Skip to main content
ALLEAllegion plcSell5.8·$189.35
ALLE · Why this verdict

Why Allegion (ALLE) is rated SELL

Updated

Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results. How we score · Editorial policy

Show full disclosure ▾

About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.

Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.

Conflicts and positions. People who build TrendMatrix, or entities they control, may hold positions, long or short, in securities it covers, and may trade them at any time. Positions are not disclosed individually. Verdicts are generated by an automated model applied by the same rules to every covered stock, and are not adjusted for any position held by the people who build TrendMatrix. We do not accept payment from issuers for coverage.

No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security.

No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.

Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.

Methodology · Editorial policy & full disclaimer

VerdictSELL
Overall score5.8/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroRISK_OFF
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis

Engine thesis — one sentence

Allegion is a high-quality business with 34% ROE and strong margins, but the price is above the analyst target and technically overbought, limiting near-term upside.

Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.

Thesis pillars

Return on equity of 34%, margins near 16% and a Piotroski score of 8 of 9 mark a high-quality business.

→Stable
Quality breakdown
Expectation
ROE stays above 25% over the next 12 months.

CounterReturns may be flattered by leverage rather than operating strength.

Quarterly revenue rose from about $1.03B in late 2025 to $1.17B in the September 2026 quarter.

→Stable
Earnings
Expectation
Quarterly revenue stays above $1.1B.

CounterEarnings were split with two misses and two beats, so margin pressure may offset sales growth.

The $186.44 price is above the $167.59 analyst target by about 10.1%, leaving no upside to target.

↓Deteriorating
Targets
Expectation
Price consolidates toward the target or targets rise.

CounterThe stock is 1.7% from its 52-week high with accumulating volume, so momentum may continue past the target.

Forward P/E of 18.4x with a PEG of 2.10 means the valuation is not supported by growth.

↓Deteriorating
Valuation breakdown
Expectation
Earnings growth accelerates so PEG falls below 1.5.

CounterDefensive security products may deserve a premium multiple.

RSI of 93 signals an extremely overbought stock that has run far above typical levels.

↑Improving
Momentum breakdown
Expectation
RSI normalizes below 70 without a price drop of more than 10%.

CounterStrong volume accumulation suggests buyers may keep the trend going.

Per-dimension breakdown

Value

4.9/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
P/E5.5
P/S7.8
EV/EBITDA2.1
Fwd P/E6.8
PEG4.4
Analyst target3.0
  • ▸Forward P/E: 18.9x
  • ▸PEG: 2.10

Quality

7.6/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
ROE10.0
ROA7.5
Gross margin5.0
Op margin9.7
Net margin7.9
Current ratio6.7
FCF quality6.2
Moat6.1
Piotroski F8.9
  • ▸Excellent ROE: 34%
  • ▸Strong margins: 16%
  • ▸Strong Piotroski F-Score: 8/9
  • ▸High-quality business

Growth

5.3/10data confidence 67%
ComponentSub-score
Rev growth4.9
EPS growth5.8

Momentum

7.1/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
RSI3.5
MACD10.0
OBV10.0
MA position9.0
Volume2.9
  • ▸Overbought (RSI 90)
  • ▸Volume accumulation (rising OBV)
  • ▸Above 200-day MA

Sentiment

6.2/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
LLM sentiment6.2
Analyst rating7.0
Price target5.3

Insider

5.5/10data confidence 50%
ComponentSub-score
materiality5.0
holder change5.9
  • ▸Insider selling (low materiality) — $2,165,598 (0.013% of mkt cap)

Peer rank

4.4/10data confidence 80%
ComponentSub-score
value rank3.4
quality rank7.7
growth rank4.5
  • ▸Superior ROE vs peers

Technical

3.9/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
bollinger1.5
support resistance0.6
52w position9.7

Risk (lower is worse)

6.9/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
short interest8.4
days to cover8.4
volatility6.0
put call10.0
implied vol6.1
max pain risk3.0
beta8.1
debt equity5.0
  • ▸Above max pain $125

Catalyst

5.1/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
erm6.5
earnings history3.3
earnings timing5.0
surprise avg3.1
dividend safety6.8
news activity6.0
  • ▸Earnings concerns: 2B/2M

How the verdict was assembled

Engine trigger

Multiple concerning factors. Consider reducing position.

Engine technical detail
verdict_path: L4:PATH_F_SELL
Passed (7)
  • MOMENTUM:7.1>=5.5
  • INSIDER:OK
  • 8K:CLEAN
  • NEWS_BOOST:ANALYST:0.50
  • EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:105d clear
  • SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
  • MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (1)
  • ASYMMETRY:-0.7=NEGATIVE
Warning (0)

none

Reward-to-Risk
-0.74
Upside
-11.0%
Downside
15.0%
Sizing output
AVOID

Setup— — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed

EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified

SuitabilityModerate — Balanced profile

Investment implication

The F-path SELL output reflects an overall score of 4.8 below the 5.6 soft trigger — multiple weakening dimensions accumulated rather than a single hard-floor breach. The strongest dimension ( Quality at 7.6) was not enough to lift the adjusted overall above the threshold. Co-occurring failed gates ( ASYMMETRY:-0.7=NEGATIVE) reinforce the read. Current asymmetry R:R is -0.74 — supplementary context, not the trigger for this path.

The strongest dimensions are Quality at 7.6, Momentum at 7.1, and Risk (lower is worse) at 6.9; the weakest are Technical at 3.9, Peer rank at 4.4, and Value at 4.9. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -0.74 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.

What would invalidate the thesis

Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.

  • P1High Return Quality

    Trip ifReturn on equity falls below 25% from current 34%.

  • P2Revenue Recovery

    Trip ifQuarterly revenue falls below $1.05B.

  • P3Price Above Analyst Target

    Trip ifPrice exceeds the analyst target by more than 20%.

  • P4Rich Multiple For Growth

    Trip ifForward P/E rises above 22x.

  • P5Overbought Technicals

    Trip ifPrice falls more than 10% below the current $186.44.

Engine reasoning is mechanically derived from pipeline gate outputs. See decision view.

Home › Stocks › ALLE › Why this verdict