Value
8.0/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 8.5 |
| P/S | 9.3 |
| EV/EBITDA | 6.8 |
| Fwd P/E | 9.5 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 4.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 8.8x
- ▸PEG: 0.01
- ▸Attractively valued
CROX · Why this verdict
Why Crocs (CROX) is rated HOLD
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Show full disclosure ▾Hide full disclosure ▴
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
VerdictHOLD
Overall score6.3/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis
Engine thesis — one sentence
A disciplined operator with four consecutive earnings beats and a deeply compressed forward earnings multiple that has nearly reached its near-term price target, leaving less than 1% upside against approximately 7% downside; the fundamental execution story is intact but the current price creates a poor risk/reward for new capital.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
Thesis pillars
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
The company has beaten EPS estimates in each of the last four quarters with an average positive surprise of approximately 14%, demonstrating effective management of costs and expectations across varied market conditions. Earnings | The beat streak extends to at least 6 consecutive quarters with EPS surprise averaging above 5% per quarter. | ↓Deteriorating |
| CounterConsistently beating estimates on declining revenue is structurally fragile; if top-line erosion accelerates, cost discipline alone cannot sustain the pattern, and estimates may eventually reset below the level at which beating is achievable. | ||
Revenue has declined approximately 2% year-over-year, placing the company in the bottom tier of its peer group for growth and raising the question of whether current valuation multiples are sustainable absent a meaningful top-line recovery. Growth breakdown | Revenue growth turns positive and exceeds 3% year-over-year for 2 consecutive quarters, providing evidence that the contraction has reversed. | ↑Improving |
| CounterEPS beats alongside contracting revenue reflect successful margin management; if cost discipline continues, earnings can remain resilient even while the top line remains soft. | ||
At a forward price-to-earnings multiple of 8.7 times with a PEG ratio near zero, the stock screens as inexpensive on earnings metrics, though the absence of a documented competitive moat, declining revenue, and three medium-severity concentration risks suggest the compressed multiple may reflect genuine business uncertainty rather than a pure valuation opportunity. Quality breakdown | FCF margin expands above 20% from the current 11% level and debt-to-equity falls below 0.7 for 2 consecutive quarters, indicating that the cheap multiple is supported by improving fundamentals. | →Stable |
| CounterA PEG near zero with consistent earnings beats is a strong value signal; if management continues to under-promise and over-deliver, the multiple re-rates upward and the current discount proves to be the entry point. | ||
At the current price, just below the identified resistance target near $127, less than 1% of upside remains while approximately 7% of downside exists to the risk-management level — creating a clearly asymmetric setup where downside materially outweighs potential gain and does not favor new capital deployment here. Price targets | A pullback toward prior support, combined with a renewed constructive fundamental setup, would create a more favorable risk/reward entry point. | ↑Improving |
| CounterStrong near-term technical momentum — golden cross, bullish MACD, RSI 65, and the stock trading above its 200-day average — suggests the stock may break above resistance and extend meaningfully, making the static risk/reward analysis too conservative. | ||
The company has beaten EPS estimates in each of the last four quarters with an average positive surprise of approximately 14%, demonstrating effective management of costs and expectations across varied market conditions.
↓DeterioratingEarnings
- Expectation
- The beat streak extends to at least 6 consecutive quarters with EPS surprise averaging above 5% per quarter.
CounterConsistently beating estimates on declining revenue is structurally fragile; if top-line erosion accelerates, cost discipline alone cannot sustain the pattern, and estimates may eventually reset below the level at which beating is achievable.
Revenue has declined approximately 2% year-over-year, placing the company in the bottom tier of its peer group for growth and raising the question of whether current valuation multiples are sustainable absent a meaningful top-line recovery.
↑ImprovingGrowth breakdown
- Expectation
- Revenue growth turns positive and exceeds 3% year-over-year for 2 consecutive quarters, providing evidence that the contraction has reversed.
CounterEPS beats alongside contracting revenue reflect successful margin management; if cost discipline continues, earnings can remain resilient even while the top line remains soft.
At a forward price-to-earnings multiple of 8.7 times with a PEG ratio near zero, the stock screens as inexpensive on earnings metrics, though the absence of a documented competitive moat, declining revenue, and three medium-severity concentration risks suggest the compressed multiple may reflect genuine business uncertainty rather than a pure valuation opportunity.
→StableQuality breakdown
- Expectation
- FCF margin expands above 20% from the current 11% level and debt-to-equity falls below 0.7 for 2 consecutive quarters, indicating that the cheap multiple is supported by improving fundamentals.
