Arestin®
“10-K Item 1: 'Arestin® ... represents approximately 95% of Dentistry revenues'”
Updated
The most significant concentration Bausch Health Companies discloses is Arestin® at 95%, classified HIGH by disclosed size. Below: the full set from the latest 10-K — verbatim quotes, filing references, and a synthesis of what these exposures mean together.
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
Source: Bausch Health Companies’s SEC Form 10-K filed — view the filing on SEC EDGAR ↗
Each card carries a disclosed-size chip (HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW — how large the exposure is as a share of revenue, not how dangerous it is) and a nature tag: Built-in(the company’s own model, geography, or products) or Outside party (an external customer, supplier, or distributor it relies on).
“10-K Item 1: 'Arestin® ... represents approximately 95% of Dentistry revenues'”
“10-K Item 1: 'Sales of the Xifaxan® product line currently represent approximately 85% of the Salix segment revenues.'”
“10-K Item 1A: 'our dependence on a limited number of sources for certain of our finished products and raw materials'”
The company's concentration profile is defined by deep product-level revenue dependencies within two of its largest segments, making segment revenues highly leveraged to the performance of individual drug franchises. Within the Dentistry segment, Arestin represents approximately 95% of segment revenues, a high-share structural concentration that leaves the segment essentially as a single-product business; any competitive threat, generic entry, or volume shift in that product would move segment results proportionally. The pattern is similar in the Salix segment, where Xifaxan currently represents approximately 85% of segment revenues, another high-share structural exposure tied to a single branded pharmaceutical franchise. The two segment-level concentrations are independent in their drug-specific risk profiles — the therapeutic areas and patient populations differ — but they share a common vulnerability: both reflect situations where the company has not yet built meaningful revenue diversification within the segment to buffer against brand-specific headwinds. Generic, biosimilar, or competitive erosion at either franchise would have an outsized segment impact compared with a more diversified portfolio. On the supply side, the company depends on a limited number of sources for certain finished products and raw materials, a medium-share dependency that applies across the broader portfolio. While the specific inputs are not individually quantified, supply concentration in pharmaceuticals typically introduces lead-time and redundancy risk. Together, the profile is dominated by product concentration rather than customer or geographic risk — the variables most worth monitoring are intellectual property life cycle and competitive dynamics at the franchise level.
For the engine’s reasoning on BHC’s current verdict — including which dimensions drove the score — see the per-dimension breakdown.
| Symbol | Name | HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ANIP | ANI Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| BHC● | Bausch Health Companies Inc. | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| AMLX | Amylyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| AMRX | Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| BCRX | BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| ALKS | Alkermes plc | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Concentration counts reflect items disclosed in each peer’s most recent 10-K; disclosed-size classification uses TrendMatrix’s internal 10-K extraction taxonomy.