Skip to main content
AVALGrupo Aval Acciones y Valores SSell5.7·$4.33
AVAL · Why this verdict

Why Grupo Aval Acciones y Valores S (AVAL) is rated SELL

Updated

Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results. How we score · Editorial policy

Show full disclosure ▾

About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.

Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.

Conflicts and positions. People who build TrendMatrix, or entities they control, may hold positions, long or short, in securities it covers, and may trade them at any time. Positions are not disclosed individually. Verdicts are generated by an automated model applied by the same rules to every covered stock, and are not adjusted for any position held by the people who build TrendMatrix. We do not accept payment from issuers for coverage.

No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security.

No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.

Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.

Methodology · Editorial policy & full disclaimer

VerdictSELL
Overall score5.7/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL

Thesis pillars

Business quality is below the 4.0 floor at 3.3, with no competitive moat despite a Piotroski F-Score of 7 out of 9.

→Stable
Bear case
Expectation
Quality score recovers above 4.0 as profitability improves.

CounterA strong Piotroski score points to improving fundamentals, so low quality may reflect weak ROE rather than deteriorating trends.

Valuation is attractive, with a forward P/E of 7.0x and a PEG ratio of 0.42.

→Stable
Valuation breakdown
Expectation
Forward P/E stays below 9x while earnings grow.

CounterEmerging-market bank multiples carry country and currency risk, and quality is only 3.3, so the discount may be warranted.

Price of $4.43 is 2.1% above the $4.33 analyst target, so upside to the target is gone and reward-to-risk is negative.

→Stable
Upside pct
Expectation
Analyst targets are raised or the stock pulls back toward support.

CounterA 15% haircut was applied to the analyst target, which may understate the raw target.

EPS beat estimates in 2 of the last 4 quarters and missed once (0.16 versus 0.17 expected in August 2026), with an average surprise of 73.3% inflated by one large beat.

↑Improving
Earnings track record
Expectation
EPS meets or beats estimates at the 2026-11-10 report.

CounterThe 274% beat in February 2026 distorts the average, and the latest quarter was a miss, so earnings momentum is uneven.

Momentum is weak at 2.9 with falling on-balance volume and price below the 200-day average, though that average is still rising 2.5% over 30 days.

↓Deteriorating
Momentum breakdown
Expectation
Momentum score recovers above 4.5 and price reclaims the 200-day average.

CounterA rising 200-day average means this may be a pullback in an uptrend, and a dividend yield of 4.5% offers support.

Per-dimension breakdown

Value

9.4/10data confidence 50%
ComponentSub-score
P/E8.7
Fwd P/E9.7
PEG10.0
  • ▸Forward P/E: 6.8x
  • ▸PEG: 0.41
  • ▸Attractively valued

Quality

3.3/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
ROE3.3
ROA0.7
Gross margin0.0
Op margin0.0
Net margin6.1
Moat5.4
Piotroski F7.8
  • ▸No competitive moat
  • ▸Strong Piotroski F-Score: 7/9

Growth

6.2/10data confidence 67%
ComponentSub-score
Rev growth7.2
EPS growth5.3

Momentum

2.2/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
RSI3.0
MACD3.2
OBV1.0
MA position2.2
Volume1.7
  • ▸Capitulation risk (RSI 26, below 200MA)
  • ▸Volume distribution (falling OBV)
  • ▸Below 200-MA but MA still rising (+2.3%/30d) — pullback in uptrend, not confirmed weakness

Sentiment

5.8/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
Analyst rating5.0
Price target7.4
erm sentiment5.0

Insider

5.0/10data confidence 50%

Peer rank

5.0/10data confidence 80%
ComponentSub-score
value rank6.4
quality rank1.9
growth rank6.8

Technical

7.9/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
bollinger10.0
support resistance9.6
52w position4.2

Risk (lower is worse)

8.0/10data confidence 80%
ComponentSub-score
short interest9.9
days to cover9.1
volatility3.0
beta10.0

Catalyst

6.0/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
erm5.0
earnings history5.6
earnings timing5.0
surprise avg10.0
dividend safety4.5
  • ▸Earnings in 6 days
  • ▸Dividend: 4.6%

How the verdict was assembled

Engine trigger

Quality below minimum threshold.

Engine technical detail
verdict_path: L1:HARD_BLOCK:QUALITY_FLOOR
Passed (5)
  • INSIDER:OK
  • 8K:CLEAN
  • NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
  • SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
  • MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (3)
  • MOMENTUM:2.2<4.5
  • ASYMMETRY:0.0<1.5@spot
  • EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:6d<=7d
Warning (0)

none

Reward-to-Risk
0.02
Upside
+0.1%
Downside
7.6%
Sizing output
AVOID

Setup— — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed

EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified

SuitabilityModerate — Balanced profile

Investment implication

The SELL_IF_HOLDING verdict reflects the MOMENTUM gate's 2.2<4.5 outcome against Value at 9.4 and asymmetric R:R of 0.02.

The strongest dimensions are Value at 9.4, Risk (lower is worse) at 8.0, and Technical at 7.9; the weakest are Momentum at 2.2, Quality at 3.3, and Peer rank at 5.0. The V9 engine flagged 3 failed gates, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 0.02 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.

What would invalidate the thesis

Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.

  • P1Cheap Valuation Low Peg

    Trip ifForward P/E rises above 10x from the current 7.0x.

  • P2Price Above Analyst Target

    Trip ifPrice exceeds the analyst target by more than 10% from the current 2.1%.

  • P3Low Business Quality

    Trip ifQuality score falls below 3.0 from the current 3.3.

  • P4Mixed Earnings Record

    Trip ifEPS surprise stays below 0% for 2 consecutive quarters.

  • P5Downtrend Momentum

    Trip ifPrice drops below the $4.28 stop level from the current $4.43.

Engine reasoning is mechanically derived from pipeline gate outputs. See decision view.

Home › Stocks › AVAL › Why this verdict