Skip to main content
ALRMAlarm.com Holdings, Inc.Sell5.9·$65.83
ALRM · Why this verdict

Why Alarm.com Holdings (ALRM) is rated SELL

Updated

Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results. How we score · Editorial policy

Show full disclosure ▾

About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.

Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.

Conflicts and positions. People who build TrendMatrix, or entities they control, may hold positions, long or short, in securities it covers, and may trade them at any time. Positions are not disclosed individually. Verdicts are generated by an automated model applied by the same rules to every covered stock, and are not adjusted for any position held by the people who build TrendMatrix. We do not accept payment from issuers for coverage.

No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security.

No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.

Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.

Methodology · Editorial policy & full disclaimer

VerdictSELL
Overall score5.9/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroRISK_OFF
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis

Engine thesis — one sentence

Alarm.com has a four-quarter beat streak, steady revenue growth and a perfect 9-of-9 Piotroski score, but the price is above the analyst target and RSI of 85 shows an overbought stock into earnings in four days.

Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.

Thesis pillars

Quarterly revenue has climbed steadily from about $254M to $278M over five quarters.

→Stable
Quality breakdown
Expectation
Quarterly revenue exceeds $290M within 12 months.

CounterGrowth of about 2 to 5% per quarter is modest and the Rule of 40 score fails at 19.

EPS beat estimates in each of the last four quarters, with surprises from 7.6% to 24.3%.

↓Deteriorating
Earnings
Expectation
EPS beats at the November 5 report.

CounterBeats against conservative estimates may not translate to stock gains at current levels.

A Piotroski F-Score of 9 of 9 and a current ratio score of 8.0 indicate strong financial health.

→Stable
Quality breakdown
Expectation
Piotroski score stays at 7 or above.

CounterReturn and margin scores are mid-range, so health may not convert into profitable growth.

The $64.86 price is above the $56.55 analyst target by about 12.8%, leaving no upside to target.

→Stable
Targets
Expectation
Analysts raise targets above the price or the price consolidates.

CounterThe stock is only 3.8% from its high with accumulating volume, and a beat could drive targets higher.

RSI of 85 marks an extremely overbought stock and insiders sold about $3.2M with no buys.

↓Deteriorating
Momentum breakdown
Expectation
RSI falls below 70 without a drop of more than 10%.

CounterInstitutions are accumulating, and selling of 0.10% of market cap is modest.

Per-dimension breakdown

Value

5.4/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
P/E4.4
P/S8.2
EV/EBITDA0.0
Fwd P/E6.0
PEG9.4
Analyst target3.0
  • ▸Forward P/E: 21.4x
  • ▸PEG: 0.59

Quality

6.3/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
ROE4.4
ROA3.3
Gross margin9.2
Op margin6.0
Net margin5.6
Current ratio8.0
FCF quality6.2
Moat7.0
Rule of 403.0
Piotroski F10.0
  • ▸Rule of 40: 19 (fail)
  • ▸Strong Piotroski F-Score: 9/9

Growth

7.0/10data confidence 67%
ComponentSub-score
Rev growth4.8
EPS growth9.2

Momentum

6.6/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
RSI3.8
MACD10.0
OBV10.0
MA position9.0
Volume0.0
  • ▸Overbought (RSI 84)
  • ▸Volume accumulation (rising OBV)
  • ▸Above 200-day MA

Sentiment

6.0/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
LLM sentiment6.5
Analyst rating6.5
Price target4.8
  • ▸Light analyst coverage (5.0) — signal dampened

Insider

5.3/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
materiality4.5
insider conviction2.0
holder change7.7
notable moves7.0
  • ▸Modest insider selling — $3,180,878 (0.098% of mkt cap)
  • ▸Institutions accumulating

Peer rank

4.2/10data confidence 80%
ComponentSub-score
value rank5.7
quality rank5.4
growth rank3.0

Technical

4.2/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
bollinger1.9
support resistance1.1
52w position9.5

Risk (lower is worse)

6.0/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
short interest5.2
days to cover3.9
volatility5.4
put call9.0
implied vol5.1
max pain risk3.0
beta8.8
debt equity7.3
  • ▸Above max pain $50

Catalyst

7.0/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
erm5.0
earnings history10.0
earnings timing5.0
surprise avg10.0
news activity5.0
  • ▸Perfect beat streak: 4Q
  • ▸Earnings in 2 days

How the verdict was assembled

Engine trigger

Multiple concerning factors. Consider reducing position.

Engine technical detail
verdict_path: L4:PATH_F_SELL
Passed (4)
  • MOMENTUM:6.6>=5.5
  • INSIDER:OK
  • SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
  • MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (2)
  • ASYMMETRY:-0.9=NEGATIVE
  • EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:2d<=7d
Warning (1)
  • 8K_CSUITE_CHANGE:5.02 (officer departure/appointment)
Reward-to-Risk
-0.94
Upside
-14.1%
Downside
15.0%
Sizing output
AVOID

Setup— — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed

EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified

SuitabilityAggressive — MCap $3.2B<$5B

Investment implication

The F-path SELL output reflects an overall score of 5.1 below the 5.6 soft trigger — multiple weakening dimensions accumulated rather than a single hard-floor breach. The strongest dimension ( Growth at 7.0) was not enough to lift the adjusted overall above the threshold. Co-occurring failed gates ( ASYMMETRY:-0.9=NEGATIVE, EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:2d<=7d) reinforce the read. Current asymmetry R:R is -0.94 — supplementary context, not the trigger for this path.

The strongest dimensions are Growth at 7.0, Catalyst at 7.0, and Momentum at 6.6; the weakest are Technical at 4.2, Peer rank at 4.2, and Insider at 5.3. The V9 engine flagged 2 failed gates with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -0.94 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.

What would invalidate the thesis

Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.

  • P1Perfect Beat Streak

    Trip ifEPS surprise falls below 0% for 2 consecutive quarters.

  • P2Steady Revenue Growth

    Trip ifQuarterly revenue growth falls below 3% YoY.

  • P3Strong Financial Health

    Trip ifPiotroski F-Score falls below 6 from current 9.

  • P4Price Above Analyst Target

    Trip ifPrice exceeds the analyst target by more than 25%.

  • P5Overbought Insider Selling

    Trip ifPrice falls more than 10% below the current $64.86 after earnings.

Engine reasoning is mechanically derived from pipeline gate outputs. See decision view.

Home › Stocks › ALRM › Why this verdict
Why TrendMatrix rates ALRM the way it does — verdict reasoning