Value
6.9/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 8.5 |
| Fwd P/E | 9.2 |
| PEG | 4.1 |
| Analyst target | 4.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 10.7x
- ▸PEG: 2.41
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results. How we score · Editorial policy
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. People who build TrendMatrix, or entities they control, may hold positions, long or short, in securities it covers, and may trade them at any time. Positions are not disclosed individually. Verdicts are generated by an automated model applied by the same rules to every covered stock, and are not adjusted for any position held by the people who build TrendMatrix. We do not accept payment from issuers for coverage.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
Banco Santander Chile has strong 47% margins and a 4.8% dividend at a 10.2x forward P/E, but a weak 2/9 Piotroski score, declining revenue (-5%) and a price already at the analyst target leave a low-quality, oversold setup.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Banco Santander Chile earns strong margins of 47% and ranks best-in-class for margins and superior ROE versus peers. Peer-rank breakdown | Net margin stays above 40% and the quality rank vs peers stays above 8 out of 10. | →Stable |
| CounterThe Piotroski F-Score is only 2/9 and there is no competitive moat, so strong margins may reflect cyclical rate benefits rather than durable quality. | ||
Revenue is declining 5% and the Piotroski F-Score is a weak 2/9, which pushed the quality score to 3.7, below the 4.0 floor. Growth breakdown | Revenue decline narrows to better than -2% and Piotroski F-Score rises above 4. | →Stable |
| CounterGrowth ranks near the bottom among peers (0.6 out of 10), so a turnaround would need a shift in the Chilean credit cycle. | ||
RSI near 30, the lower Bollinger band and an extreme gap down of 6.2% set up an oversold bounce, while the 200-day average is still rising at +1.2% per 30 days. Momentum breakdown | RSI recovers above 40 and price holds above the $28.99 stop level. | ↑Improving |
| CounterFalling OBV shows volume distribution, and a gap down can mark the start of a larger downtrend rather than a reversal. | ||
Price of $30.53 is slightly above the analyst target of $30.41 (upside -0.4%), so there is no consensus upside to support a purchase. Analyst target | Analysts raise targets above $33 as earnings stabilize. | →Stable |
| CounterWith 5.1% downside to the stop and risk-to-reward of -0.08, any weakness reduces the total return from the 4.8% dividend. | ||
A 4.8% dividend at a 10.2x forward P/E offers income support, though dividend safety scores only 4.5 out of 10. Catalyst breakdown | Dividend is maintained at or above the current 4.8% yield over 12 months. | ↓Deteriorating |
| CounterWith revenue falling 5% and a weak Piotroski score, the dividend may be cut if earnings decline further. | ||
CounterThe Piotroski F-Score is only 2/9 and there is no competitive moat, so strong margins may reflect cyclical rate benefits rather than durable quality.
CounterGrowth ranks near the bottom among peers (0.6 out of 10), so a turnaround would need a shift in the Chilean credit cycle.
CounterFalling OBV shows volume distribution, and a gap down can mark the start of a larger downtrend rather than a reversal.
CounterWith 5.1% downside to the stop and risk-to-reward of -0.08, any weakness reduces the total return from the 4.8% dividend.
CounterWith revenue falling 5% and a weak Piotroski score, the dividend may be cut if earnings decline further.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 8.5 |
| Fwd P/E | 9.2 |
| PEG | 4.1 |
| Analyst target | 4.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 7.8 |
| ROA | 1.0 |
| Gross margin | 0.0 |
| Op margin | 0.0 |
| Net margin | 10.0 |
| Moat | 4.8 |
| Piotroski F | 2.2 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 1.4 |
| EPS growth | 1.2 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 5.5 |
| MACD | 8.5 |
| OBV | 10.0 |
| MA position | 7.0 |
| Volume | 0.1 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
| Price target | 5.8 |
| erm sentiment | 5.5 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 4.4 |
| quality rank | 9.8 |
| growth rank | 0.8 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 0.7 |
| support resistance | 0.5 |
| 52w position | 8.2 |
| gap | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 9.7 |
| days to cover | 8.4 |
| volatility | 5.5 |
| implied vol | 4.5 |
| max pain risk | 5.0 |
| beta | 10.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 0.0 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 2.5 |
| dividend safety | 4.5 |
Quality below minimum threshold.
L1:HARD_BLOCK:QUALITY_FLOORnone
Setup— — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed
EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityModerate — Balanced profile
The SELL_IF_HOLDING verdict reflects the ASYMMETRY gate's -0.8=NEGATIVE outcome against Risk (lower is worse) at 7.2 and asymmetric R:R of -0.77.
The strongest dimensions are Risk (lower is worse) at 7.2, Value at 6.9, and Momentum at 6.2; the weakest are Growth at 1.3, Catalyst at 3.4, and Technical at 3.6. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -0.77 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifNet margin falls below 35% from the current 47%.
Trip ifRevenue decline exceeds 10% YoY from the current -5%.
Trip ifShare price falls below $28.99, the stop level, from the current $30.53.
Trip ifConsensus analyst target falls below $28.00 from the current $30.41.
Trip ifDividend yield drops to less than 3% because of a dividend cut from the current 4.8%.