Value
7.5/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 1.5 |
| P/S | 9.2 |
| EV/EBITDA | 6.3 |
| Fwd P/E | 8.5 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 7.5 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 13.4x
- ▸PEG: 0.03
- ▸Attractively valued
ECVT · Why this verdict
Why Ecovyst (ECVT) is rated SELL
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Show full disclosure ▾Hide full disclosure ▴
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
VerdictSELL
Overall score6.4/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
Thesis pillars
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Price momentum has not cleared the minimum required threshold, and falling on-balance volume indicates that selling pressure is outpacing buying interest on balance — a technical setup that has historically preceded continued price weakness. Momentum breakdown | On-balance volume reverses to a sustained upward trend and price momentum recovers above the minimum threshold within 2 months. | →Stable |
| CounterRSI at 27 places the stock in oversold territory within what the technical notes characterize as an ongoing uptrend, which can represent a reentry opportunity rather than a breakdown; the stock remains above its 200-day moving average, and oversold readings in established uptrends often resolve with sharp recoveries. | ||
The company has beaten consensus estimates in all four of the most recent quarters with an average positive surprise of 68%, demonstrating that near-term results have consistently exceeded what analysts modeled. Earnings | EPS beats consensus in at least 3 of the next 4 quarters. | →Stable |
| CounterAll four beats involved estimates set close to zero — the most recent quarter had a $0.05 estimate versus $0.11 actual — making the large percentage surprises mathematically inevitable on near-zero bases rather than reflective of durable operational strength; any normalization of estimates or softening of results eliminates the streak. | ||
Revenue has grown 50% year-over-year, establishing this company as the growth leader in its industry peer group — a pace that, if sustained with improving margins, could resolve the current quality deficit through operating leverage. Growth breakdown | Revenue growth remains above 20% year-over-year for 2 consecutive quarters. | →Stable |
| CounterStrong top-line growth at a business with very weak return on assets and equity, and a near-zero gross margin score, raises the question of whether this growth is profitable; scaling an uneconomic revenue base without margin improvement creates more risk than value. | ||
Business quality remains below the minimum acceptable floor, with very weak scores on return on equity, return on assets, and gross margin contribution — conditions that make the growth story insufficient to justify a position without first seeing evidence of improving unit economics. Warnings | Return metrics show measurable and consistent improvement for 4 consecutive quarters as revenue scale begins translating into margin expansion. | →Stable |
| CounterA Piotroski F-score of 8 out of 9 — one of the highest attainable readings on that framework — confirms the business is not in financial distress; the quality deficit may be transient, particularly given the strong revenue growth trajectory that could drive operating leverage as the company scales. | ||
Price momentum has not cleared the minimum required threshold, and falling on-balance volume indicates that selling pressure is outpacing buying interest on balance — a technical setup that has historically preceded continued price weakness.
→StableMomentum breakdown
- Expectation
- On-balance volume reverses to a sustained upward trend and price momentum recovers above the minimum threshold within 2 months.
CounterRSI at 27 places the stock in oversold territory within what the technical notes characterize as an ongoing uptrend, which can represent a reentry opportunity rather than a breakdown; the stock remains above its 200-day moving average, and oversold readings in established uptrends often resolve with sharp recoveries.
The company has beaten consensus estimates in all four of the most recent quarters with an average positive surprise of 68%, demonstrating that near-term results have consistently exceeded what analysts modeled.
→StableEarnings
- Expectation
- EPS beats consensus in at least 3 of the next 4 quarters.
CounterAll four beats involved estimates set close to zero — the most recent quarter had a $0.05 estimate versus $0.11 actual — making the large percentage surprises mathematically inevitable on near-zero bases rather than reflective of durable operational strength; any normalization of estimates or softening of results eliminates the streak.
Revenue has grown 50% year-over-year, establishing this company as the growth leader in its industry peer group — a pace that, if sustained with improving margins, could resolve the current quality deficit through operating leverage.
→StableGrowth breakdown
- Expectation
- Revenue growth remains above 20% year-over-year for 2 consecutive quarters.
CounterStrong top-line growth at a business with very weak return on assets and equity, and a near-zero gross margin score, raises the question of whether this growth is profitable; scaling an uneconomic revenue base without margin improvement creates more risk than value.
Business quality remains below the minimum acceptable floor, with very weak scores on return on equity, return on assets, and gross margin contribution — conditions that make the growth story insufficient to justify a position without first seeing evidence of improving unit economics.
