Value
6.9/10data confidence 83%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 10.0 |
| EV/EBITDA | 6.7 |
| Fwd P/E | 4.9 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 3.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 25.6x
- ▸PEG: 0.08
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
The company carries a high dividend yield that has been flagged as potentially unsafe — income investors relying on the payout face the risk of a dividend reduction or suspension, which would likely accelerate selling pressure from yield-oriented holders. Catalyst breakdown | Dividend is maintained at or above current levels for 4 consecutive quarters with no reduction announcement. | →Stable |
| CounterHigh-yield refining businesses sometimes sustain dividends through variable payout structures tied to cash generation; a payout reduction rather than elimination may be the more likely outcome and could be absorbed without a sharp dislocation. | ||
The company has beaten analyst estimates in each of the last four quarters with extreme margins — the most recent quarter recorded an actual result of $0.08 against an estimate of negative $1.61, and the average upside surprise across all four quarters exceeded 1,000% — a beat pattern reflecting either deeply conservative analyst anchoring or volatile refining economics that consistently outperform expectations. Earnings | The company delivers positive EPS surprises in at least 3 of the next 4 reported quarters. | →Stable |
| CounterExtreme earnings beats in a refining business reflect volatile crack-spread dynamics rather than secular improvement; a single margin normalization quarter could flip the entire beat pattern to a miss rapidly and without warning. | ||
Business quality sits at 1.9 out of the 4.0 minimum threshold for an investable setup — with no identifiable competitive advantage and sub-par returns across every standard measure — making the company fundamentally unattractive regardless of near-term earnings momentum. Warnings | Quality composite rises above 4.0 for 2 consecutive reporting periods. | →Stable |
| CounterCapital-intensive refining businesses can appear quality-impaired during margin-compressed cycles; a crack-spread recovery could restore returns quickly and lift the quality reading materially within 1-2 quarters. | ||
A short interest of 14% of the float represents a meaningful concentration of bearish bets — suggesting that experienced market participants may have visibility into margin pressures or balance-sheet vulnerabilities not yet reflected in reported results. Key risks | Short interest falls below 7% of float over the next 2 quarters as the bearish thesis is unwound. | →Stable |
| CounterA large short position can become a source of near-term upside through a squeeze; the extraordinary earnings beats already on record demonstrate that the bear case has repeatedly failed, and the remaining short base could accelerate any rally. | ||
The stock screens attractively on forward earnings multiples with a near-zero growth-adjusted valuation, but the technical resistance target has essentially been reached, leaving little upside buffer at the current price — the valuation discount appears largely priced in. Valuation breakdown | Price retraces more than 10% from the current level while forward earnings estimates remain stable, restoring meaningful headroom to the $49.32 resistance target. | →Stable |
| CounterA near-zero growth-adjusted multiple may simply reflect the market pricing in no growth expectations; the optically cheap multiple may indicate genuine concern about earnings durability rather than a mispricing. | ||
CounterHigh-yield refining businesses sometimes sustain dividends through variable payout structures tied to cash generation; a payout reduction rather than elimination may be the more likely outcome and could be absorbed without a sharp dislocation.
CounterExtreme earnings beats in a refining business reflect volatile crack-spread dynamics rather than secular improvement; a single margin normalization quarter could flip the entire beat pattern to a miss rapidly and without warning.
CounterCapital-intensive refining businesses can appear quality-impaired during margin-compressed cycles; a crack-spread recovery could restore returns quickly and lift the quality reading materially within 1-2 quarters.
CounterA large short position can become a source of near-term upside through a squeeze; the extraordinary earnings beats already on record demonstrate that the bear case has repeatedly failed, and the remaining short base could accelerate any rally.
CounterA near-zero growth-adjusted multiple may simply reflect the market pricing in no growth expectations; the optically cheap multiple may indicate genuine concern about earnings durability rather than a mispricing.
Delek US Holdings delivers extraordinary earnings beats across four consecutive quarters but sits below the minimum quality threshold with no competitive moat, a 14% short interest, a technically exhausted price near resistance, and a dividend flagged as potentially unsafe — the cyclical earnings strength is offset by structural quality weakness that limits conviction for a new position.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 10.0 |
| EV/EBITDA | 6.7 |
| Fwd P/E | 4.9 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 3.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 1.3 |
| ROA | 1.9 |
| Gross margin | 0.0 |
| Op margin | 0.0 |
| Net margin | 0.0 |
| Current ratio | 3.0 |
| Moat | 3.8 |
| Piotroski F | 5.6 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 2.6 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 5.0 |
| MACD | 10.0 |
| OBV | 10.0 |
| MA position | 9.0 |
| Volume | 2.9 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 7.1 |
| Price target | 5.1 |
| erm sentiment | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 3.0 |
| insider conviction | 2.0 |
| holder change | 5.1 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 5.6 |
| quality rank | 2.7 |
| growth rank | 1.1 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 1.0 |
| support resistance | 1.2 |
| 52w position | 9.4 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 2.9 |
| days to cover | 3.3 |
| volatility | 0.4 |
| put call | 7.3 |
| implied vol | 0.8 |
| beta | 9.6 |
| debt equity | 0.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 10.0 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 10.0 |
| dividend safety | 3.5 |
Quality below minimum threshold.
L1:HARD_BLOCKSetupBreakout — Golden cross, above all MAs, RSI 64, MACD bullish
EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityAggressive — MCap $3.2B<$5B
The L1 gate blocked the positive-verdict path: a hard-floor threshold was breached, so dimensional pillars — including Momentum at 7.4 could not lift the engine output above the verdict floor. Failed gate signal: ASYMMETRY:-0.8=NEGATIVE.
The strongest dimensions are Momentum at 7.4, Value at 6.9, and Catalyst at 6.7; the weakest are Quality at 1.9, Growth at 2.6, and Insider at 3.4. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate with 2 warnings, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -0.84 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifEPS surprise falls below 0% for 2 consecutive quarters.
Trip ifQuality composite rises above 4.0 for 2 consecutive reporting periods.
Trip ifShort interest falls below 7% of float within the next 2 quarters.
Trip ifPrice retraces below $40 while the $49.32 resistance target remains valid, restoring more than 20% upside headroom.
Trip ifDividend is maintained at or above current levels for 4 consecutive quarters with no reduction announcement.