Value
4.6/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 3.0 |
| P/S | 8.2 |
| EV/EBITDA | 0.0 |
| Fwd P/E | 3.9 |
| PEG | 5.5 |
| Analyst target | 6.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 30.4x
- ▸PEG: 1.38
DRS · Why this verdict
Why Leonardo DRS (DRS) is rated SELL
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Show full disclosure ▾Hide full disclosure ▴
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
VerdictSELL
Overall score5.2/10
ConfidenceHIGH
MacroNEUTRAL
Thesis pillars
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
At a forward price-to-earnings multiple of 32 times, the stock is priced for near-perfection, while the current price sits just 6% below the identified price ceiling — a thin margin that leaves the risk/reward ratio well below a favorable threshold and the downside meaningfully larger than the available upside. Price targets | Over 12 months, earnings growth accelerates enough to compress the forward multiple below 22 times at the current price, justifying the premium without requiring further price appreciation. | →Stable |
| CounterDefense businesses with long-cycle contract visibility often command structural premiums to the broader market; a 32 times forward multiple may be reasonable if the contract backlog and program mix support durable above-market growth. | ||
Approximately 80% of revenue derives from the U.S. government, a single-buyer concentration that creates material dependency on budget cycles, continuing resolutions, and procurement decisions outside the company's control. Bear case | Over 12 months, non-government revenue grows to represent more than 25% of total revenue, meaningfully reducing the single-buyer concentration risk. | →Stable |
| CounterLong-term defense contracts provide revenue visibility and payment certainty that most commercial customers cannot match; for a defense-focused business, government concentration can be a stability feature rather than a vulnerability. | ||
The company has beaten earnings estimates in three of the last four quarters with an average positive surprise of nearly 13%, demonstrating a pattern of under-promising and over-delivering that has supported analyst confidence in forward estimates. Earnings | Over 12 months, the earnings beat streak continues with positive surprises in at least 3 of the next 4 quarters, maintaining the average surprise above 5%. | →Stable |
| CounterDefense program timing can create lumpy revenue recognition that flatters short-term beat streaks; a single delayed contract award or program restructuring can produce a sharp miss without any change in the underlying business quality. | ||
On-balance volume is declining despite the stock trading near its 52-week highs — a distribution signal suggesting that institutional holders may be reducing exposure into price strength rather than accumulating at current levels. Momentum | Over 12 months, on-balance volume returns to a rising trend for at least 3 consecutive months, indicating that volume conviction is supporting rather than contradicting the price level. | →Stable |
| CounterVolume-based indicators can produce false signals in thinly traded small-cap defense names where a single large block trade can distort on-balance volume trends for weeks. | ||
At a forward price-to-earnings multiple of 32 times, the stock is priced for near-perfection, while the current price sits just 6% below the identified price ceiling — a thin margin that leaves the risk/reward ratio well below a favorable threshold and the downside meaningfully larger than the available upside.
→StablePrice targets
- Expectation
- Over 12 months, earnings growth accelerates enough to compress the forward multiple below 22 times at the current price, justifying the premium without requiring further price appreciation.
CounterDefense businesses with long-cycle contract visibility often command structural premiums to the broader market; a 32 times forward multiple may be reasonable if the contract backlog and program mix support durable above-market growth.
Approximately 80% of revenue derives from the U.S. government, a single-buyer concentration that creates material dependency on budget cycles, continuing resolutions, and procurement decisions outside the company's control.
→StableBear case
- Expectation
- Over 12 months, non-government revenue grows to represent more than 25% of total revenue, meaningfully reducing the single-buyer concentration risk.
CounterLong-term defense contracts provide revenue visibility and payment certainty that most commercial customers cannot match; for a defense-focused business, government concentration can be a stability feature rather than a vulnerability.
The company has beaten earnings estimates in three of the last four quarters with an average positive surprise of nearly 13%, demonstrating a pattern of under-promising and over-delivering that has supported analyst confidence in forward estimates.
→StableEarnings
- Expectation
- Over 12 months, the earnings beat streak continues with positive surprises in at least 3 of the next 4 quarters, maintaining the average surprise above 5%.
CounterDefense program timing can create lumpy revenue recognition that flatters short-term beat streaks; a single delayed contract award or program restructuring can produce a sharp miss without any change in the underlying business quality.
On-balance volume is declining despite the stock trading near its 52-week highs — a distribution signal suggesting that institutional holders may be reducing exposure into price strength rather than accumulating at current levels.
→StableMomentum
- Expectation
- Over 12 months, on-balance volume returns to a rising trend for at least 3 consecutive months, indicating that volume conviction is supporting rather than contradicting the price level.
