Value
7.7/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 4.9 |
| P/S | 10.0 |
| EV/EBITDA | 6.3 |
| Fwd P/E | 8.3 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 6.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 14.1x
- ▸PEG: 0.17
- ▸Attractively valued
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
The stock screens attractively valued at a forward multiple of 13.3 times and a price-to-growth ratio of 0.16, and the two most recent quarters each beat estimates — the latest by 17% and the prior quarter by over 100% — suggesting that the business may have turned a corner relative to depressed expectations. Valuation breakdown | Earnings beats continue for at least 2 more consecutive quarters and analyst price targets are revised upward, narrowing the current 29% gap to consensus. | →Stable |
| CounterThe prior two quarters each missed estimates, and the average surprise over the full four-quarter window is skewed by a single outsized beat; with revenue declining 2% and light analyst coverage dampening signal quality, the recent beats may reflect conservative estimates rather than business acceleration. | ||
Despite reported earnings, the company's free cash flow is negative — running roughly 23% below net income on a cash basis — and business quality sits below the minimum acceptable floor, undermining the reliability of headline profitability and suggesting that earnings may not be converting into durable shareholder value. Quality breakdown | Free cash flow turns positive and the quality score rises above 4.0 over the next four reported quarters, demonstrating that earnings are backed by real cash generation. | →Stable |
| CounterA strong Piotroski score of 7 out of 9 signals underlying balance-sheet health, and the attractive forward multiple of 13.3 times may adequately compensate for the current cash-flow shortfall if earnings continue recovering. | ||
One business segment accounts for 71% of revenue and a single product category represents 60% of sales, creating acute concentration risk where any demand disruption in either dimension could disproportionately impair the entire enterprise. Bear case | The revenue contribution from the dominant segment falls below 60% over the next 12 months as the company diversifies its customer or product mix. | →Stable |
| CounterHigh concentration in a dominant segment can also reflect genuine competitive strength and pricing power within that niche; a market leader in a focused category can earn above-average returns if the segment itself is healthy. | ||
Despite a confirmed downtrend — the stock is below its 200-day moving average with the average slope still negative — short-term momentum indicators are improving: MACD is turning positive, RSI is at 64, and on-balance volume is rising; this early recovery pattern could resolve into a trend reversal if sustained. Momentum breakdown | The stock crosses back above its 200-day moving average and the moving average slope turns positive within the next 6 months, confirming the recovery is more than a technical bounce. | →Stable |
| CounterDeath crosses in cyclical commodity sectors frequently produce multiple false recoveries before the genuine trend change; a softening lumber market or housing demand pullback could reassert the downtrend before the recovery firms up. | ||
CounterThe prior two quarters each missed estimates, and the average surprise over the full four-quarter window is skewed by a single outsized beat; with revenue declining 2% and light analyst coverage dampening signal quality, the recent beats may reflect conservative estimates rather than business acceleration.
CounterA strong Piotroski score of 7 out of 9 signals underlying balance-sheet health, and the attractive forward multiple of 13.3 times may adequately compensate for the current cash-flow shortfall if earnings continue recovering.
CounterHigh concentration in a dominant segment can also reflect genuine competitive strength and pricing power within that niche; a market leader in a focused category can earn above-average returns if the segment itself is healthy.
CounterDeath crosses in cyclical commodity sectors frequently produce multiple false recoveries before the genuine trend change; a softening lumber market or housing demand pullback could reassert the downtrend before the recovery firms up.
Boise Cascade trades at an attractive valuation and shows early momentum recovery after a prolonged downtrend, but negative free cash flow, below-floor business quality, and acute customer and product concentration risk limit the constructive case to a watch-only stance until quality and cash flow improve.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 4.9 |
| P/S | 10.0 |
| EV/EBITDA | 6.3 |
| Fwd P/E | 8.3 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 6.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 1.8 |
| ROA | 1.9 |
| Gross margin | 0.0 |
| Op margin | 0.7 |
| Net margin | 0.9 |
| Current ratio | 9.3 |
| FCF quality | 0.0 |
| Moat | 4.6 |
| Piotroski F | 7.8 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 1.9 |
| EPS growth | 10.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 5.0 |
| MACD | 10.0 |
| OBV | 1.0 |
| MA position | 8.0 |
| Volume | 1.1 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
| Price target | 7.8 |
| erm sentiment | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 5.1 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 3.8 |
| quality rank | 2.5 |
| growth rank | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 3.4 |
| support resistance | 4.0 |
| 52w position | 6.2 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 7.5 |
| days to cover | 7.6 |
| volatility | 2.5 |
| put call | 0.0 |
| implied vol | 3.4 |
| beta | 6.8 |
| debt equity | 8.9 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 3.3 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 10.0 |
| dividend safety | 7.0 |
Quality below minimum threshold.
L1:HARD_BLOCKSetupMomentum Cont — Trend continuation, RSI 61, MACD bullish
EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityAggressive — MCap $2.7B<$5B
The L1 gate blocked the positive-verdict path: a hard-floor threshold was breached, so dimensional pillars — including Value at 7.7 could not lift the engine output above the verdict floor. Failed gate signal: ASYMMETRY:0.5<1.5@spot.
The strongest dimensions are Value at 7.7, Catalyst at 6.1, and Growth at 6.0; the weakest are Quality at 3.0, Peer rank at 4.1, and Technical at 4.5. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate with 2 warnings, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 0.48 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifFree cash flow turns positive and quality score rises above 4.0 for 2 consecutive quarters.
Trip ifRevenue from the dominant segment falls below 60% of total revenue.
Trip ifStock price crosses above the 200-day moving average and holds for more than 30 days.
Trip ifEPS surprise falls below 0% for 2 consecutive quarters.