 consecutive quarters, reestablishing a reliable beat pattern.
CounterTwo of the four quarters were beats, including a 9% positive surprise at the oldest quarter reviewed, suggesting the business retains earnings capacity; the recent miss may reflect a temporary headwind rather than a structural decline in profitability.
A forward price-to-earnings multiple of roughly 10 times and a price-to-growth ratio of 0.67 place the stock in attractively valued territory; for a bank with 32% net margins and an 8-out-of-9 Piotroski score, the current multiple implies a degree of downside protection if earnings stabilize.
→StableValuation breakdown
- Expectation
- Over the next 12 months, forward earnings estimates hold steady or rise, keeping the forward multiple at or below 12 times and providing a valuation support floor.
CounterA low valuation is not a catalyst on its own; without a return to consistent earnings beats, the multiple may remain compressed indefinitely, and a further earnings miss could push the price lower even from already moderated levels.
The stock is just below its resistance price target with only 0.1% of headroom remaining against roughly 4% of downside exposure, producing a risk/reward of 0.03-to-1; this geometry makes the current price an unattractive entry point even for investors who are constructive on the fundamentals.
→StablePrice targets
- Expectation
- Over the next 12 months, a price pullback creates at least 8% headroom to the take-profit target, restoring a viable risk/reward for new entry.
CounterIf fundamentals improve and analyst targets are revised upward following a return to earnings beats, the implied upside from current prices can expand meaningfully without requiring a stock pullback.
Net margins of 32% and a Piotroski F-Score of 8 out of 9 reflect a well-managed balance sheet with strong profitability discipline; these metrics indicate the bank is not under financial stress despite the recent earnings inconsistency.
→StableQuality breakdown
- Expectation
- Over the next 12 months, net margins remain above 25% and the Piotroski score stays at 7 or above, confirming that balance sheet quality is not deteriorating.
CounterThe bank faces two medium-level concentration risks flagged in its annual disclosures, which can erode margins and capital quality if those concentrated exposures experience stress; the absence of a competitive moat reduces the buffer available to absorb such shocks.
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis
Engine thesis — one sentence
The bank offers an attractive valuation at a forward multiple of roughly 10 times earnings with strong balance sheet metrics, but two earnings misses in the last four quarters — most recently a 7.5% shortfall — combined with less than 0.1% headroom to the price target produce a risk/reward of 0.03-to-1; the setup calls for patience and evidence of restored earnings delivery before adding exposure.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
Per-dimension breakdown
Quality
5.4/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 3.5 |
| ROA | 0.9 |
| Gross margin | 0.0 |
| Op margin | 10.0 |
| Net margin | 10.0 |
| Moat | 4.8 |
| Piotroski F | 8.9 |
- ▸Strong margins: 32%
- ▸No competitive moat
- ▸Strong Piotroski F-Score: 8/9
Growth
4.9/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 4.8 |
| EPS growth | 5.0 |
Momentum
6.4/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 5.0 |
| MACD | 7.5 |
| OBV | 10.0 |
| MA position | 9.0 |
| Volume | 0.3 |
- ▸Volume accumulation (rising OBV)
- ▸Above 200-day MA
Sentiment
5.2/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
| Price target | 5.5 |
| erm sentiment | 5.0 |
Insider
3.9/10data confidence 75%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 4.5 |
| insider conviction | 2.1 |
| holder change | 5.1 |
- ▸Modest insider selling — $1,634,736 (0.079% of mkt cap)
Peer rank
4.4/10data confidence 80%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 4.1 |
| quality rank | 5.4 |
| growth rank | 3.2 |
Technical
4.5/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 1.9 |
| support resistance | 2.0 |
| 52w position | 9.6 |
Risk (lower is worse)
7.0/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 8.2 |
| days to cover | 7.0 |
| volatility | 7.7 |
| put call | 10.0 |
| implied vol | 0.5 |
| beta | 8.6 |
- ▸High IV: 77%
- ▸Concentration risks: 2 MED (10-K Item 1A)
Catalyst
4.2/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 3.3 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 2.5 |
| dividend safety | 5.2 |
- ▸Earnings concerns: 2B/2M
- ▸Dividend: 274.0%
How the verdict was assembled
Engine trigger
Multiple concerning factors. Consider reducing position.
Engine technical detail
verdict_path:
L4:PATH_F_SELLPassed (7)
- MOMENTUM:6.4>=5.5
- INSIDER:OK
- 8K:CLEAN
- NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
- EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:25d clear
- SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
- MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (1)
- ASYMMETRY:-1.3=NEGATIVE
Warning (0)
none
Reward-to-Risk
-1.27
Upside
-10.0%
Downside
7.9%
Sizing output
AVOID
SetupBreakout — Golden cross, above all MAs, RSI 64, MACD bullish
EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityAggressive — MCap $2.1B<$5B
Investment implication
The F-path SELL output reflects an overall score of 5.4 below the 5.6 soft trigger — multiple weakening dimensions accumulated rather than a single hard-floor breach. The strongest dimension ( Value at 7.3) was not enough to lift the adjusted overall above the threshold. Co-occurring failed gates ( ASYMMETRY:-1.3=NEGATIVE) reinforce the read. Current asymmetry R:R is -1.27 — supplementary context, not the trigger for this path.
The strongest dimensions are Value at 7.3, Risk (lower is worse) at 7.0, and Momentum at 6.4; the weakest are Insider at 3.9, Catalyst at 4.2, and Peer rank at 4.4. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -1.27 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
What would invalidate the thesis
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
- P1Mixed Earnings Track Record
Trip ifEPS surprise exceeds 3% for 2 consecutive quarters.
- P2Attractive Valuation Floor
Trip ifForward P/E multiple expands above 15x without a corresponding upward revision to earnings estimates.
- P3Price Target Exhaustion
Trip ifUpside to take-profit target exceeds 10% from current price.
- P4Balance Sheet Quality Discipline
Trip ifNet margin compresses below 25% for 2 consecutive quarters.