Value
7.5/10data confidence 83%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 9.2 |
| P/S | 8.9 |
| EV/EBITDA | 8.0 |
| Fwd P/E | 9.5 |
| Analyst target | 4.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 8.8x
- ▸Attractively valued
APAM · Why this verdict
Why Artisan Partners Asset Manageme (APAM) is rated BUY WAIT
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Show full disclosure ▾Hide full disclosure ▴
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
VerdictBUY WAIT
Overall score5.5/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
Thesis pillars
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
The business generates 23% operating margins and scores 8 out of 9 on the Piotroski financial health scale, reflecting consistent operational efficiency and balance-sheet integrity that rank among the strongest in asset management. Return on equity appears elevated at roughly 72%, though this figure is likely amplified by a buyback-reduced equity base rather than purely operational compounding. Quality breakdown | Operating margin remains above 20% and Piotroski score stays at 7 or above for each of the next 4 quarters. | →Stable |
| CounterAsset management margins are highly sensitive to assets-under-management levels, which fluctuate with market performance and client flows; a sustained market drawdown could simultaneously compress revenue and the multiple the market is willing to pay for the franchise. | ||
The stock is currently trading roughly 10% above analyst consensus price targets, meaning the market has priced in expectations that the median sell-side analyst does not believe are supported by near-term fundamentals — a precarious position for a name already in a confirmed technical downtrend. Warnings | Analyst consensus price targets are revised upward above $40 within 12 months, validating the premium the market is currently paying. | →Stable |
| CounterThe resistance-based take-profit level sits roughly 4% above current price with a risk/reward ratio of approximately 1.6-to-1 in favor of the bull case, suggesting some near-term technical room for appreciation even if the fundamental picture has temporarily run ahead of analyst models. | ||
With a death cross in place, the stock below all moving averages, RSI at 38, and MACD bearish, the technical configuration reflects a falling-knife pattern — a setup historically associated with continued downside before a durable reversal can be confirmed. Engine gate (failed) | Price crosses back above the 200-day moving average and holds for at least 4 consecutive weeks within 9 months, confirming the falling-knife phase has resolved. | →Stable |
| CounterVolume accumulation (rising OBV) is occurring even during the price decline, suggesting buyers are absorbing the selling at lower levels — a divergence between price and volume that can precede a reversal before price itself confirms the turn. | ||
After three consecutive quarterly beats reading from oldest to most recent — a modest 1% beat, then 5%, then 16% — the most recent quarter produced a 6% earnings miss, breaking the streak and raising questions about whether the guidance discipline that produced prior beats has slipped. Earnings | EPS beats resume for at least 3 consecutive quarters with surprise above 5% each, demonstrating the miss was a one-quarter anomaly rather than a trend inflection. | →Stable |
| CounterA 6% miss is modest in absolute terms, and a business with 23% margins and a Piotroski score of 8 out of 9 has demonstrated the financial resilience to absorb one-quarter disappointments without fundamental deterioration. | ||
The business generates 23% operating margins and scores 8 out of 9 on the Piotroski financial health scale, reflecting consistent operational efficiency and balance-sheet integrity that rank among the strongest in asset management. Return on equity appears elevated at roughly 72%, though this figure is likely amplified by a buyback-reduced equity base rather than purely operational compounding.
→StableQuality breakdown
- Expectation
- Operating margin remains above 20% and Piotroski score stays at 7 or above for each of the next 4 quarters.
CounterAsset management margins are highly sensitive to assets-under-management levels, which fluctuate with market performance and client flows; a sustained market drawdown could simultaneously compress revenue and the multiple the market is willing to pay for the franchise.
The stock is currently trading roughly 10% above analyst consensus price targets, meaning the market has priced in expectations that the median sell-side analyst does not believe are supported by near-term fundamentals — a precarious position for a name already in a confirmed technical downtrend.
→StableWarnings
- Expectation
- Analyst consensus price targets are revised upward above $40 within 12 months, validating the premium the market is currently paying.
CounterThe resistance-based take-profit level sits roughly 4% above current price with a risk/reward ratio of approximately 1.6-to-1 in favor of the bull case, suggesting some near-term technical room for appreciation even if the fundamental picture has temporarily run ahead of analyst models.
With a death cross in place, the stock below all moving averages, RSI at 38, and MACD bearish, the technical configuration reflects a falling-knife pattern — a setup historically associated with continued downside before a durable reversal can be confirmed.
→StableEngine gate (failed)
- Expectation
- Price crosses back above the 200-day moving average and holds for at least 4 consecutive weeks within 9 months, confirming the falling-knife phase has resolved.
CounterVolume accumulation (rising OBV) is occurring even during the price decline, suggesting buyers are absorbing the selling at lower levels — a divergence between price and volume that can precede a reversal before price itself confirms the turn.
