Value
6.3/10data confidence 83%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 4.9 |
| P/S | 4.6 |
| Fwd P/E | 8.0 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 4.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 15.1x
- ▸PEG: 0.21
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
The business generates 32% net margins, passes the Rule of 40 with a composite score of 44, and earns a Piotroski F-Score of 7 out of 9 — indicating a financially sound, well-run operation that covers its cost of capital comfortably. Quality breakdown | Net margins remain above 25% and the Rule of 40 score stays above 35 over the next 12 months, confirming durable profitability. | →Stable |
| CounterMidstream margins are contractually locked to a single upstream customer; if that customer reduces throughput volumes, apparent business quality could deteriorate rapidly despite the favorable current metrics. | ||
The company carries a high-severity single-customer concentration risk identified in its annual risk disclosures — a relationship where any volume reduction, credit stress, or renegotiation by the customer directly impairs throughput revenue with limited ability to replace it quickly. Bear case | A second customer formally contributes more than 25% of total annual revenues, materially reducing single-customer dependency. | →Stable |
| CounterLong-term midstream contracts typically include take-or-pay minimums and acreage dedications that make the relationship structurally stable regardless of shorter-term commodity cycles — limiting near-term cash flow risk even if the relationship is concentrated. | ||
The stock has reached its near-term resistance target with only about 3.6% upside remaining and a risk/reward ratio below 1-to-1 — technically unfavorable — while momentum has softened to a level that does not provide a strong directional signal in either direction. Warnings | Price falls below $19.00, creating more than 15% upside to the $22.10 resistance target and restoring a favorable risk/reward for entry. | →Stable |
| CounterThe stock trades above its 200-day moving average and the underlying business quality is strong; a modest price consolidation rather than a deeper pullback may be all that is needed before momentum re-accelerates. | ||
The put/call ratio stands at 2.17 and implied volatility is 60%, reflecting materially more protective hedging activity in the options market than call-side speculation — a sign that sophisticated market participants are positioning for near-term uncertainty or downside. Risk breakdown | Put/call ratio falls below 1.2 for 2 consecutive measurement periods, indicating hedging pressure has normalized. | →Stable |
| CounterFor high-yield midstream names, elevated put/call ratios often reflect income-oriented strategies such as covered calls and protective collars on existing long positions rather than directional bearish bets. | ||
CounterMidstream margins are contractually locked to a single upstream customer; if that customer reduces throughput volumes, apparent business quality could deteriorate rapidly despite the favorable current metrics.
CounterLong-term midstream contracts typically include take-or-pay minimums and acreage dedications that make the relationship structurally stable regardless of shorter-term commodity cycles — limiting near-term cash flow risk even if the relationship is concentrated.
CounterThe stock trades above its 200-day moving average and the underlying business quality is strong; a modest price consolidation rather than a deeper pullback may be all that is needed before momentum re-accelerates.
CounterFor high-yield midstream names, elevated put/call ratios often reflect income-oriented strategies such as covered calls and protective collars on existing long positions rather than directional bearish bets.
Antero Midstream operates a genuinely high-quality midstream business with strong margins and solid fundamentals, but single-customer concentration poses meaningful asymmetric downside risk, and the stock has reached its near-term resistance target with an unfavorable risk/reward at current prices — the setup rewards patience over immediate action.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 4.9 |
| P/S | 4.6 |
| Fwd P/E | 8.0 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 4.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 6.8 |
| ROA | 5.1 |
| Gross margin | 10.0 |
| Op margin | 10.0 |
| Net margin | 10.0 |
| Current ratio | 3.9 |
| FCF quality | 7.6 |
| Moat | 6.9 |
| Rule of 40 | 7.5 |
| Piotroski F | 7.8 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 4.6 |
| EPS growth | 10.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 5.0 |
| MACD | 8.2 |
| OBV | 1.0 |
| MA position | 9.0 |
| Volume | 2.5 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
| Price target | 5.8 |
| erm sentiment | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 4.5 |
| insider conviction | 2.0 |
| holder change | 5.1 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 1.7 |
| quality rank | 7.2 |
| growth rank | 3.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 2.8 |
| support resistance | 3.5 |
| 52w position | 9.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 8.3 |
| days to cover | 5.1 |
| volatility | 6.9 |
| put call | 3.9 |
| implied vol | 5.5 |
| beta | 9.3 |
| debt equity | 3.2 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 1.1 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 1.5 |
| dividend safety | 3.5 |
Multiple concerning factors. Consider reducing position.
L4:PATH_F_SELLSetupBreakout — Golden cross, above all MAs, RSI 66, MACD bullish
EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityModerate — Balanced profile
The F-path SELL output reflects an overall score of 4.6 below the 5.6 soft trigger — multiple weakening dimensions accumulated rather than a single hard-floor breach. The strongest dimension ( Quality at 7.6) was not enough to lift the adjusted overall above the threshold. Co-occurring failed gates ( ASYMMETRY:-1.3=NEGATIVE) reinforce the read. Current asymmetry R:R is -1.30 — supplementary context, not the trigger for this path.
The strongest dimensions are Quality at 7.6, Growth at 7.3, and Value at 6.3; the weakest are Peer rank at 3.0, Catalyst at 3.2, and Insider at 3.9. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -1.30 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifNet margin falls below 20% for 2 consecutive quarters.
Trip ifA second customer formally contributes more than 25% of total annual revenues per disclosure.
Trip ifPrice falls below $19.00, creating more than 15% upside to the $22.10 resistance target.
Trip ifPut/call ratio falls below 1.2 for 2 consecutive measurement periods.