Value
5.7/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 4.6 |
| P/S | 6.8 |
| EV/EBITDA | 4.3 |
| Fwd P/E | 6.1 |
| PEG | 9.1 |
| Analyst target | 3.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 21.1x
- ▸PEG: 0.66
CP · Why this verdict
Why Canadian Pacific Kansas City Li (CP) is rated SELL
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Show full disclosure ▾Hide full disclosure ▴
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
VerdictSELL
Overall score5.2/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
Thesis pillars
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
The railroad generates operating margins of 27% and a Piotroski financial-health score of 7 out of 9 — a margin profile consistent with a durable infrastructure franchise that retains pricing power across the economic cycle. Quality breakdown | Operating margin holds above 25% over the next four quarters even as revenue recovery remains slow, confirming that the current -2% revenue decline is not triggering meaningful margin compression. | →Stable |
| CounterFree cash flow is converting at only 47% of net income — a flag that earnings quality may be lower than the headline margins suggest; combined with declining revenue, the strong operating margins may be masking deteriorating underlying cash generation. | ||
Three straight quarters of earnings misses, averaging roughly 1.4% below consensus, suggest the company is navigating a persistent headwind to estimates — a quiet pattern that tends to suppress analyst confidence and delay positive re-rating even when the absolute figures remain solid. Earnings | If the operational picture improves, EPS surprise turns positive above 0% for at least 2 of the next 3 reported quarters, confirming the miss streak has reversed. | →Stable |
| CounterThe misses have been narrow and consistent from an in-line quarter through three small misses; with the stock trading near a 52-week high and above its 200-day moving average, the market appears to be looking through near-term shortfalls and focusing on long-term franchise value. | ||
With only 0.5% upside to the technical resistance target and a risk/reward ratio of 0.1-to-1, the current price geometry does not justify initiating or adding to a position — the potential reward is a fraction of the realistic downside. Price targets | A more constructive setup would emerge if the stock pulls back and the upside-to-target expands beyond 10%, restoring a risk/reward ratio above 1.5-to-1. | →Stable |
| CounterStocks trading near 52-week highs and within reach of technical targets can continue higher as price discovery lifts resistance; if analysts raise their targets in response to improving sentiment, the current geometry may resolve upward rather than through a pullback. | ||
Despite trading above the 200-day moving average and near a 52-week high, on-balance volume is in distribution and MACD has deteriorated — a divergence between price and internals that often signals the rally is narrowing and near-term upside is limited. Momentum breakdown | Momentum recovers when MACD turns positive and OBV shifts back to accumulation over the next two quarters, validating that the price strength is supported by broad participation. | →Stable |
| CounterVolume distribution near a 52-week high can reflect institutional rebalancing rather than structural selling; the above-200-day-MA position and mid-range RSI suggest the broader trend remains intact despite the OBV divergence. | ||
The railroad generates operating margins of 27% and a Piotroski financial-health score of 7 out of 9 — a margin profile consistent with a durable infrastructure franchise that retains pricing power across the economic cycle.
→StableQuality breakdown
- Expectation
- Operating margin holds above 25% over the next four quarters even as revenue recovery remains slow, confirming that the current -2% revenue decline is not triggering meaningful margin compression.
CounterFree cash flow is converting at only 47% of net income — a flag that earnings quality may be lower than the headline margins suggest; combined with declining revenue, the strong operating margins may be masking deteriorating underlying cash generation.
Three straight quarters of earnings misses, averaging roughly 1.4% below consensus, suggest the company is navigating a persistent headwind to estimates — a quiet pattern that tends to suppress analyst confidence and delay positive re-rating even when the absolute figures remain solid.
→StableEarnings
- Expectation
- If the operational picture improves, EPS surprise turns positive above 0% for at least 2 of the next 3 reported quarters, confirming the miss streak has reversed.
CounterThe misses have been narrow and consistent from an in-line quarter through three small misses; with the stock trading near a 52-week high and above its 200-day moving average, the market appears to be looking through near-term shortfalls and focusing on long-term franchise value.
With only 0.5% upside to the technical resistance target and a risk/reward ratio of 0.1-to-1, the current price geometry does not justify initiating or adding to a position — the potential reward is a fraction of the realistic downside.
→StablePrice targets
- Expectation
- A more constructive setup would emerge if the stock pulls back and the upside-to-target expands beyond 10%, restoring a risk/reward ratio above 1.5-to-1.
CounterStocks trading near 52-week highs and within reach of technical targets can continue higher as price discovery lifts resistance; if analysts raise their targets in response to improving sentiment, the current geometry may resolve upward rather than through a pullback.
