Value
2.6/10data confidence 50%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 0.0 |
| PEG | 4.7 |
| Analyst target | 4.0 |
- ▸PEG: 1.77
- ▸Expensive valuation
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
Arteris shows elite Rule-of-40 growth economics, but a failed momentum gate, negative risk-reward asymmetry, extreme insider selling of 2.09% of market cap, and elevated implied volatility argue for caution even as the growth story remains intact.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Arteris posts an elite Rule of 40 score of 65 with 39% YoY revenue growth and positive free cash flow despite a GAAP loss. Quality breakdown | The Rule of 40 score should stay well above 40 and free cash flow should remain positive over the next 12 months for the growth thesis to hold. | →Stable |
| CounterElite growth-plus-margin combinations in semiconductor IP licensing can decelerate quickly once large customer design wins are fully monetized. | ||
Both the momentum gate at 3.6 against a 4.5 threshold and the asymmetry ratio at -0.6, negative, have failed, signaling the technical and risk-reward setup are currently unfavorable. Engine gate (failed) | Momentum should climb back above 4.5 and asymmetry should turn positive for the setup to clear the engine's gates. | →Stable |
| CounterA weak overall score of 4.9 out of 10 combined with failed gates may simply reflect a temporary post-rally pause rather than a structural deterioration. | ||
Insiders have sold roughly $33.9 million, or 2.09% of market cap, triggering the engine's extreme insider-selling gate. Insider breakdown | Insider selling as a percent of market cap should decline meaningfully from the current elevated level. | →Stable |
| CounterLarge insider sales at a semiconductor IP company can reflect routine diversification of concentrated founder or early-investor stakes rather than a negative view. | ||
The stock has already reached its prior analyst target with a leverage penalty applied given a D/E of 2.6, leaving limited near-term upside on a rich valuation. Bear case | Debt-to-equity should decline from the current 2.6 for the leverage penalty to ease. | ↓Deteriorating |
| CounterA newly issued, higher analyst target following the strong growth print could quickly restore modeled upside. | ||
An elevated put/call ratio of 1.40 and high implied volatility of 103% point to substantial priced-in uncertainty. Key risks | Implied volatility should compress from 103% if the technical and insider-selling concerns resolve favorably. | ↓Deteriorating |
| CounterHigh implied volatility ahead of a growth-stock earnings report is typical and does not necessarily indicate elevated fundamental risk. | ||
CounterElite growth-plus-margin combinations in semiconductor IP licensing can decelerate quickly once large customer design wins are fully monetized.
CounterA weak overall score of 4.9 out of 10 combined with failed gates may simply reflect a temporary post-rally pause rather than a structural deterioration.
CounterLarge insider sales at a semiconductor IP company can reflect routine diversification of concentrated founder or early-investor stakes rather than a negative view.
CounterA newly issued, higher analyst target following the strong growth print could quickly restore modeled upside.
CounterHigh implied volatility ahead of a growth-stock earnings report is typical and does not necessarily indicate elevated fundamental risk.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 0.0 |
| PEG | 4.7 |
| Analyst target | 4.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROA | 0.0 |
| Gross margin | 10.0 |
| Op margin | 0.0 |
| Net margin | 0.0 |
| Current ratio | 2.9 |
| FCF quality | 8.3 |
| Moat | 6.5 |
| Rule of 40 | 9.5 |
| Piotroski F | 4.4 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 10.0 |
| EPS growth | 10.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 8.3 |
| MACD | 0.0 |
| OBV | 10.0 |
| MA position | 4.0 |
| Volume | 0.2 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 7.3 |
| Price target | 7.0 |
| erm sentiment | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 2.0 |
| insider conviction | 2.0 |
| holder change | 10.0 |
| notable moves | 7.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 2.6 |
| quality rank | 0.4 |
| growth rank | 7.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 6.4 |
| support resistance | 7.8 |
| 52w position | 3.3 |
| gap | 7.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 6.0 |
| days to cover | 8.3 |
| volatility | 0.0 |
| put call | 10.0 |
| implied vol | 0.0 |
| max pain risk | 3.0 |
| beta | 3.6 |
| debt equity | 2.4 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 10.0 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 4.8 |
Multiple concerning factors. Consider reducing position.
L4:PATH_F_SELLSetup— — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed
EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityAggressive — Beta 1.92>1.3, MCap $1.5B<$5B
The F-path SELL output reflects an overall score of 3.8 below the 5.6 soft trigger — multiple weakening dimensions accumulated rather than a single hard-floor breach. The strongest dimension ( Growth at 10.0) was not enough to lift the adjusted overall above the threshold. Co-occurring failed gates ( ASYMMETRY:-0.1=NEGATIVE, INSIDER:4.70%=EXTREME) reinforce the read. Current asymmetry R:R is -0.06 — supplementary context, not the trigger for this path.
The strongest dimensions are Growth at 10.0, Sentiment at 6.6, and Catalyst at 6.2; the weakest are Peer rank at 2.5, Value at 2.6, and Risk (lower is worse) at 4.2. The V9 engine flagged 2 failed gates with 3 warnings, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -0.06 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifRule of 40 score falls below 40 from the current 65.
Trip ifMomentum score rises above 4.5 from the current 3.6.
Trip ifInsider selling as a percent of market cap falls below 1.0% from the current 2.09%.
Trip ifDebt-to-equity ratio falls below 1.5 from the current 2.6.
Trip ifImplied volatility falls below 60% from the current 103%.