CounterA PEG near zero with consistent earnings beats is a strong value signal; if management continues to under-promise and over-deliver, the multiple re-rates upward and the current discount proves to be the entry point.
At the current price, just below the identified resistance target near $127, less than 1% of upside remains while approximately 7% of downside exists to the risk-management level — creating a clearly asymmetric setup where downside materially outweighs potential gain and does not favor new capital deployment here.
↑ImprovingPrice targets
- Expectation
- A pullback toward prior support, combined with a renewed constructive fundamental setup, would create a more favorable risk/reward entry point.
CounterStrong near-term technical momentum — golden cross, bullish MACD, RSI 65, and the stock trading above its 200-day average — suggests the stock may break above resistance and extend meaningfully, making the static risk/reward analysis too conservative.
Per-dimension breakdown
Quality
7.6/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 10.0 |
| ROA | 8.0 |
| Gross margin | 7.5 |
| Op margin | 9.7 |
| Net margin | 7.3 |
| Current ratio | 5.5 |
| FCF quality | 6.5 |
| Moat | 6.4 |
| Piotroski F | 7.8 |
- ▸Excellent ROE: 42%
- ▸Strong Piotroski F-Score: 7/9
- ▸High-quality business
Growth
6.5/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 3.1 |
| EPS growth | 9.8 |
Momentum
4.4/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 5.5 |
| MACD | 0.0 |
| OBV | 9.2 |
| MA position | 6.0 |
| Volume | 1.5 |
- ▸Volume accumulation (rising OBV)
- ▸Above 200-day MA
Sentiment
6.1/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 7.1 |
| Price target | 5.9 |
| erm sentiment | 5.0 |
Insider
5.9/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 4.5 |
| insider conviction | 2.0 |
| holder change | 10.0 |
| notable moves | 7.0 |
- ▸Modest insider selling — $3,860,284 (0.061% of mkt cap)
- ▸Institutions accumulating
Peer rank
4.0/10data confidence 80%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 6.8 |
| quality rank | 6.4 |
| growth rank | 1.4 |
- ▸Attractive P/E vs peers
Technical
6.6/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 7.5 |
| support resistance | 3.8 |
| 52w position | 8.5 |
Risk (lower is worse)
4.6/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 3.8 |
| days to cover | 6.5 |
| volatility | 0.0 |
| put call | 9.9 |
| implied vol | 3.9 |
| max pain risk | 3.0 |
| beta | 4.9 |
| debt equity | 4.6 |
- ▸Above max pain $75
- ▸Concentration risks: 3 MED (10-K Item 1A)
Catalyst
7.3/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 10.0 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 9.4 |
- ▸Perfect beat streak: 4Q
How the verdict was assembled
Engine trigger
Maintain position. Not compelling to add more.
Engine technical detail
verdict_path:
L4:PATH_F_HOLDPassed (6)
- INSIDER:OK
- 8K:CLEAN
- NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
- EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:77d clear
- SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
- MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (2)
- MOMENTUM:4.4<4.5
- ASYMMETRY:-0.6=NEGATIVE
Warning (0)
none
Reward-to-Risk
-0.59
Upside
-7.9%
Downside
13.5%
Sizing output
AVOID
Setup— — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed
EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityAggressive — Beta 1.53>1.3
Investment implication
None of the engine's positive-conviction paths (C-quality, D-momentum) triggered — the F-path HOLD reflects balanced signals. Strongest-cleared gate: INSIDER:OK. Top dim: Value at 8.0; weakest: Peer rank at 4.0. No conviction either direction.
The strongest dimensions are Value at 8.0, Quality at 7.6, and Catalyst at 7.3; the weakest are Peer rank at 4.0, Momentum at 4.4, and Risk (lower is worse) at 4.6. The V9 engine flagged 2 failed gates, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -0.59 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
What would invalidate the thesis
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
- P1Consistent Earnings Delivery Beat Streak
Trip ifEPS surprise falls below 0% for 2 consecutive quarters.
- P2Revenue Contraction Structural Concern
Trip ifRevenue growth returns to positive territory above 3% YoY for 2 consecutive quarters.
- P3Stock At Target Unfavorable Asymmetry
Trip ifStock price breaks above $145, clearing the current resistance level by more than 15%.
- P4Cheap Multiple Offset By Structural Concerns
Trip ifFCF margin expands above 20% from the current 11% level for 2 consecutive quarters.