Value
5.9/10data confidence 83%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 0.0 |
| P/S | 8.2 |
| Fwd P/E | 5.4 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 6.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 23.4x
- ▸PEG: 0.04
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Clearfield's revenue is declining -15% YoY, a headwind directly weighing on the growth and quality scores. Growth breakdown | Revenue growth should stabilize above -5% YoY over the next several quarters. | →Stable |
| CounterCommunication equipment suppliers often see lumpy revenue tied to large customer order cycles, and a single down year may not indicate a structural decline. | ||
Clearfield's quality score of 2.1 sits below the 4.0 floor, compounded by 2 of 5 value-trap signals: high leverage at a 3.0 debt-to-equity ratio and material insider selling. Bear case | Quality score should climb back above 3.0 as leverage declines and insider selling subsides. | →Stable |
| CounterA single elevated debt-to-equity ratio combined with routine insider sales doesn't necessarily indicate a genuine value trap if the underlying business stabilizes. | ||
Insiders have sold $968,097 in shares over the past 90 days, representing 0.210% of market cap, which the engine flags as moderate-severity insider selling. Insider breakdown | Insider selling should decline from the current 0.21% of market cap pace. | →Stable |
| Counter0.21% of market cap remains a modest absolute dollar amount that could reflect routine diversification rather than a signal about company prospects. | ||
The momentum check failed at 3.2, below the 4.5 threshold, though the engine separately frames the RSI of 31 as an uptrend pullback rather than a trend reversal. Engine gate (failed) | Momentum score should recover above 4.5 while the stock remains above its 200-day moving average. | →Stable |
| CounterThe engine's own momentum note explicitly calls this a buying opportunity within a pullback, not confirmed weakness. | ||
The stock shows an elevated put/call ratio of 1.80 alongside 13% short interest, indicating bearish positioning in the options and short markets. Risk breakdown | The put/call ratio should decline from the current 1.80 level as bearish positioning unwinds. | →Stable |
| CounterA high put/call ratio can also reflect hedging activity by long shareholders rather than outright bearish speculation. | ||
CounterCommunication equipment suppliers often see lumpy revenue tied to large customer order cycles, and a single down year may not indicate a structural decline.
CounterA single elevated debt-to-equity ratio combined with routine insider sales doesn't necessarily indicate a genuine value trap if the underlying business stabilizes.
Counter0.21% of market cap remains a modest absolute dollar amount that could reflect routine diversification rather than a signal about company prospects.
CounterThe engine's own momentum note explicitly calls this a buying opportunity within a pullback, not confirmed weakness.
CounterA high put/call ratio can also reflect hedging activity by long shareholders rather than outright bearish speculation.
Clearfield's quality sits below the engine's floor amid declining revenue, notable insider selling, and an elevated put/call ratio, though the recent RSI pullback is framed by the engine as a buying opportunity within an ongoing uptrend.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 0.0 |
| P/S | 8.2 |
| Fwd P/E | 5.4 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 6.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 0.4 |
| ROA | 0.0 |
| Gross margin | 2.8 |
| Op margin | 0.0 |
| Net margin | 0.0 |
| Current ratio | 5.0 |
| Moat | 3.1 |
| Piotroski F | 5.6 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 0.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 8.4 |
| MACD | 0.0 |
| OBV | 1.0 |
| MA position | 4.0 |
| Volume | 0.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
| Price target | 8.7 |
| erm sentiment | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 3.0 |
| insider conviction | 2.0 |
| holder change | 5.1 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 3.6 |
| quality rank | 2.1 |
| growth rank | 0.4 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 10.0 |
| support resistance | 9.9 |
| 52w position | 2.6 |
| gap | 6.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 3.6 |
| days to cover | 6.9 |
| volatility | 0.0 |
| put call | 1.3 |
| implied vol | 0.0 |
| max pain risk | 3.0 |
| beta | 3.0 |
| debt equity | 0.5 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 0.0 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 0.0 |
Quality below minimum threshold.
L1:HARD_BLOCKSetup— — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed
EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityAggressive — Beta 2.11>1.3, MCap $0.5B<$5B
The L1 gate blocked the positive-verdict path: a hard-floor threshold was breached, so dimensional pillars — including Technical at 7.1 could not lift the engine output above the verdict floor. Failed gate signal: MOMENTUM:2.7<4.5.
The strongest dimensions are Technical at 7.1, Sentiment at 6.2, and Value at 5.9; the weakest are Growth at 0.0, Peer rank at 2.0, and Quality at 2.1. The V9 engine flagged 2 failed gates with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 0.86 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifQuality score stays below 2.5 for 2 more consecutive quarters.
Trip ifInsider selling exceeds 0.5% of market cap in a single quarter.
Trip ifMomentum score falls further below 2.5, confirming trend reversal rather than pullback.
Trip ifPut/call ratio rises above 2.5.
Trip ifRevenue decline exceeds -20% YoY.