Value
6.6/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 3.2 |
| P/S | 9.8 |
| EV/EBITDA | 3.4 |
| Fwd P/E | 6.6 |
| PEG | 7.9 |
| Analyst target | 7.5 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 19.5x
- ▸PEG: 0.84
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results. How we score · Editorial policy
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. People who build TrendMatrix, or entities they control, may hold positions, long or short, in securities it covers, and may trade them at any time. Positions are not disclosed individually. Verdicts are generated by an automated model applied by the same rules to every covered stock, and are not adjusted for any position held by the people who build TrendMatrix. We do not accept payment from issuers for coverage.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
Aramark offers 14.3% upside to the analyst target with reward-to-risk of 2.46 and solid momentum, but quality is below the 4.0 floor with no moat, thin margins and ongoing insider selling.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Quality scores 3.6, below the 4.0 floor, with no competitive moat and thin net margin, limiting durability of earnings. Quality breakdown | Quality rises above 4.0 as margins improve. | →Stable |
| CounterContract services businesses have recurring customer relationships that can produce stable cash flow even without a classic moat. | ||
Upside to the $61.68 analyst target is 14.3% against 5.8% downside, a reward-to-risk of 2.46, with analyst upside of 27% before haircut. Estimated upside | Price moves toward the $61.68 target over the next 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterThe analyst rating score of 8.72 is strong, but targets can be revised down if growth slows, and quality is below the minimum floor. | ||
Aramark beat in 2 of the last 4 quarters but missed by 12.7% in November 2025, for an average surprise of -0.6%, with the next report due November 16. Earnings | The November 16 report delivers a positive surprise. | →Stable |
| CounterThe last two reports beat, and the recent trend of improving surprises (0.3%, 2.7%, 7.2%) is positive. | ||
Momentum scores 6.9 with rising OBV volume accumulation and price above the 200-day average, and institutions are accumulating. Momentum breakdown | Momentum stays above 5.5 and price keeps holding above the 200-day average. | ↓Deteriorating |
| CounterThe put/call ratio component is extreme and short-interest-related risk scores are elevated, so sentiment could turn quickly. | ||
Insiders sold $4.31M across 2 sales in 90 days with no purchases, and 71.0% of revenue comes from the United States. Insider | Insider selling stops and net flow turns neutral. | →Stable |
| CounterThe selling is only 0.030% of market cap and U.S. concentration reflects the core market rather than a specific vulnerability. | ||
CounterContract services businesses have recurring customer relationships that can produce stable cash flow even without a classic moat.
CounterThe analyst rating score of 8.72 is strong, but targets can be revised down if growth slows, and quality is below the minimum floor.
CounterThe last two reports beat, and the recent trend of improving surprises (0.3%, 2.7%, 7.2%) is positive.
CounterThe put/call ratio component is extreme and short-interest-related risk scores are elevated, so sentiment could turn quickly.
CounterThe selling is only 0.030% of market cap and U.S. concentration reflects the core market rather than a specific vulnerability.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 3.2 |
| P/S | 9.8 |
| EV/EBITDA | 3.4 |
| Fwd P/E | 6.6 |
| PEG | 7.9 |
| Analyst target | 7.5 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 3.9 |
| ROA | 2.8 |
| Gross margin | 0.0 |
| Op margin | 1.8 |
| Net margin | 1.0 |
| Current ratio | 4.9 |
| FCF quality | 6.9 |
| Moat | 4.2 |
| Piotroski F | 6.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 4.8 |
| EPS growth | 8.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 7.9 |
| MACD | 0.6 |
| OBV | 1.0 |
| MA position | 4.0 |
| Volume | 1.3 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 8.7 |
| Price target | 8.9 |
| erm sentiment | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 4.5 |
| insider conviction | 2.0 |
| holder change | 8.4 |
| notable moves | 3.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 5.5 |
| quality rank | 4.9 |
| growth rank | 5.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 10.0 |
| support resistance | 9.0 |
| 52w position | 6.3 |
| gap | 6.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 8.5 |
| days to cover | 7.3 |
| volatility | 3.9 |
| put call | 10.0 |
| implied vol | 3.2 |
| max pain risk | 5.0 |
| beta | 6.3 |
| debt equity | 3.3 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 3.3 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 0.9 |
| dividend safety | 6.8 |
Quality below minimum threshold.
L1:HARD_BLOCK:QUALITY_FLOORSetup— — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed
EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityModerate — Balanced profile
The SELL_IF_HOLDING verdict reflects the MOMENTUM gate's 3.0<4.5 outcome against Sentiment at 7.8 and asymmetric R:R of 3.02.
The strongest dimensions are Sentiment at 7.8, Technical at 7.8, and Growth at 6.8; the weakest are Momentum at 3.0, Quality at 3.6, and Catalyst at 4.2. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 3.02 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifPrice falls below the $50.82 stop level, more than 5.8% below $53.96.
Trip ifQuality score stays below 3.6 for 2 consecutive quarters.
Trip ifEPS surprise falls below 0% in the November 16 report.
Trip ifMomentum score falls below 4.5 from current 6.9.
Trip ifInsider selling exceeds $10M over a 90-day window.