Value
6.0/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 6.3 |
| P/S | 10.0 |
| EV/EBITDA | 4.3 |
| Fwd P/E | 6.9 |
| PEG | 4.4 |
| Analyst target | 5.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 18.3x
- ▸PEG: 2.07
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
With only 0.9% headroom to the price target and a risk/reward of roughly 0.15-to-1, the current setup offers minimal compensation for nearly six times as much downside risk as potential upside—a geometry that leaves no margin of safety at current prices. Price targets | A decline of at least 8% from current levels that resets the reward-to-risk ratio above 1.5 would be needed to rebuild an actionable entry geometry. | →Stable |
| CounterAnalyst sentiment scores 6.4 with an analyst rating of 7.5, suggesting the professional consensus views the medium-term risk/reward more favorably than the current technical target geometry implies; target revisions upward could change the picture rapidly. | ||
Business quality registers at 3.4 against a 4.0 minimum floor, driven by extremely thin operating and net margins, an absence of competitive moat, and a weak FCF conversion rate—conditions that limit the company's pricing power and ability to defend earnings if the competitive environment tightens. Warnings | The overall quality measure should recover above 4.0 on two consecutive quarterly reviews, supported by operating margin expansion above 3%, for the quality case to become viable. | →Stable |
| CounterDiscount retail structurally operates on thin gross margins, and a 28% return on equity signals that capital is being deployed efficiently within those constraints—the quality score may be penalizing the business model rather than poor execution within it. | ||
Free cash flow represents only 16% of reported net income—a significant red flag indicating that most of the accounting profit is not converting into real cash—a concern for a business model that depends on efficient inventory management and membership fee economics to sustain returns. Quality | Free cash flow should recover to at least 50% of net income over four quarters to suggest the gap between earnings and real cash generation is narrowing meaningfully. | →Stable |
| CounterDiscount retailers frequently constrain free cash flow during periods of store expansion or inventory investment; a single-year gap between earnings and FCF may reflect a deliberate growth investment cycle rather than structural impairment of the cash model. | ||
The company has beaten consensus earnings estimates in each of the last four consecutive quarters with an average positive surprise of roughly 5%, demonstrating a consistent pattern of delivering results above market expectations across multiple business environments. Earnings | EPS surprises should remain positive over the next two quarters to sustain the beat track record and maintain analyst confidence in forward guidance. | →Stable |
| CounterThe magnitude of individual beats has been modest—ranging from roughly 3% to 7%—which may reflect conservative consensus management rather than genuine outperformance of the underlying business, leaving limited room for sentiment uplift if guidance is raised. | ||
A death cross has been confirmed and registered as a hard technical block, with the 200-day moving average declining at roughly 2% per 30 days—conditions that historically extend price weakness before a sustainable recovery can take hold, even when shorter-term indicators are improving. Engine gate (failed) | The 200-day moving average slope should turn positive and the stock should reclaim and hold above its 200-day moving average for the technical picture to clear sufficiently to support re-entry. | →Stable |
| CounterMACD is improving and RSI is at 64, suggesting shorter-term momentum is recovering; the faster indicators may be leading a turn that the slower moving average has not yet confirmed, and the setup may be classifying as early-stage recovery rather than sustained downtrend. | ||
CounterAnalyst sentiment scores 6.4 with an analyst rating of 7.5, suggesting the professional consensus views the medium-term risk/reward more favorably than the current technical target geometry implies; target revisions upward could change the picture rapidly.
CounterDiscount retail structurally operates on thin gross margins, and a 28% return on equity signals that capital is being deployed efficiently within those constraints—the quality score may be penalizing the business model rather than poor execution within it.
CounterDiscount retailers frequently constrain free cash flow during periods of store expansion or inventory investment; a single-year gap between earnings and FCF may reflect a deliberate growth investment cycle rather than structural impairment of the cash model.
CounterThe magnitude of individual beats has been modest—ranging from roughly 3% to 7%—which may reflect conservative consensus management rather than genuine outperformance of the underlying business, leaving limited room for sentiment uplift if guidance is raised.
CounterMACD is improving and RSI is at 64, suggesting shorter-term momentum is recovering; the faster indicators may be leading a turn that the slower moving average has not yet confirmed, and the setup may be classifying as early-stage recovery rather than sustained downtrend.
BJ's Wholesale Club has delivered four consecutive earnings beats averaging roughly 5% above estimates, but business quality falls below the minimum threshold, a death cross has confirmed a downtrend with the 200-day moving average declining at 2% per 30 days, and less than 1% headroom to the price target at a 0.15-to-1 risk/reward make this an unattractive entry at current levels.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 6.3 |
| P/S | 10.0 |
| EV/EBITDA | 4.3 |
| Fwd P/E | 6.9 |
| PEG | 4.4 |
| Analyst target | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 9.3 |
| ROA | 4.5 |
| Gross margin | 0.0 |
| Op margin | 1.5 |
| Net margin | 1.3 |
| Current ratio | 2.9 |
| FCF quality | 1.2 |
| Moat | 5.4 |
| Piotroski F | 4.4 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 5.0 |
| EPS growth | 1.5 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 4.5 |
| MACD | 10.0 |
| OBV | 1.0 |
| MA position | 1.0 |
| Volume | 3.2 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 7.5 |
| Price target | 7.2 |
| erm sentiment | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 4.5 |
| insider conviction | 2.0 |
| holder change | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 5.8 |
| quality rank | 3.9 |
| growth rank | 5.6 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 6.0 |
| support resistance | 5.7 |
| 52w position | 5.2 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 6.4 |
| days to cover | 7.3 |
| volatility | 5.2 |
| put call | 0.0 |
| implied vol | 5.9 |
| max pain risk | 3.0 |
| beta | 10.0 |
| debt equity | 4.3 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 10.0 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 5.1 |
Quality below minimum threshold.
L1:HARD_BLOCKnone
SetupRecovery — Death cross but MACD improving, RSI 42
EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityModerate — Balanced profile
The L1 gate blocked the positive-verdict path: a hard-floor threshold was breached, so dimensional pillars — including Sentiment at 6.7 could not lift the engine output above the verdict floor. Failed gate signal: MOMENTUM:3.9<4.5.
The strongest dimensions are Sentiment at 6.7, Catalyst at 6.3, and Value at 6.0; the weakest are Growth at 3.2, Quality at 3.4, and Insider at 3.8. The V9 engine flagged 3 failed gates, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 0.68 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifEPS surprise falls below 0% for 2 consecutive quarters.
Trip ifThe 200-day moving-average slope rises above 0% and price holds above the 200-day moving average for 2 consecutive months.
Trip ifFree cash flow rises above 50% of net income for 2 consecutive quarters.
Trip ifReward-to-risk ratio rises above 1.5 following a price decline greater than 8%.
Trip ifQuality score rises above 4.0 on 2 consecutive quarterly refreshes.