oil and condensate
“10-K Item 1A: 'Approximately 52% of our 2025 oil and natural gas revenues were derived from oil and condensate sales.'”
Updated
The most significant concentration Black Stone Minerals discloses is oil and condensate at 52%, classified HIGH by disclosed size. Below: the full set from the latest 10-K — verbatim quotes, filing references, and a synthesis of what these exposures mean together.
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
Source: Black Stone Minerals’s SEC Form 10-K filed — view the filing on SEC EDGAR ↗
Each card carries a disclosed-size chip (HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW — how large the exposure is as a share of revenue, not how dangerous it is) and a nature tag: Built-in(the company’s own model, geography, or products) or Outside party (an external customer, supplier, or distributor it relies on).
“10-K Item 1A: 'Approximately 52% of our 2025 oil and natural gas revenues were derived from oil and condensate sales.'”
“10-K Item 1A: 'Approximately 48% of our 2025 oil and natural gas revenues were derived from natural gas and natural gas liquids sales.'”
“10-K Item 1A: 'In 2025, we generated 13% of our royalty revenues and 14% of our working interest revenues from three operators in the Shelby Trough area of the Haynesville play in East Texas'”
The company's concentration profile is dominated by commodity mix, with the two main revenue streams splitting across oil and condensate on one side and natural gas and natural gas liquids on the other. Approximately 52% of 2025 oil and natural gas revenues were derived from oil and condensate sales, a high-share structural exposure, while approximately 48% came from natural gas and natural gas liquids, a medium-share structural exposure. Because both are structural — reflecting the composition of the underlying royalty acreage rather than any counterparty relationship — the primary risk channel is commodity price volatility, not single-name dependency. A sustained divergence between oil and gas prices would shift revenue mix but would not eliminate a segment entirely. Layered beneath is a modest sub-basin operator concentration: in 2025, the company generated 13% of its royalty revenues and 14% of its working interest revenues from three operators in the Shelby Trough area of the Haynesville play in East Texas, a low-share geographic exposure by disclosed size. That dependency is more idiosyncratic than the commodity exposures — a change in drilling pace by those three operators could reduce activity in that basin — but its low share limits the portfolio-level effect. On balance, this is a manageable concentration profile for a diversified mineral royalty partnership. The dominant exposures are structural and commodity-linked; the one operator dependency is disclosed but small.
For the engine’s reasoning on BSM’s current verdict — including which dimensions drove the score — see the per-dimension breakdown.
| Symbol | Name | HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BKV | BKV Corporation | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| CNX | CNX Resources Corporation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| CHRD | Chord Energy Corporation | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| BSM● | Black Stone Minerals, L.P. | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| APA | APA Corporation | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| AR | Antero Resources Corporation | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Concentration counts reflect items disclosed in each peer’s most recent 10-K; disclosed-size classification uses TrendMatrix’s internal 10-K extraction taxonomy.