Value
9.0/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 9.7 |
| EV/EBITDA | 5.6 |
| Fwd P/E | 9.9 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 5.9x
- ▸PEG: 0.01
- ▸Attractively valued
AMR · Why this verdict
Why Alpha Metallurgical Resources, (AMR) is rated SELL
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Show full disclosure ▾Hide full disclosure ▴
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
VerdictSELL
Overall score4.9/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
Thesis pillars
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Met coal accounts for approximately 96% of revenue while export revenues represent roughly 73% of the total—concentrating nearly the entire business in a single commodity exposed predominantly to non-domestic demand and leaving the financial profile highly sensitive to coking coal pricing and global steel production cycles. Bear case | Revenue from products or geographies outside met coal export growing to represent more than 20% of total would indicate meaningful diversification away from this single-point-of-failure exposure. | →Stable |
| CounterDeep specialization in a single commodity can be a strategic focus rather than a liability; if met coal prices recover, the near-pure-play structure would amplify revenue and earnings leverage to the upside with no dilution from lower-returning diversified businesses. | ||
Business quality sits well below the 4.0 minimum investment-grade threshold—with no identifiable competitive moat—limiting the buffer available if commodity conditions deteriorate and reducing the franchise's ability to earn through a downcycle. Quality breakdown | Business quality recovering above 4.0 out of 10 for 2 consecutive quarters would signal the fundamental profile is improving to an investable baseline. | →Stable |
| CounterPure-play commodity businesses often score low on moat metrics while generating substantial cash during price upswings; if met coal pricing strengthens, operating leverage could produce strong returns despite the structurally low quality score. | ||
Forward earnings are priced at approximately 6.8 times—with a PEG ratio near zero—suggesting the market has embedded significant earnings pessimism and leaving room for multiple expansion if demand conditions stabilize and estimates prove too conservative. Valuation breakdown | Forward P/E expanding above 10x as met coal prices stabilize would indicate the market is beginning to price in a recovery and the trough thesis is being validated. | →Stable |
| CounterTrough multiples in cyclical industries often compress further as earnings estimates continue to be cut; a 6.8x forward P/E is only attractive if the earnings denominator does not fall further, which is uncertain given the ongoing revenue decline noted in the growth metrics. | ||
On-balance volume is declining—indicating distribution rather than accumulation—and price momentum sits below the threshold for an actionable entry, consistent with sellers remaining in control despite the stock trading above its 200-day moving average. Momentum breakdown | OBV reversing to a rising trend for 4 consecutive weeks alongside price breaking above recent resistance would signal distribution has exhausted and momentum is recovering. | →Stable |
| CounterThe stock's continued hold above the 200-day moving average provides a longer-term structural floor; the current range-bound setup with declining OBV may reflect temporary seller exhaustion rather than the beginning of a persistent downtrend. | ||
Three of the past four quarters produced earnings beats averaging approximately 38% above consensus—with the most recent quarter delivering a result exactly at the estimate—an execution record that stands in contrast to the broader fundamental challenges and suggests management models the business conservatively. Earnings | A return to a positive earnings surprise in the upcoming quarter would confirm the execution discipline has not deteriorated. | →Stable |
| CounterThe in-line most recent quarter—following three substantial beats—may signal that expectations have been reset upward to a level where outperformance is harder to achieve, particularly if commodity revenues are under pressure. | ||
Met coal accounts for approximately 96% of revenue while export revenues represent roughly 73% of the total—concentrating nearly the entire business in a single commodity exposed predominantly to non-domestic demand and leaving the financial profile highly sensitive to coking coal pricing and global steel production cycles.
→StableBear case
- Expectation
- Revenue from products or geographies outside met coal export growing to represent more than 20% of total would indicate meaningful diversification away from this single-point-of-failure exposure.
CounterDeep specialization in a single commodity can be a strategic focus rather than a liability; if met coal prices recover, the near-pure-play structure would amplify revenue and earnings leverage to the upside with no dilution from lower-returning diversified businesses.
Business quality sits well below the 4.0 minimum investment-grade threshold—with no identifiable competitive moat—limiting the buffer available if commodity conditions deteriorate and reducing the franchise's ability to earn through a downcycle.
→StableQuality breakdown
- Expectation
- Business quality recovering above 4.0 out of 10 for 2 consecutive quarters would signal the fundamental profile is improving to an investable baseline.
CounterPure-play commodity businesses often score low on moat metrics while generating substantial cash during price upswings; if met coal pricing strengthens, operating leverage could produce strong returns despite the structurally low quality score.
Forward earnings are priced at approximately 6.8 times—with a PEG ratio near zero—suggesting the market has embedded significant earnings pessimism and leaving room for multiple expansion if demand conditions stabilize and estimates prove too conservative.
→StableValuation breakdown
- Expectation
- Forward P/E expanding above 10x as met coal prices stabilize would indicate the market is beginning to price in a recovery and the trough thesis is being validated.
CounterTrough multiples in cyclical industries often compress further as earnings estimates continue to be cut; a 6.8x forward P/E is only attractive if the earnings denominator does not fall further, which is uncertain given the ongoing revenue decline noted in the growth metrics.
