WT Microelectronics
“10-K Item 1A: 'the customer representing 10% or more of our revenue was WT Microelectronics Co., Ltd., or WT...accounted for approximately 70% of total revenue'”
Updated
The most significant concentration Ambarella discloses is WT Microelectronics at 70%, classified HIGH by disclosed size. Below: the full set from the latest 10-K — verbatim quotes, filing references, and a synthesis of what these exposures mean together.
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
Source: Ambarella’s SEC Form 10-K filed — view the filing on SEC EDGAR ↗
Each card carries a disclosed-size chip (HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW — how large the exposure is as a share of revenue, not how dangerous it is) and a nature tag: Built-in(the company’s own model, geography, or products) or Outside party (an external customer, supplier, or distributor it relies on).
“10-K Item 1A: 'the customer representing 10% or more of our revenue was WT Microelectronics Co., Ltd., or WT...accounted for approximately 70% of total revenue'”
“10-K Item 1A: 'revenue from our top 10 end customers...accounted for approximately 67% of our total revenue in fiscal year 2026'”
“10-K Item 1A: 'We operate a warehouse facility in Hong Kong through which the substantial majority of our finished SoCs are shipped to customers'”
The company's concentration profile is acute across both its distribution channel and its end-customer base, with a significant logistics dependency layered on top. The largest disclosed exposure is to WT Microelectronics Co., Ltd., a distributor that accounted for approximately 70% of total revenue — a high-share dependency where the relationship concentrates the entire revenue recognition and order-flow mechanism through a single intermediary. Revenue from the top ten end customers accounted for approximately 67% of total revenue in fiscal year 2026, also a high-share dependency that confirms the narrow demand base even at the end-customer level, which the distributor relationship somewhat obscures. The logistics infrastructure adds a further dependency: the substantial majority of finished products are shipped through a warehouse facility in Hong Kong, a high-share exposure that is structural in character since it reflects the geography of the company's supply chain, but operationally meaningful in that any disruption to that facility — geopolitical, logistical, or regulatory — would interrupt the channel through which most products reach customers. Together, these three claims describe a layered concentration: a single distributor capturing most of revenue, a narrow end-customer base within that distributor's book, and a single-geography warehouse through which nearly all physical product flows. A disruption at any one of these nodes — loss of the distributor relationship, reduced ordering from the top-ten end customers, or an access issue at the Hong Kong facility — could materially affect revenues without an obvious near-term offset.
For the engine’s reasoning on AMBA’s current verdict — including which dimensions drove the score — see the per-dimension breakdown.
| Symbol | Name | HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACLS | Axcelis Technologies, Inc. | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| ACMR | ACM Research, Inc. | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| AMBA● | Ambarella, Inc. | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| AMAT | Applied Materials, Inc. | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
| AMKR | Amkor Technology, Inc. | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| AXTI | AXT Inc | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Concentration counts reflect items disclosed in each peer’s most recent 10-K; disclosed-size classification uses TrendMatrix’s internal 10-K extraction taxonomy.