Value
4.6/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 5.2 |
| P/S | 6.8 |
| EV/EBITDA | 3.0 |
| Fwd P/E | 6.2 |
| PEG | 4.0 |
| Analyst target | 3.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 20.9x
- ▸PEG: 2.56
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Free cash flow is negative—deeply so relative to reported net income—meaning earnings are not being converted into cash, which materially impairs the quality of the reported profit. Quality breakdown | Free cash flow turns positive and covers at least 50% of net income for 2 consecutive reported quarters. | →Stable |
| CounterRegulated water utilities make substantial upfront capital investments that depress near-term free cash flow while locking in rate-base growth; the cash burn may reflect planned infrastructure spend rather than a deteriorating business model. | ||
Three of the last four reported quarters came in below consensus—most recently by 7.4% and 2.3%—with only one intervening beat, signaling consistent difficulty meeting market expectations. Earnings | EPS beats consensus by more than 3% for 2 consecutive quarters, ending the miss pattern. | →Stable |
| CounterThe one beat of roughly 3% fell between recent misses and the oldest miss; if estimates have been sufficiently reset downward, a single quarter of improved execution could shift the narrative quickly. | ||
The current price sits above the take-profit level, resulting in a risk/reward of roughly -0.22 to 1; there is no favorable entry geometry at current levels and the setup favors patience rather than adding exposure. Price targets | Price pulls back below $120, creating at least 5% of upside to a revised take-profit and a ratio above 1.5 to 1. | →Stable |
| CounterIf the business achieves a regulatory rate increase the market has not yet priced, the take-profit ceiling could be revised upward, restoring favorable geometry without requiring a price correction. | ||
A dividend payout ratio of roughly 282% of earnings combined with negative free cash flow raises the question of whether the dividend can be sustained from internally generated funds over the medium term. Catalyst breakdown | Free cash flow covers the annual dividend at 100% or more for 2 consecutive quarters, removing the strain signal. | →Stable |
| CounterRegulated utilities routinely fund dividends through a combination of earnings, debt, and equity issuance within a predictable rate-case cycle; a high payout ratio alone does not confirm the dividend is at risk if regulators approve sufficient allowed returns. | ||
A leverage penalty has been flagged for a debt-to-equity ratio of 1.4 against a backdrop of soft earnings growth, limiting the cushion available if cash flows disappoint relative to debt-service requirements. Bear case | Debt-to-equity falls below 1.0 and earnings growth accelerates above 5% year-over-year for 2 consecutive quarters. | →Stable |
| CounterRegulated utilities typically carry high leverage as a structural feature; a debt-to-equity of 1.4 is within the range considered normal for rate-regulated infrastructure, and the regulated revenue stream provides stable collateral. | ||
CounterRegulated water utilities make substantial upfront capital investments that depress near-term free cash flow while locking in rate-base growth; the cash burn may reflect planned infrastructure spend rather than a deteriorating business model.
CounterThe one beat of roughly 3% fell between recent misses and the oldest miss; if estimates have been sufficiently reset downward, a single quarter of improved execution could shift the narrative quickly.
CounterIf the business achieves a regulatory rate increase the market has not yet priced, the take-profit ceiling could be revised upward, restoring favorable geometry without requiring a price correction.
CounterRegulated utilities routinely fund dividends through a combination of earnings, debt, and equity issuance within a predictable rate-case cycle; a high payout ratio alone does not confirm the dividend is at risk if regulators approve sufficient allowed returns.
CounterRegulated utilities typically carry high leverage as a structural feature; a debt-to-equity of 1.4 is within the range considered normal for rate-regulated infrastructure, and the regulated revenue stream provides stable collateral.
Free cash flow is negative and the stock has already exceeded the take-profit level, leaving no favorable risk/reward; three misses in the last four quarters and a payout ratio of roughly 282% of earnings compound the concern for holders considering whether to reduce exposure.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 5.2 |
| P/S | 6.8 |
| EV/EBITDA | 3.0 |
| Fwd P/E | 6.2 |
| PEG | 4.0 |
| Analyst target | 3.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 3.4 |
| ROA | 2.3 |
| Gross margin | 8.2 |
| Op margin | 10.0 |
| Net margin | 10.0 |
| Current ratio | 1.5 |
| FCF quality | 0.0 |
| Moat | 5.8 |
| Piotroski F | 6.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 3.9 |
| EPS growth | 1.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 4.1 |
| MACD | 10.0 |
| OBV | 10.0 |
| MA position | 7.5 |
| Volume | 5.6 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
| Price target | 5.0 |
| erm sentiment | 5.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 5.1 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 2.8 |
| quality rank | 5.6 |
| growth rank | 2.2 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 0.0 |
| support resistance | 0.0 |
| 52w position | 8.9 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 6.7 |
| days to cover | 5.9 |
| volatility | 6.9 |
| put call | 9.8 |
| implied vol | 5.6 |
| beta | 9.4 |
| debt equity | 4.2 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 0.0 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 1.3 |
| dividend safety | 6.5 |
Multiple concerning factors. Consider reducing position.
L4:PATH_F_SELLSetupRecovery — Death cross but MACD improving, RSI 79
EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityModerate — Balanced profile
The F-path SELL output reflects an overall score of 4.2 below the 5.6 soft trigger — multiple weakening dimensions accumulated rather than a single hard-floor breach. The strongest dimension ( Momentum at 7.4) was not enough to lift the adjusted overall above the threshold. Co-occurring failed gates ( ASYMMETRY:-1.2=NEGATIVE) reinforce the read. Current asymmetry R:R is -1.18 — supplementary context, not the trigger for this path.
The strongest dimensions are Momentum at 7.4, Risk (lower is worse) at 6.9, and Quality at 5.3; the weakest are Growth at 2.5, Technical at 3.0, and Catalyst at 3.6. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -1.18 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifFree cash flow turns positive and exceeds 50% of net income for 2 consecutive reported quarters.
Trip ifEPS surprise exceeds 3% for 2 consecutive quarters.
Trip ifPrice falls below $120, restoring at least 5% upside to the take-profit level.
Trip ifFree cash flow covers the annual dividend by more than 100% for 2 consecutive quarters.
Trip ifDebt-to-equity ratio falls below 1.0.