→StableWarnings
- Expectation
- Return metrics show measurable and consistent improvement for 4 consecutive quarters as revenue scale begins translating into margin expansion.
CounterA Piotroski F-score of 8 out of 9 — one of the highest attainable readings on that framework — confirms the business is not in financial distress; the quality deficit may be transient, particularly given the strong revenue growth trajectory that could drive operating leverage as the company scales.
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis
Engine thesis — one sentence
Despite four straight earnings beats averaging 68% above consensus and 50% year-over-year revenue growth that ranks this company as the industry growth leader, the business fails to clear the minimum quality threshold — driven by very weak return metrics and a near-zero gross margin contribution — while a failed momentum gate and falling volume accumulation create an unfavorable technical backdrop that makes the risk-adjusted case unconstructive.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
Per-dimension breakdown
Quality
3.6/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 1.1 |
| ROA | 2.5 |
| Gross margin | 0.4 |
| Op margin | 2.6 |
| Net margin | 0.0 |
| Current ratio | 8.1 |
| Moat | 5.6 |
| Piotroski F | 8.9 |
- ▸Strong Piotroski F-Score: 8/9
Growth
10.0/10data confidence 33%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 10.0 |
- ▸Strong growth: 50% YoY
Momentum
5.5/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 8.3 |
| MACD | 2.9 |
| OBV | 10.0 |
| MA position | 4.0 |
| Volume | 2.1 |
- ▸Oversold in uptrend (RSI 26)
- ▸Volume accumulation (rising OBV)
- ▸Above 200-day MA
Sentiment
7.3/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 7.6 |
| Price target | 8.8 |
| erm sentiment | 5.0 |
- ▸Light analyst coverage (6.0) — signal dampened
- ▸Analyst upside: 33%
Insider
5.0/10data confidence 50%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 5.0 |
- ▸Insider selling (low materiality) — $112,638 (0.009% of mkt cap)
Peer rank
3.6/10data confidence 80%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 3.0 |
| quality rank | 2.0 |
| growth rank | 9.3 |
- ▸Industry growth leader
Technical
8.3/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 10.0 |
| support resistance | 9.3 |
| 52w position | 5.7 |
Risk (lower is worse)
6.4/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 8.3 |
| days to cover | 8.9 |
| volatility | 4.6 |
| put call | 10.0 |
| implied vol | 0.0 |
| beta | 6.7 |
| debt equity | 6.4 |
- ▸High IV: 81%
Catalyst
7.5/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 10.0 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 10.0 |
- ▸Perfect beat streak: 4Q
How the verdict was assembled
Engine trigger
Quality below minimum threshold.
Engine technical detail
verdict_path:
L1:HARD_BLOCKPassed (8)
- MOMENTUM:5.5>=4.5
- ASYMMETRY:2.5>=1.5
- INSIDER:OK
- 8K:CLEAN
- NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
- EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:33d clear
- SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
- MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (0)
none
Warning (1)
- MOMENTUM:5.5<5.5 (soft — BUY_NOW allowed but watch)
Reward-to-Risk
2.51
Upside
+15.8%
Downside
6.3%
Sizing output
AVOID
Setup— — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed
EdgeInst Constrain — Small cap ($1.3B) below institutional reach
SuitabilityAggressive — MCap $1.3B<$5B
Investment implication
The L1 gate blocked the positive-verdict path: a hard-floor threshold was breached, so dimensional pillars — including Growth at 10.0 could not lift the engine output above the verdict floor.
The strongest dimensions are Growth at 10.0, Technical at 8.3, and Value at 7.5; the weakest are Peer rank at 3.6, Quality at 3.6, and Insider at 5.0. The V9 engine cleared all gates with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 2.51 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
What would invalidate the thesis
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
- P1Earnings Beat Streak Low Base
Trip ifEPS surprise falls below 0% for 2 consecutive quarters.
- P2Industry Leading Revenue Growth
Trip ifRevenue growth falls below 15% year-over-year for 2 consecutive quarters.
- P3Quality Below Minimum Threshold
Trip ifQuarterly EPS exceeds $0.35 for 3 consecutive quarters, materially above the recent high of $0.28, demonstrating that unit economics are improving.
- P4Momentum Failure Distribution Signal
Trip ifOn-balance volume turns positive for 2 consecutive months while RSI recovers above 50.