Value
6.6/10data confidence 83%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 6.1 |
| P/S | 8.3 |
| EV/EBITDA | 3.5 |
| Fwd P/E | 5.4 |
| PEG | 8.7 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 23.7x
- ▸PEG: 0.72
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
CompX International has a pristine balance sheet and a 3.2% dividend, but weak momentum, consecutive earnings misses and a 23.2x forward multiple with no identified edge make it an avoid for now.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Momentum at 3.1 is below the engine's 4.5 threshold, with falling on-balance volume showing distribution despite the price holding above its 200-day average. Momentum breakdown | Momentum should recover above 4.5 with rising volume within ~12 months for the setup to improve. | — |
| CounterThe stock still sits above its 200-day moving average and is range-bound, so the weak score may reflect consolidation rather than a real downtrend. | ||
The company has posted consecutive earnings misses (2), signalling weak near-term execution against analyst expectations. Bear case | EPS should meet or beat estimates in the next reports, starting with the 2026-11-04 release. | — |
| CounterEstimates for a small-cap with lumpy quarters can be noisy, and one beat in the four-quarter window shows misses are not uniform. | ||
Earnings quality is flagged with free cash flow at only 74% of net income, so reported profits are not fully converting to cash. Quality breakdown | Free cash flow should rise toward net income over ~12 months if the gap is timing-related. | Tripped— |
| CounterA 74% conversion is still solid in absolute terms and may reflect working-capital or capex timing rather than weak earnings. | ||
The company carries conservative debt levels and a perfect 9/9 Piotroski F-Score, supporting a 3.2% dividend and resilience through a downturn. Peer-rank breakdown | Financial-strength scores and debt levels should stay at current levels through the next 12 months. | — |
| CounterA strong balance sheet does not create returns on its own, and the lack of any identified edge means it may simply sit in a range. | ||
A forward P/E of 23.2x leaves little valuation cushion, and the engine finds no clear edge with upside exhausted, supporting an avoid sizing. Valuation breakdown | A re-rating or a clear earnings catalyst should emerge before the multiple looks justified. | — |
| CounterA PEG of 0.70 suggests growth could justify the multiple, and the stock may re-rate if earnings accelerate. | ||
CounterThe stock still sits above its 200-day moving average and is range-bound, so the weak score may reflect consolidation rather than a real downtrend.
CounterEstimates for a small-cap with lumpy quarters can be noisy, and one beat in the four-quarter window shows misses are not uniform.
CounterA 74% conversion is still solid in absolute terms and may reflect working-capital or capex timing rather than weak earnings.
CounterA strong balance sheet does not create returns on its own, and the lack of any identified edge means it may simply sit in a range.
CounterA PEG of 0.70 suggests growth could justify the multiple, and the stock may re-rate if earnings accelerate.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 6.1 |
| P/S | 8.3 |
| EV/EBITDA | 3.5 |
| Fwd P/E | 5.4 |
| PEG | 8.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 5.0 |
| ROA | 6.7 |
| Gross margin | 2.4 |
| Op margin | 8.2 |
| Net margin | 6.8 |
| Current ratio | 6.3 |
| FCF quality | 5.6 |
| Moat | 6.2 |
| Piotroski F | 10.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 4.5 |
| EPS growth | 8.6 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 5.5 |
| MACD | 0.0 |
| OBV | 5.4 |
| MA position | 9.0 |
| Volume | 0.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 5.0 |
| notable moves | 7.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 4.3 |
| quality rank | 4.5 |
| growth rank | 3.6 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 2.7 |
| support resistance | 2.9 |
| 52w position | 9.0 |
| gap | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 8.4 |
| days to cover | 7.0 |
| volatility | 0.0 |
| beta | 7.9 |
| debt equity | 10.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| earnings history | 1.1 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 0.0 |
| dividend safety | 4.2 |
Multiple concerning factors. Consider reducing position.
L4:PATH_F_SELLSetup— — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed
EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityAggressive — MCap $0.5B<$5B
The F-path SELL output reflects an overall score of 4.9 below the 5.6 soft trigger — multiple weakening dimensions accumulated rather than a single hard-floor breach. The strongest dimension ( Risk (lower is worse) at 6.7) was not enough to lift the adjusted overall above the threshold. Co-occurring failed gates ( MOMENTUM:4.0<4.5) reinforce the read. Current asymmetry R:R is 0.00 — supplementary context, not the trigger for this path.
The strongest dimensions are Risk (lower is worse) at 6.7, Value at 6.6, and Growth at 6.5; the weakest are Catalyst at 2.6, Momentum at 4.0, and Technical at 4.9. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 0.00 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifMomentum score rises above 4.5 from the current 3.1.
Trip ifEPS surprise exceeds 5% for 2 consecutive quarters.
Trip ifFree cash flow rises above 90% of net income from the current 74%.
Trip ifPiotroski F-Score falls below 6 from the current 9.
Trip ifForward P/E falls below 18x from the current 23.2x.