CounterVolume-based indicators can produce false signals in thinly traded small-cap defense names where a single large block trade can distort on-balance volume trends for weeks.
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis
Engine thesis — one sentence
A consistent earnings beat record over the past year has sustained a forward price-to-earnings multiple of 32 times, but the stock has essentially reached its price target with the risk/reward ratio unfavorable; an 80% customer concentration in a single government buyer adds structural fragility that a rich multiple can only absorb until a single contract disappointment materializes.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
Per-dimension breakdown
Quality
4.5/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 3.6 |
| ROA | 3.7 |
| Gross margin | 0.9 |
| Op margin | 3.6 |
| Net margin | 3.9 |
| Current ratio | 6.6 |
| FCF quality | 6.6 |
| Moat | 4.2 |
| Piotroski F | 7.8 |
- ▸No competitive moat
- ▸Strong Piotroski F-Score: 7/9
Growth
5.2/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 4.0 |
| EPS growth | 6.4 |
Momentum
7.0/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 8.5 |
| MACD | 0.0 |
| OBV | 10.0 |
| MA position | 4.0 |
| Volume | 10.0 |
| vol acceleration | 9.2 |
- ▸Uptrend pullback (RSI 30) - buy opportunity
- ▸Volume accumulation (rising OBV)
- ▸Above 200-day MA
- ▸Volume surge (2.6x avg) on up move
Sentiment
5.9/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
| Price target | 7.8 |
| erm sentiment | 5.0 |
- ▸Analyst upside: 21%
Insider
5.0/10data confidence 50%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 5.1 |
- ▸Insider selling (low materiality) — $2,003,374 (0.017% of mkt cap)
Peer rank
3.4/10data confidence 80%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 6.2 |
| quality rank | 6.0 |
| growth rank | 1.5 |
Technical
6.5/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 7.0 |
| support resistance | 6.7 |
| 52w position | 7.3 |
| gap | 5.0 |
Risk (lower is worse)
4.6/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 9.3 |
| days to cover | 6.6 |
| volatility | 1.6 |
| put call | 1.8 |
| implied vol | 2.7 |
| beta | 10.0 |
| debt equity | 0.0 |
- ▸Elevated put/call: 1.73
- ▸High IV: 64%
- ▸Concentration risks: 2 HIGH, 2 MED (10-K Item 1A — sized via position_sizing, validated via buy_confidence)
Catalyst
7.0/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 10.0 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 9.0 |
| dividend safety | 6.0 |
- ▸Strong earnings: 3B/0M
- ▸Dividend: 82.0%
How the verdict was assembled
Engine trigger
Multiple concerning factors. Consider reducing position.
Engine technical detail
verdict_path:
L4:PATH_F_SELLPassed (7)
- MOMENTUM:7.0>=5.5
- INSIDER:OK
- 8K:CLEAN
- NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
- EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:26d clear
- SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
- MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (1)
- ASYMMETRY:0.6<1.5@spot
Warning (0)
none
Reward-to-Risk
0.60
Upside
+5.3%
Downside
8.7%
Sizing output
AVOID
Setup— — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed
EdgeCatalyst-Driven — Earnings in 26d with 3/4 beat streak
SuitabilityModerate — Balanced profile
Investment implication
The F-path SELL output reflects an overall score of 3.7 below the 5.6 soft trigger — multiple weakening dimensions accumulated rather than a single hard-floor breach. The strongest dimension ( Momentum at 7.0) was not enough to lift the adjusted overall above the threshold. Co-occurring failed gates ( ASYMMETRY:0.6<1.5@spot) reinforce the read. Current asymmetry R:R is 0.60 — supplementary context, not the trigger for this path.
The strongest dimensions are Momentum at 7.0, Catalyst at 7.0, and Technical at 6.5; the weakest are Peer rank at 3.4, Quality at 4.5, and Risk (lower is worse) at 4.6. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 0.60 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
What would invalidate the thesis
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
- P1Consistent Earnings Beat Record
Trip ifEPS surprise falls below 0% for 2 consecutive quarters, breaking the established pattern of over-delivery.
- P2Rich Valuation Minimal Upside
Trip ifForward earnings estimates are revised upward such that the forward P/E compresses below 22x at the current price, indicating that growth is justifying the premium.
- P3Government Customer Concentration
Trip ifNon-government revenue exceeds 25% of total revenue for 2 consecutive reporting periods, indicating meaningful customer diversification.
- P4Waning Volume Conviction
Trip ifOn-balance volume rises above its prior 3-month average and holds that rising trend for 3 consecutive months, confirming that institutional accumulation has resumed.