Value
3.8/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 1.9 |
| P/S | 5.1 |
| EV/EBITDA | 0.0 |
| Fwd P/E | 3.2 |
| PEG | 6.1 |
| Analyst target | 5.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 34.0x
- ▸PEG: 1.23
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results. How we score · Editorial policy
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. People who build TrendMatrix, or entities they control, may hold positions, long or short, in securities it covers, and may trade them at any time. Positions are not disclosed individually. Verdicts are generated by an automated model applied by the same rules to every covered stock, and are not adjusted for any position held by the people who build TrendMatrix. We do not accept payment from issuers for coverage.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
BlackBerry is a high-quality software business with a perfect 4-quarter earnings beat streak, 26% growth and a 9/9 Piotroski F-Score, but at $8.42 only 1.3% upside to the analyst target remains and momentum is weak at 3.6/10.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Quality is high with 172% FCF/NI cash conversion, a wide economic moat, a Rule of 40 reading of 49 and a Piotroski F-Score of 9/9. Quality breakdown | FCF/NI should stay above 100% and the Rule of 40 above 40 over the next 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterROE and ROA components are only 3.5 and 3.4, so returns on capital are modest relative to the headline quality score. | ||
Product concentration in QNX automotive is flagged as a risk, with 1 HIGH and 1 MED concentration risks and high implied volatility of 90%. Risk breakdown | QNX automotive share of revenue should not rise above current levels as the product base diversifies. | ↓Deteriorating |
| CounterQNX is an embedded software leader, so concentration reflects strength in a growing market rather than dependence on a weak line. | ||
BlackBerry beat EPS estimates in each of the last 4 quarters, including $0.07 against $0.04 expected in September 2026, a 75% surprise. Bull case | EPS should keep beating estimates over the next 4 quarters. | →Stable |
| CounterSurprise percentages are large because EPS estimates are only pennies, so small dollar beats overstate earnings power. | ||
Upside to the $8.53 analyst target is only 1.3% against 14.4% downside to the stop, a reward-to-risk of 0.09 at $8.42. Bear case | Price should pull back toward the $8.00 entry level or the analyst target should rise within 12 months. | ↓Deteriorating |
| CounterGrowth of 26% could drive upward target revisions, and price is above the 200-day average. | ||
Forward P/E is 35.7x with a PEG of 1.23, which is rich for the earnings level and flagged as a key risk. Valuation breakdown | Earnings growth should compress forward P/E below 25x over the next 12 months. | ↑Improving |
| CounterStrong 26% growth with high margins partly justifies a premium multiple. | ||
CounterROE and ROA components are only 3.5 and 3.4, so returns on capital are modest relative to the headline quality score.
CounterQNX is an embedded software leader, so concentration reflects strength in a growing market rather than dependence on a weak line.
CounterSurprise percentages are large because EPS estimates are only pennies, so small dollar beats overstate earnings power.
CounterGrowth of 26% could drive upward target revisions, and price is above the 200-day average.
CounterStrong 26% growth with high margins partly justifies a premium multiple.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 1.9 |
| P/S | 5.1 |
| EV/EBITDA | 0.0 |
| Fwd P/E | 3.2 |
| PEG | 6.1 |
| Analyst target | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 3.5 |
| ROA | 3.4 |
| Gross margin | 10.0 |
| Op margin | 9.1 |
| Net margin | 6.5 |
| Current ratio | 8.1 |
| FCF quality | 10.0 |
| Moat | 7.9 |
| Rule of 40 | 8.1 |
| Piotroski F | 10.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 9.0 |
| EPS growth | 10.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 5.5 |
| MACD | 2.1 |
| OBV | 1.0 |
| MA position | 4.0 |
| Volume | 0.5 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| LLM sentiment | 5.7 |
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
| Price target | 7.6 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 4.5 |
| insider conviction | 2.0 |
| holder change | 10.0 |
| notable moves | 7.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 2.5 |
| quality rank | 5.5 |
| growth rank | 7.1 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 7.8 |
| support resistance | 8.6 |
| 52w position | 2.1 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 7.0 |
| days to cover | 9.0 |
| volatility | 0.0 |
| put call | 0.0 |
| implied vol | 0.0 |
| max pain risk | 3.0 |
| beta | 5.9 |
| debt equity | 8.9 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 10.0 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 10.0 |
| news activity | 6.0 |
Growth is cheap relative to earnings, but the technical setup has not yet produced a breakout above resistance (PEG 1.23, quality 7.7/10, growth 9.5/10).
L4:PATH_C2_GARP_WAIT|ENTRY_STICKY:WITHIN_BANDnone
Setup— — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed
EdgeTemporary headwind — High quality (7.7) with weak momentum (2.6)
SuitabilityAggressive — MCap $4.7B<$5B
The C-path quality+growth combination triggered the STRONG_BUY_WAIT verdict: quality 7.7 and growth 9.5 both clear their thresholds, with asymmetric R:R of 0.28 supporting the read.
The strongest dimensions are Growth at 9.5, Quality at 7.7, and Catalyst at 7.2; the weakest are Momentum at 2.6, Value at 3.8, and Risk (lower is worse) at 4.2. The V9 engine flagged 2 failed gates, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 0.28 and an engine sizing output of STARTER.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifPiotroski F-Score falls below 6 of 9 from current 9.
Trip ifEPS misses estimates in at least 2 of the next 4 quarters.
Trip ifPrice falls below the $7.72 stop, more than 8% under the current $8.42.
Trip ifForward P/E exceeds 45x from current 35.7x.
Trip ifYear-over-year growth falls below 10% from current 26%.