Value
7.3/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 7.1 |
| P/S | 8.5 |
| EV/EBITDA | 4.5 |
| Fwd P/E | 9.2 |
| PEG | 8.9 |
| Analyst target | 5.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 10.3x
- ▸PEG: 0.69
- ▸Attractively valued
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
The three most recent quarters all missed consensus EPS estimates, with the most recent delivering a 34.5% shortfall versus expectations; only the oldest quarter in the four-period window managed a beat, signaling a meaningful deterioration in earnings predictability. Earnings | At least two of the next three quarters beat EPS estimates, signaling a return to the execution quality that the oldest quarter in the current window once reflected. | →Stable |
| CounterA series of misses driven by cyclical demand or input cost timing can reverse sharply as those factors normalize; if the shortfalls reflect lumpy one-time items rather than structural margin compression, the recent run may overstate the underlying deterioration. | ||
Approximately 76% of revenue is generated in North America, and the five largest OEM customers account for more than half of total sales — leaving the business unusually exposed to a regional slowdown or the renegotiation or loss of a key customer relationship. Bear case | Non-North-American revenue grows to represent more than 30% of total over the next two years, meaningfully reducing geographic concentration. | →Stable |
| CounterA dominant North American market share can reflect genuine competitive advantage rather than a lack of diversification; deep integration with major OEM customers may represent a switching-cost moat rather than a vulnerability. | ||
Free cash flow represents only 7% of reported net income — a deeply concerning gap suggesting that the vast majority of accounting earnings are not converting into distributable cash, raising questions about whether the dividend payout is genuinely covered by operating cash generation. Quality breakdown | FCF as a percentage of net income rises above 50% within four quarters as capital expenditure or working capital dynamics normalize, demonstrating that the earnings are not illusory. | →Stable |
| CounterA temporary FCF-to-net-income gap can arise from elevated capital investment cycles or working capital timing; if the gap closes as capex normalizes, the apparent cash quality concern may prove transient rather than structural. | ||
The stock has reached the analyst consensus price target, leaving essentially no headroom at current levels; with the risk/reward unfavorable at this price and earnings execution deteriorating, the setup does not support adding new exposure. Warnings | Analyst consensus price target rises more than 15% above current price within six months, driven by upward earnings revisions that restore a meaningful margin of safety. | →Stable |
| CounterA stock at its analyst price target can continue to appreciate if fundamentals improve faster than the consensus anticipates; the target ceiling is a snapshot, not a ceiling, and a return to earnings beats could prompt rapid target upgrades. | ||
CounterA series of misses driven by cyclical demand or input cost timing can reverse sharply as those factors normalize; if the shortfalls reflect lumpy one-time items rather than structural margin compression, the recent run may overstate the underlying deterioration.
CounterA dominant North American market share can reflect genuine competitive advantage rather than a lack of diversification; deep integration with major OEM customers may represent a switching-cost moat rather than a vulnerability.
CounterA temporary FCF-to-net-income gap can arise from elevated capital investment cycles or working capital timing; if the gap closes as capex normalizes, the apparent cash quality concern may prove transient rather than structural.
CounterA stock at its analyst price target can continue to appreciate if fundamentals improve faster than the consensus anticipates; the target ceiling is a snapshot, not a ceiling, and a return to earnings beats could prompt rapid target upgrades.
Allison Transmission's valuation appears attractive in isolation, but three consecutive earnings misses including a 34.5% shortfall in the most recent quarter, free cash flow representing only 7% of reported net income, and heavy geographic and customer concentration collectively undermine confidence in the earnings base and leave no compelling case for adding exposure at current levels where the stock has reached the analyst price target.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 7.1 |
| P/S | 8.5 |
| EV/EBITDA | 4.5 |
| Fwd P/E | 9.2 |
| PEG | 8.9 |
| Analyst target | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 10.0 |
| ROA | 5.5 |
| Gross margin | 4.5 |
| Op margin | 7.8 |
| Net margin | 7.4 |
| Current ratio | 6.5 |
| FCF quality | 0.6 |
| Moat | 6.8 |
| Piotroski F | 7.8 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 10.0 |
| EPS growth | 0.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 5.5 |
| MACD | 0.0 |
| OBV | 1.0 |
| MA position | 4.0 |
| Volume | 10.0 |
| vol acceleration | 5.5 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| LLM sentiment | 8.5 |
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
| Price target | 7.5 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 5.1 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 4.2 |
| quality rank | 9.4 |
| growth rank | 9.4 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 6.3 |
| support resistance | 6.3 |
| 52w position | 7.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 7.4 |
| days to cover | 7.5 |
| volatility | 2.7 |
| put call | 5.0 |
| implied vol | 4.9 |
| beta | 7.3 |
| debt equity | 2.7 |
| news risk | 5.5 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 3.3 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 4.5 |
| dividend safety | 5.2 |
| news activity | 6.0 |
Multiple concerning factors. Consider reducing position.
L4:PATH_F_SELLSetupRange Bound — RSI 51 mid-range, Bollinger mid-band
EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityModerate — Balanced profile
The F-path SELL output reflects an overall score of 4.3 below the 5.6 soft trigger — multiple weakening dimensions accumulated rather than a single hard-floor breach. The strongest dimension ( Value at 7.3) was not enough to lift the adjusted overall above the threshold. Co-occurring failed gates ( MOMENTUM:4.3<4.5, ASYMMETRY:0.3<1.5@spot) reinforce the read. Current asymmetry R:R is 0.35 — supplementary context, not the trigger for this path.
The strongest dimensions are Value at 7.3, Sentiment at 6.9, and Technical at 6.5; the weakest are Momentum at 4.3, Catalyst at 4.8, and Insider at 5.0. The V9 engine flagged 2 failed gates with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 0.35 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifEPS surprise exceeds 0% in 2 or more of the next 3 reported quarters, signaling a return to execution.
Trip ifNorth American revenue falls below 65% of total for 2 consecutive annual reporting periods.
Trip ifFCF as a percentage of net income rises above 50% for 2 consecutive quarters.
Trip ifConsensus analyst price target rises more than 15% above current price within 6 months, restoring positive asymmetry.