Skip to main content
CPACCementos Pacasmayo S.A.A.Buy Wait6.8·$11.95+0.34%
CPAC · Why this verdict

Why Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. (CPAC) is rated BUY WAIT

Updated

Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Show full disclosure ▾

About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.

Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.

Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.

No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.

No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.

Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.

Methodology · Editorial policy & full disclaimer

VerdictBUY WAIT
Overall score6.8/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis

Engine thesis — one sentence

Cementos Pacasmayo shows a strong growth profile and a technical breakout, but the engine flags a cyclical earnings trap with a roughly 75% expected earnings decline, an already-reached analyst target with negative risk-reward, a failed momentum gate, and an unsafe dividend yield, keeping conviction and position sizing at essentially zero.

Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.

Thesis pillars

The bear case flags earnings expected to decline roughly 75% off a cyclical peak, and the engine separately warns of a cyclical trap where the forward P/E of 77.4x sits far above the trailing 19x multiple, implying today's trailing earnings are not sustainable.

Deteriorating
Warnings
Expectation
If this risk holds, expect trailing earnings to fall materially and the forward P/E to stay elevated relative to trailing over the next few reported quarters.

CounterThe quality notes show excellent cash conversion (130% FCF/NI) and a strong Piotroski F-score of 7 out of 9, so the underlying balance sheet may be resilient enough to weather a cyclical earnings downturn without much value destruction.

The bull case cites a strong growth profile, and growth scores 7.7 overall with the earnings-growth component maxed at 10.0.

Improving
Bull case
Expectation
The growth score should hold above 7 if the growth profile persists over the next 12 months.

CounterThis 'strong growth' reading directly conflicts with the separately flagged expectation of a roughly 75% earnings decline off a cyclical peak, suggesting the growth score may be capturing trailing momentum right before a downturn rather than a sustainable trajectory.

The engine's risk-reward gate failed with a negative asymmetry ratio of -1.03, since the analyst target has already been reached, leaving the take-profit set by a nearby resistance level with modeled downside (14.4%) exceeding upside.

Deteriorating
Bear case
Expectation
If this holds, expect the stock to trade capped near its resistance-based target without a new, higher analyst target being set over the next 12 months.

CounterStrong cash generation and a solid quality profile could support a re-rating that establishes new resistance and analyst targets above current levels.

The technical setup shows a golden-cross breakout with RSI at 67 and a bullish MACD, yet momentum failed the engine's gate at 4.4 versus a 4.5 threshold.

Improving
Engine gate (failed)
Expectation
For the breakout to be confirmed, momentum needs to climb just above the 4.5 threshold over the next 12 months.

CounterThe momentum notes also flag falling on-balance volume, meaning the breakout may lack the volume confirmation needed to clear the threshold.

The catalyst notes flag a yield-trap warning, describing the dividend as high-yield but unsafe, adding a distinct income-sustainability risk on top of the cyclical earnings concern.

Improving
Catalyst breakdown
Expectation
If this risk holds, expect the dividend to be cut or the safety flag to persist over the next several quarters.

CounterThe dividend-safety component itself scores a moderate 4.2, not the lowest possible reading, suggesting the risk, while real, may not be imminent.

Per-dimension breakdown

Value

8.1/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
P/E7.5
P/S10.0
EV/EBITDA9.8
Fwd P/E8.3
PEG10.0
Analyst target4.0
  • Forward P/E: 14.0x
  • PEG: 0.23
  • Attractively valued

Quality

6.6/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
ROE5.3
ROA6.7
Gross margin4.0
Op margin9.8
Net margin4.7
Current ratio4.6
FCF quality10.0
Moat6.1
Piotroski F7.8
  • Excellent cash conversion: 208% FCF/NI
  • Strong Piotroski F-Score: 7/9

Growth

8.2/10data confidence 67%
ComponentSub-score
Rev growth6.3
EPS growth10.0

Momentum

6.3/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
RSI5.5
MACD3.5
OBV10.0
MA position9.0
Volume3.6
  • Volume accumulation (rising OBV)
  • Above 200-day MA

Sentiment

6.4/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
LLM sentiment7.0
Analyst rating6.1
Price target6.0
  • LLM news sentiment: +0.40 (n=1)
  • Light analyst coverage (3.0) — signal dampened

Insider

7.3/10data confidence 75%
ComponentSub-score
materiality5.0
holder change10.0
notable moves7.0
  • No net insider activity — $0 (0.000% of mkt cap)
  • Institutions accumulating

Peer rank

5.3/10data confidence 80%
ComponentSub-score
value rank8.2
quality rank5.0
growth rank6.4

Technical

5.3/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
bollinger3.1
support resistance4.0
52w position8.8

Risk (lower is worse)

7.8/10data confidence 80%
ComponentSub-score
short interest10.0
days to cover10.0
volatility6.2
debt equity4.9

Catalyst

3.6/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
earnings history3.3
earnings timing5.0
surprise avg0.0
dividend safety4.8
news activity5.0
  • Yield trap warning: high yield but unsafe

How the verdict was assembled

Engine trigger

Maintain position. Not compelling to add more. | News modifier +1 (HOLD_IF_HOLDING → STRONG_BUY_WAIT).

Engine technical detail
verdict_path: L4:PATH_F_HOLD|L3:NEWS_MOD=+1
Passed (7)
  • MOMENTUM:6.3>=5.5
  • INSIDER:OK
  • 8K:CLEAN
  • NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
  • EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:96d clear
  • SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
  • MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (1)
  • ASYMMETRY:-1.8=NEGATIVE
Warning (0)

none

Reward-to-Risk
-1.79
Upside
-9.0%
Downside
5.0%
Sizing output
STARTER

SetupRange Bound RSI 51 mid-range, Bollinger mid-band

EdgeInst Constrain Small cap ($1.0B) below institutional reach

SuitabilityAggressive MCap $1.0B<$5B

Investment implication

None of the engine's positive-conviction paths (C-quality, D-momentum) triggered — the F-path HOLD reflects balanced signals. Strongest-cleared gate: MOMENTUM:6.3>=5.5. Top dim: Growth at 8.2; weakest: Catalyst at 3.6. No conviction either direction.

The strongest dimensions are Growth at 8.2, Value at 8.1, and Risk (lower is worse) at 7.8; the weakest are Catalyst at 3.6, Technical at 5.3, and Peer rank at 5.3. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -1.79 and an engine sizing output of STARTER.

What would invalidate the thesis

Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.

  • P1Cyclical Earnings Peak Trap

    Trip ifTrailing earnings decline by less than 20%, well short of the expected 75% cyclical drop.

  • P2Strong Growth Profile

    Trip ifGrowth score falls below 4.0 from the current 7.7 as the cyclical earnings decline takes hold.

  • P3Target Reached Negative Asymmetry

    Trip ifAsymmetry ratio rises above 1.0, clearing into positive territory from the current -1.03 reading.

  • P4Failed Momentum Gate In Breakout

    Trip ifMomentum score rises above 4.5, clearing the engine's gate from the current 4.4 reading.

  • P5Yield Trap Warning

    Trip ifDividend-safety score rises above 7.0 from the current 4.2, or the payout is maintained without a cut for 4 consecutive quarters.

Engine reasoning is mechanically derived from pipeline gate outputs. See decision view.

Home Stocks CPAC Why this verdict