After three consecutive quarterly beats reading from oldest to most recent — a modest 1% beat, then 5%, then 16% — the most recent quarter produced a 6% earnings miss, breaking the streak and raising questions about whether the guidance discipline that produced prior beats has slipped.
→StableEarnings
- Expectation
- EPS beats resume for at least 3 consecutive quarters with surprise above 5% each, demonstrating the miss was a one-quarter anomaly rather than a trend inflection.
CounterA 6% miss is modest in absolute terms, and a business with 23% margins and a Piotroski score of 8 out of 9 has demonstrated the financial resilience to absorb one-quarter disappointments without fundamental deterioration.
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis
Engine thesis — one sentence
Artisan Partners is a high-quality asset management franchise generating 23% operating margins, a Piotroski score of 8 out of 9, and three quarters of earnings beats — but the stock is currently trading roughly 10% above analyst consensus price targets in a confirmed falling-knife technical configuration, creating a challenging near-term setup despite the underlying business quality.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
Per-dimension breakdown
Quality
8.5/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 10.0 |
| ROA | 10.0 |
| Gross margin | 5.2 |
| Op margin | 10.0 |
| Net margin | 10.0 |
| Current ratio | 9.7 |
| FCF quality | 7.0 |
| Moat | 6.9 |
| Piotroski F | 7.8 |
- ▸Excellent ROE: 72%
- ▸Strong margins: 23%
- ▸Strong Piotroski F-Score: 7/9
- ▸High-quality business
Growth
2.6/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 4.8 |
| EPS growth | 0.5 |
Momentum
3.2/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 4.5 |
| MACD | 2.6 |
| OBV | 1.0 |
| MA position | 1.0 |
| Volume | 6.8 |
- ▸Volume distribution (falling OBV)
- ▸Below 200-MA, MA slope -2.5%/30d — confirmed downtrend
Sentiment
5.3/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
| Price target | 5.9 |
| erm sentiment | 5.0 |
Insider
5.0/10data confidence 50%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 5.1 |
- ▸No net insider activity — $0 (0.000% of mkt cap)
Peer rank
5.5/10data confidence 80%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 7.8 |
| quality rank | 6.9 |
| growth rank | 7.3 |
- ▸Superior ROE vs peers
Technical
5.7/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 5.3 |
| support resistance | 6.5 |
| 52w position | 6.0 |
| gap | 5.0 |
Risk (lower is worse)
5.6/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 5.7 |
| days to cover | 4.3 |
| volatility | 5.6 |
| put call | 10.0 |
| implied vol | 1.8 |
| beta | 4.4 |
| debt equity | 7.4 |
- ▸High IV: 69%
Catalyst
5.3/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 6.7 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 4.5 |
| dividend safety | 5.2 |
- ▸Strong earnings: 3B/1M
- ▸Dividend: 957.0%
How the verdict was assembled
Engine trigger
Fundamentals strong but target reached (-10.0% upside).
Engine technical detail
verdict_path:
L4:PATH_A_VALUE_MOS33|V8:TARGET_REACHED|ENTRY_STICKY:PRIOR_STILL_VIABLEPassed (6)
- INSIDER:OK
- 8K:CLEAN
- NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
- EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:25d clear
- SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
- MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (3)
- MOMENTUM:3.2<4.5
- ASYMMETRY:-1.8=NEGATIVE
- DEATH_CROSS:HARD_BLOCK
Warning (0)
none
Reward-to-Risk
-1.82
Upside
-10.0%
Downside
5.5%
Sizing output
STARTER
SetupRange Bound — RSI 49 mid-range, Bollinger mid-band
EdgeTemporary headwind — High quality (8.5) with weak momentum (3.2)
SuitabilityAggressive — Beta 1.67>1.3, MCap $2.5B<$5B
Investment implication
The STRONG_BUY_WAIT verdict reflects the MOMENTUM gate's 3.2<4.5 outcome against Quality at 8.5 and asymmetric R:R of -1.82.
The strongest dimensions are Quality at 8.5, Value at 7.5, and Technical at 5.7; the weakest are Growth at 2.6, Momentum at 3.2, and Insider at 5.0. The V9 engine flagged 3 failed gates, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -1.82 and an engine sizing output of STARTER.
What would invalidate the thesis
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
- P1High Quality Margin Profile
Trip ifOperating margin compresses below 15% for 2 consecutive quarters.
- P2Stock Above Analyst Consensus
Trip ifAnalyst consensus price target rises above $40 within 12 months.
- P3Falling Knife Technical Configuration
Trip ifPrice crosses back above the 200-day moving average and holds for 4 consecutive weeks.
- P4Recent Earnings Miss Breaks Streak
Trip ifEPS surprise exceeds 5% for 3 consecutive quarters.