Despite trading above the 200-day moving average and near a 52-week high, on-balance volume is in distribution and MACD has deteriorated — a divergence between price and internals that often signals the rally is narrowing and near-term upside is limited.
→StableMomentum breakdown
- Expectation
- Momentum recovers when MACD turns positive and OBV shifts back to accumulation over the next two quarters, validating that the price strength is supported by broad participation.
CounterVolume distribution near a 52-week high can reflect institutional rebalancing rather than structural selling; the above-200-day-MA position and mid-range RSI suggest the broader trend remains intact despite the OBV divergence.
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis
Engine thesis — one sentence
Canadian Pacific Kansas City's 27% operating margins and strong balance sheet reflect an industrial franchise of real quality, but the stock is trading just 0.5% below its technical target with a risk/reward ratio of 0.1-to-1, three straight earnings misses, and deteriorating price internals — a combination that makes holding more defensible than adding.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
Per-dimension breakdown
Quality
5.8/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 2.8 |
| ROA | 2.9 |
| Gross margin | 6.8 |
| Op margin | 10.0 |
| Net margin | 10.0 |
| Current ratio | 2.7 |
| FCF quality | 3.7 |
| Moat | 5.4 |
| Piotroski F | 7.8 |
- ▸Strong margins: 27%
- ▸Earnings quality RED FLAG: 47% FCF/NI
- ▸No competitive moat
- ▸Strong Piotroski F-Score: 7/9
Growth
5.2/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 1.9 |
| EPS growth | 8.4 |
- ▸Declining revenue: -2%
Momentum
4.1/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 5.5 |
| MACD | 3.4 |
| OBV | 1.0 |
| MA position | 9.0 |
| Volume | 1.5 |
- ▸Volume distribution (falling OBV)
- ▸Above 200-day MA
Sentiment
6.0/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 7.1 |
| Price target | 5.5 |
| erm sentiment | 5.0 |
Insider
5.0/10data confidence 50%Peer rank
3.8/10data confidence 80%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 3.3 |
| quality rank | 4.4 |
| growth rank | 2.2 |
Technical
6.2/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 4.5 |
| support resistance | 4.7 |
| 52w position | 9.3 |
Risk (lower is worse)
7.4/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 9.1 |
| days to cover | 5.1 |
| volatility | 6.7 |
| put call | 10.0 |
| implied vol | 7.2 |
| beta | 6.1 |
| debt equity | 7.9 |
Catalyst
3.6/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 0.0 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 1.8 |
| dividend safety | 6.0 |
- ▸Earnings concerns: 0B/3M
- ▸Dividend: 78.0%
How the verdict was assembled
Engine trigger
Multiple concerning factors. Consider reducing position.
Engine technical detail
verdict_path:
L4:PATH_F_SELLPassed (6)
- INSIDER:OK
- 8K:CLEAN
- NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
- EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:24d clear
- SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
- MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (2)
- MOMENTUM:4.1<4.5
- ASYMMETRY:-2.0=NEGATIVE
Warning (0)
none
Reward-to-Risk
-2.01
Upside
-10.1%
Downside
5.0%
Sizing output
AVOID
SetupRange Bound — RSI 43 mid-range, Bollinger mid-band
EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityModerate — Balanced profile
Investment implication
The F-path SELL output reflects an overall score of 5.2 below the 5.6 soft trigger — multiple weakening dimensions accumulated rather than a single hard-floor breach. The strongest dimension ( Risk (lower is worse) at 7.4) was not enough to lift the adjusted overall above the threshold. Co-occurring failed gates ( MOMENTUM:4.1<4.5, ASYMMETRY:-2.0=NEGATIVE) reinforce the read. Current asymmetry R:R is -2.01 — supplementary context, not the trigger for this path.
The strongest dimensions are Risk (lower is worse) at 7.4, Technical at 6.2, and Sentiment at 6.0; the weakest are Catalyst at 3.6, Peer rank at 3.8, and Momentum at 4.1. The V9 engine flagged 2 failed gates, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -2.01 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
What would invalidate the thesis
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
- P1Strong Margin Industrial Franchise
Trip ifOperating margin compresses below 22% for 2 consecutive quarters, indicating the strong-margin franchise is under structural pressure.
- P2Three Consecutive Earnings Misses
Trip ifEPS surprise exceeds 0% for 2 consecutive quarters, indicating the miss streak has reversed.
- P3Unfavorable Risk Reward Near Target
Trip ifUpside to technical target expands beyond 10% through a pullback or analyst target revision, restoring risk/reward above 1.5-to-1.
- P4Momentum Internals Weaken At Highs
Trip ifPrice breaks above the 52-week high with OBV rising and MACD positive for 3 consecutive weeks, falsifying the distribution-at-highs thesis.