Value
6.0/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 6.9 |
| P/S | 6.2 |
| EV/EBITDA | 4.7 |
| Fwd P/E | 7.1 |
| PEG | 3.4 |
| Analyst target | 7.5 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 17.8x
- ▸PEG: 3.46
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
The business posts 33% net margins, a Piotroski F-Score of 8 out of 9—the highest quality tier—and ranks best-in-class for margins within its peer group, reflecting a durable operational franchise that sustains profitability through market cycles. Quality breakdown | Net margins remain at or above 30% over the next 12 months, confirming that the franchise quality is structural rather than cyclical. | →Stable |
| CounterFree cash flow runs at 64% of net income—below what 33% net margins would typically imply—and the notes flag this as a quality warning; if capital requirements are rising, the gap between reported margins and cash generation could widen and undermine the quality picture. | ||
Three of the last four reported quarters produced earnings beats, including the most recent quarter at +5.7% upside surprise; the average EPS surprise across the period is +4.0%, suggesting management consistently delivers results at or above sell-side expectations. Earnings | EPS beats continue for at least 3 of the next 4 reported quarters, sustaining the pattern of consistent execution against analyst estimates. | →Stable |
| CounterThe one miss in the four-quarter series came in at -8.1%—not a trivial deviation—and the business carries geographic and customer concentration risks that could produce lumpy results if the U.S. segment or primary insurance-seller relationships experience pressure. | ||
A confirmed death cross, RSI at 26 indicating capitulation territory, all moving averages in decline, and a 200-day moving average slope of -5.3% per month together constitute a falling-knife setup that blocks a clean technical entry—momentum has failed the 4.5 threshold at just 2.2, and the setup classification is consistent with that signal. Warnings | Momentum score recovers above 4.5, RSI rises above 40, and the 200-day moving average slope turns positive within 6 months, signaling that the downtrend has exhausted itself and a recovery is underway. | →Stable |
| CounterAn RSI of 26 in a high-quality business with strong earnings often marks a capitulation low rather than the start of a sustained bear phase; with 19% upside to the analyst target and a reward-to-risk ratio of 4.63, the risk/reward geometry is attractive for a patient investor if the bottom is near. | ||
The U.S. segment represents 83% of total revenue and insurance company sellers account for 81% of volume, creating two overlapping high-severity concentration risks that leave the business meaningfully exposed to U.S. economic conditions and the health of a single customer category. Bear case | International revenue grows to represent more than 20% of total revenue within 24 months, reducing the U.S. segment concentration below 80%. | →Stable |
| CounterDeep penetration in a single large market can be a competitive strength rather than just a risk; a dominant position with the largest U.S. insurance sellers creates switching-cost dynamics and volume advantages that a more geographically diversified competitor cannot easily replicate. | ||
CounterFree cash flow runs at 64% of net income—below what 33% net margins would typically imply—and the notes flag this as a quality warning; if capital requirements are rising, the gap between reported margins and cash generation could widen and undermine the quality picture.
CounterThe one miss in the four-quarter series came in at -8.1%—not a trivial deviation—and the business carries geographic and customer concentration risks that could produce lumpy results if the U.S. segment or primary insurance-seller relationships experience pressure.
CounterAn RSI of 26 in a high-quality business with strong earnings often marks a capitulation low rather than the start of a sustained bear phase; with 19% upside to the analyst target and a reward-to-risk ratio of 4.63, the risk/reward geometry is attractive for a patient investor if the bottom is near.
CounterDeep penetration in a single large market can be a competitive strength rather than just a risk; a dominant position with the largest U.S. insurance sellers creates switching-cost dynamics and volume advantages that a more geographically diversified competitor cannot easily replicate.
A best-in-class specialty services business with 33% margins, a Piotroski F-Score of 8 out of 9, and three earnings beats in the last four quarters is currently blocked from a clean entry by a confirmed death cross, capitulation-level RSI of 26, and a confirmed downtrend—the underlying business quality is compelling, but technical conditions argue for patience until momentum stabilizes.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 6.9 |
| P/S | 6.2 |
| EV/EBITDA | 4.7 |
| Fwd P/E | 7.1 |
| PEG | 3.4 |
| Analyst target | 7.5 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 5.9 |
| ROA | 7.6 |
| Gross margin | 5.5 |
| Op margin | 10.0 |
| Net margin | 10.0 |
| Current ratio | 5.4 |
| FCF quality | 5.0 |
| Moat | 5.0 |
| Piotroski F | 8.9 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 3.0 |
| EPS growth | 2.5 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 4.5 |
| MACD | 6.1 |
| OBV | 10.0 |
| MA position | 1.0 |
| Volume | 0.4 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 7.0 |
| Price target | 9.2 |
| erm sentiment | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 5.1 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 4.3 |
| quality rank | 8.2 |
| growth rank | 2.4 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 7.5 |
| support resistance | 6.6 |
| 52w position | 1.3 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 7.4 |
| days to cover | 7.3 |
| volatility | 3.1 |
| put call | 8.3 |
| implied vol | 3.2 |
| beta | 6.9 |
| debt equity | 4.9 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 6.7 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 4.5 |
Multiple concerning factors. Consider reducing position.
L4:PATH_F_SELLnone
SetupRecovery — Death cross but MACD improving, RSI 42
EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified
SuitabilitySpeculative — Drawdown -43% (>40% off 52w high)
The F-path SELL output reflects an overall score of 4.9 below the 5.6 soft trigger — multiple weakening dimensions accumulated rather than a single hard-floor breach. The strongest dimension ( Sentiment at 7.2) was not enough to lift the adjusted overall above the threshold. Co-occurring failed gates ( MOMENTUM:4.4<4.5, DEATH_CROSS:HARD_BLOCK) reinforce the read. Current asymmetry R:R is 3.09 — supplementary context, not the trigger for this path.
The strongest dimensions are Sentiment at 7.2, Quality at 7.0, and Value at 6.0; the weakest are Growth at 2.8, Momentum at 4.4, and Insider at 5.0. The V9 engine flagged 2 failed gates, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 3.09 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifNet margin compresses below 25% for 2 consecutive reported quarters from the current 33% level.
Trip ifEPS surprise falls below 0% for 2 consecutive quarters.
Trip ifMomentum score rises above 4.5 and the 200-day moving average slope turns positive (above 0%/30d) for 2 consecutive months.
Trip ifU.S. segment revenue concentration falls below 75% of total revenue for 2 consecutive annual reporting periods.