Value
6.7/10data confidence 33%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 9.2 |
| Analyst target | 5.0 |
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Business quality sits well below the required threshold, with the company burning cash relative to revenue, no competitive moat, and a weak Piotroski F-Score of 2 out of 9. Quality breakdown | The quality score should recover above the 4.0 floor over the next 12 months as cash flow and financial-strength metrics improve. | →Stable |
| CounterSemiconductor companies often see quality metrics swing with the cycle, so a cyclical trough rather than structural impairment could explain the current weak reading. | ||
The balance sheet carries extreme leverage, with debt-to-equity near 48.8x, combined with negative operating margins, together flagged as value-trap warning signs. Bear case | Leverage should decline substantially and operating margins should move toward breakeven over the next 12 months for the value-trap concern to ease. | →Stable |
| CounterExtreme leverage ratios in semiconductors can sometimes reflect a temporarily depressed equity base during a cyclical downturn rather than unsustainable debt levels in absolute terms. | ||
Price momentum has failed the engine's minimum bar, with on-balance volume in a distribution pattern even though shares remain above the 200-day average. Momentum breakdown | Momentum should recover meaningfully over the next 12 months, with volume flows shifting back to accumulation. | →Stable |
| CounterDistribution-pattern volume alongside declining revenue can persist for an extended period if the semiconductor demand backdrop stays soft. | ||
Insider activity has turned bearish, with notable net selling of roughly $2.5 million over the past 90 days. Insider transaction read | The insider signal should turn neutral or bullish over the next 12 months as net insider activity shifts away from selling. | →Stable |
| CounterInsider selling of this size can reflect routine diversification or scheduled selling programs rather than a negative signal about company prospects. | ||
Recent earnings execution has been strong on a beat-rate basis, with three beats against one miss over the last four quarters and average surprises well above expectations. Catalyst breakdown | The beat rate should hold at 75% or better over the next 12 months, sustaining this recent execution strength. | →Stable |
| CounterOne of the four quarters was a very large miss, and the volatility in results makes the beat-rate track record less reliable as a forward signal than it appears. | ||
CounterSemiconductor companies often see quality metrics swing with the cycle, so a cyclical trough rather than structural impairment could explain the current weak reading.
CounterExtreme leverage ratios in semiconductors can sometimes reflect a temporarily depressed equity base during a cyclical downturn rather than unsustainable debt levels in absolute terms.
CounterDistribution-pattern volume alongside declining revenue can persist for an extended period if the semiconductor demand backdrop stays soft.
CounterInsider selling of this size can reflect routine diversification or scheduled selling programs rather than a negative signal about company prospects.
CounterOne of the four quarters was a very large miss, and the volatility in results makes the beat-rate track record less reliable as a forward signal than it appears.
AOSL shows a strong recent earnings beat rate, but extreme balance-sheet leverage, quality metrics well below the required floor, negative price momentum, and notable insider selling point to significant near-term risk.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 9.2 |
| Analyst target | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 0.0 |
| ROA | 0.0 |
| Gross margin | 0.5 |
| Op margin | 0.0 |
| Net margin | 0.0 |
| Current ratio | 9.7 |
| FCF quality | 0.0 |
| Moat | 2.5 |
| Piotroski F | 2.2 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 2.4 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 5.5 |
| MACD | 0.0 |
| OBV | 1.0 |
| MA position | 4.0 |
| Volume | 0.9 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 6.3 |
| Price target | 8.0 |
| erm sentiment | 5.1 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 3.0 |
| insider conviction | 2.0 |
| holder change | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 9.1 |
| quality rank | 1.1 |
| growth rank | 0.9 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 9.2 |
| support resistance | 9.0 |
| 52w position | 4.1 |
| gap | 4.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 5.0 |
| days to cover | 8.7 |
| volatility | 0.0 |
| put call | 6.2 |
| implied vol | 0.0 |
| max pain risk | 3.0 |
| beta | 1.5 |
| debt equity | 1.4 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 6.7 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 10.0 |
Quality below minimum threshold.
L1:HARD_BLOCKSetup— — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed
EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityAggressive — Beta 2.55>1.3, MCap $1.1B<$5B
The L1 gate blocked the positive-verdict path: a hard-floor threshold was breached, so dimensional pillars — including Value at 6.7 could not lift the engine output above the verdict floor. Failed gate signal: MOMENTUM:2.3<4.5.
The strongest dimensions are Value at 6.7, Catalyst at 6.7, and Technical at 6.6; the weakest are Quality at 1.7, Momentum at 2.3, and Growth at 2.4. The V9 engine flagged 2 failed gates with 2 warnings, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 0.30 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifDebt-to-equity ratio falls below 10x.
Trip ifQuality score exceeds 4.0 from the current 1.7.
Trip ifMomentum score rises above 6.0 from the current 2.7.
Trip ifInsider signal flips to bullish with net insider buying exceeding $500,000 in a rolling 90-day period.
Trip ifEarnings beat rate falls below 50% over the next 4 reported quarters.