On-balance volume is declining—indicating distribution rather than accumulation—and price momentum sits below the threshold for an actionable entry, consistent with sellers remaining in control despite the stock trading above its 200-day moving average.
→StableMomentum breakdown
- Expectation
- OBV reversing to a rising trend for 4 consecutive weeks alongside price breaking above recent resistance would signal distribution has exhausted and momentum is recovering.
CounterThe stock's continued hold above the 200-day moving average provides a longer-term structural floor; the current range-bound setup with declining OBV may reflect temporary seller exhaustion rather than the beginning of a persistent downtrend.
Three of the past four quarters produced earnings beats averaging approximately 38% above consensus—with the most recent quarter delivering a result exactly at the estimate—an execution record that stands in contrast to the broader fundamental challenges and suggests management models the business conservatively.
→StableEarnings
- Expectation
- A return to a positive earnings surprise in the upcoming quarter would confirm the execution discipline has not deteriorated.
CounterThe in-line most recent quarter—following three substantial beats—may signal that expectations have been reset upward to a level where outperformance is harder to achieve, particularly if commodity revenues are under pressure.
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis
Engine thesis — one sentence
The company screens attractively valued at approximately 6.8 times forward earnings with a near-zero PEG ratio, and management has demonstrated a track record of beating depressed earnings expectations, but the business derives roughly 96% of revenue from a single commodity with approximately 73% dependent on export markets, business quality sits well below the investment-grade floor, and price momentum is negative with volume distribution underway—making the setup a concentrated commodity bet with meaningful downside if coking coal conditions deteriorate.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
Per-dimension breakdown
Quality
2.0/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 0.0 |
| ROA | 0.0 |
| Gross margin | 0.0 |
| Op margin | 0.0 |
| Net margin | 0.0 |
| Current ratio | 9.3 |
| Moat | 2.5 |
| Piotroski F | 4.4 |
- ▸No competitive moat
- ▸Quality concerns
Growth
2.2/10data confidence 33%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 2.2 |
- ▸Declining revenue: -1%
Momentum
1.9/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 3.5 |
| MACD | 0.0 |
| OBV | 1.3 |
| MA position | 2.2 |
| Volume | 2.3 |
- ▸Volume distribution (falling OBV)
- ▸Below 200-MA but MA still rising (+3.7%/30d) — pullback in uptrend, not confirmed weakness
Sentiment
5.9/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
| Price target | 7.8 |
| erm sentiment | 5.0 |
- ▸Analyst upside: 22%
Insider
6.5/10data confidence 75%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 8.0 |
| insider conviction | 6.5 |
| holder change | 5.1 |
- ▸Notable insider buying — $3,940,080 (0.194% of mkt cap)
Peer rank
5.2/10data confidence 80%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 6.0 |
| quality rank | 6.0 |
| growth rank | 4.0 |
Technical
6.3/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 8.2 |
| support resistance | 9.6 |
| 52w position | 2.6 |
| gap | 5.0 |
Risk (lower is worse)
4.4/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 1.6 |
| days to cover | 4.3 |
| volatility | 0.0 |
| put call | 8.4 |
| implied vol | 1.2 |
| beta | 9.1 |
| debt equity | 6.2 |
- ▸High short interest justified: 19%
- ▸High IV: 73%
- ▸Concentration risks: 3 HIGH, 1 MED (10-K Item 1A — sized via position_sizing, validated via buy_confidence)
Catalyst
7.5/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 10.0 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 10.0 |
- ▸Strong earnings: 3B/0M
How the verdict was assembled
Engine trigger
Quality below minimum threshold.
Engine technical detail
verdict_path:
L1:HARD_BLOCKPassed (6)
- INSIDER:OK
- 8K:CLEAN
- NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
- EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:34d clear
- SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
- MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (2)
- MOMENTUM:1.9<4.5
- ASYMMETRY:0.3<1.5@spot
Warning (0)
none
Reward-to-Risk
0.29
Upside
+3.3%
Downside
11.6%
Sizing output
AVOID
Setup— — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed
EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityAggressive — MCap $2.0B<$5B
Investment implication
The L1 gate blocked the positive-verdict path: a hard-floor threshold was breached, so dimensional pillars — including Value at 9.0 could not lift the engine output above the verdict floor. Failed gate signal: MOMENTUM:1.9<4.5.
The strongest dimensions are Value at 9.0, Catalyst at 7.5, and Insider at 6.5; the weakest are Momentum at 1.9, Quality at 2.0, and Growth at 2.2. The V9 engine flagged 2 failed gates, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 0.29 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
What would invalidate the thesis
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
- P1Met Coal Export Concentration
Trip ifMet coal revenue falls below 80% of total revenue for 2 consecutive quarters.
- P2Quality Below Investment Grade
Trip ifBusiness quality score recovers above 4.0 out of 10 for 2 consecutive quarters.
- P3Attractive Valuation At Cyclical Trough
Trip ifForward P/E multiple expands above 12x from the current 6.8x.
- P4Negative Momentum Volume Distribution
Trip ifOBV reverses from declining to rising for 4 consecutive weeks and price closes above the 200-day moving average.
- P5Earnings Execution Before Inline Quarter
Trip ifEPS surprise falls below -10% for 2 consecutive quarters.