Skip to main content
CSGSCSG Systems International, Inc.Sell5.8·$80.74+0.06%
CSGS · Concentration risk · 10-K extracted

CSG Systems International (CSGS) concentration risks

Updated

The most significant concentration CSG Systems International discloses is Charter and Comcast, classified MEDIUM by disclosed size. Below: the full set from the latest 10-K — verbatim quotes, filing references, and a synthesis of what these exposures mean together.

Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Show full disclosure ▾

About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.

Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.

Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.

No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.

No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.

Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.

Methodology · Editorial policy & full disclaimer

Source: CSG Systems International’s SEC Form 10-K filed view the filing on SEC EDGAR ↗

At a glance

Disclosed-size breakdown · 3 disclosed concentrations

HIGH0
MEDIUM1
LOW2
Disclosed concentrations

Each card carries a disclosed-size chip (HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW — how large the exposure is as a share of revenue, not how dangerous it is) and a nature tag: Built-in(the company’s own model, geography, or products) or Outside party (an external customer, supplier, or distributor it relies on).

MEDIUMOutside partyCustomer

Charter and Comcast

10-K Item 1A: 'we generate over 35% of our revenue from our two largest customers, Charter and Comcast'
SEC 10-K · filed Feb 2026
LOWOutside partyCustomer
19%

Charter

10-K Item 1: 'Charter | | $ | 236 | | | | 19 | % |'
SEC 10-K · filed Feb 2026
LOWOutside partyCustomer
17%

Comcast

10-K Item 1: 'Comcast | | | 210 | | | | 17 | % |'
SEC 10-K · filed Feb 2026
TrendMatrix Research · concentration synthesis

What these concentrations mean together

updated 2026-06-24

The company's concentration profile is defined by a moderate customer dependency on two named accounts. Charter and Comcast together generate over 35% of revenue, making them collectively the dominant revenue relationship and a meaningful dependency for a company operating in billing and revenue management software for communications providers. The character of this exposure is dependency rather than structural — the revenue is tied to specific customer relationships governed by contracts that are subject to renewal, competitive bidding, and M&A among communications operators. The two accounts are disclosed individually in the filing, with Charter and Comcast each representing a small share of revenue on their own disclosed-size basis. However, their combined weight is moderate, and because both serve the same communications-provider vertical, a broad sector disruption — such as cord-cutting accelerating subscriber losses or a wave of operator consolidation — could affect both relationships in the same direction at the same time, reducing the diversification benefit of having two separate counterparties. No geographic, product-segment, or supplier concentration is disclosed alongside the customer skew, keeping the profile relatively simple. On balance, this is a moderate customer dependency that argues for monitoring Charter and Comcast contract renewal timelines, subscriber trends at both operators, and any M&A activity in the broader communications provider landscape that could affect the number and scale of billing relationships the company maintains.

For the engine’s reasoning on CSGS’s current verdict — including which dimensions drove the score — see the per-dimension breakdown.

Industry peers · Software - Application

Peer concentration profile

SymbolNameHIGHMEDIUMLOWTotal
ADSKAutodesk, Inc.1113
ADEAAdeia Inc.1001
AGYSAgilysys, Inc.0202
CSGSCSG Systems International, Inc.0123
ADBEAdobe Inc.0000
ADPAutomatic Data Processing, Inc.0000

Concentration counts reflect items disclosed in each peer’s most recent 10-K; disclosed-size classification uses TrendMatrix’s internal 10-K extraction taxonomy.

Concentration disclosures are extracted verbatim from SEC 10-K filings; the disclosed-size classification and the synthesis above are engine-derived. Size reflects how large each exposure is against fixed share thresholds (HIGH >50%, MEDIUM 25–50%, LOW <25% or an explicit diversification statement), not a judgment of how dangerous it is, and is not a buy/sell rating, a price target, or a view on the stock. Not a complete list of risk factors — see the full filing.

Home Stocks CSGS Concentration risk