Skip to main content
AINAlbany International CorporatioSell6.1·$72.02
AIN · Why this verdict

Why Albany International Corporatio (AIN) is rated SELL

Updated

Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results. How we score · Editorial policy

Show full disclosure ▾

About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.

Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.

Conflicts and positions. People who build TrendMatrix, or entities they control, may hold positions, long or short, in securities it covers, and may trade them at any time. Positions are not disclosed individually. Verdicts are generated by an automated model applied by the same rules to every covered stock, and are not adjusted for any position held by the people who build TrendMatrix. We do not accept payment from issuers for coverage.

No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security.

No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.

Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.

Methodology · Editorial policy & full disclaimer

VerdictSELL
Overall score6.1/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroRISK_OFF
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis

Engine thesis — one sentence

Albany International shows strong revenue growth (34% YoY) and a mostly positive earnings record, but the stock is above the analyst target and heavily concentrated in paper machine clothing and a single aerospace program supplier.

Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.

Thesis pillars

Revenue grew 34% YoY, with the September 2026 quarter at $349.5M versus $261.4M a year earlier.

↓Deteriorating
Growth breakdown
Expectation
Quarterly revenue holds above $330M, in line with the $333.7M next-quarter estimate.

CounterGrowth comparisons are flattered by a weak September 2025 quarter; revenue in mid-2024 was already $332M, so the recovery may just be a return to prior levels.

The last 3 of 4 quarters beat EPS estimates, including a 13.5% beat on 1.68 vs 1.48 in October 2026.

↑Improving
Avg surprise pct
Expectation
EPS surprise stays positive in the February 2027 report.

CounterFive of the prior eight quarters included misses, so the recent streak may be a short upswing rather than a durable pattern.

With upside of -14.2%, the $67.00 price sits above the $57.52 analyst target, leaving little valuation cushion.

↑Improving
Estimated upside
Expectation
Analyst targets rise toward the price, or the stock pulls back toward the $63.10 stop level.

CounterMomentum is strong at 8.2/10 with rising volume, and analysts may be slow to raise targets after beats.

About 80.0% of revenue comes from paper machine clothing products and a key supplier provides carbon fiber for the LEAP program, creating concentration risk.

↑Improving
Bear case
Expectation
Non-paper-machine-clothing revenue grows as a share of the total over 12 months.

CounterPaper machine clothing is a steady consumable business that supports the dividend, and supplier concentration may reflect a strong program position.

The put/call ratio of 1.60 and implied volatility of 134% show options traders hedging a possible drop after a strong run with RSI at 74.

↓Deteriorating
Options positioning
Expectation
Put/call ratio falls below 1.0 as the RSI cools from overbought levels.

CounterHigh put volume may reflect hedging by holders protecting gains rather than bearish bets.

Per-dimension breakdown

Value

6.4/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
P/E5.2
P/S9.2
EV/EBITDA6.0
Fwd P/E5.5
PEG10.0
Analyst target3.0
  • ▸Forward P/E: 23.3x
  • ▸PEG: 0.06

Quality

5.7/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
ROE3.9
ROA4.0
Gross margin2.8
Op margin7.5
Net margin3.4
Current ratio8.2
FCF quality6.1
Moat5.6
Piotroski F10.0
  • ▸Strong Piotroski F-Score: 9/9

Growth

6.4/10data confidence 67%
ComponentSub-score
Rev growth10.0
EPS growth2.8
  • ▸Strong growth: 34% YoY

Momentum

7.5/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
RSI4.1
MACD10.0
OBV10.0
MA position9.0
Volume4.2
  • ▸Overbought (RSI 77)
  • ▸Volume accumulation (rising OBV)
  • ▸Above 200-day MA

Sentiment

5.1/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
LLM sentiment5.8
Analyst rating5.0
Price target4.4

Insider

6.2/10data confidence 75%
ComponentSub-score
materiality5.0
holder change6.6
notable moves7.0
  • ▸No net insider activity — $0 (0.000% of mkt cap)

Peer rank

6.3/10data confidence 80%
ComponentSub-score
value rank3.6
quality rank5.2
growth rank9.2
  • ▸Industry growth leader

Technical

4.1/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
bollinger0.4
support resistance2.2
52w position8.8
gap5.0

Risk (lower is worse)

5.9/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
short interest7.8
days to cover6.8
volatility3.1
put call10.0
implied vol0.0
beta6.3
debt equity7.8
news risk5.5
  • ▸High IV: 88%
  • ▸Concentration risks: 2 HIGH, 1 MED (10-K Item 1A — sized via position_sizing, validated via buy_confidence)

Catalyst

6.3/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
erm5.0
earnings history6.7
earnings timing5.0
surprise avg6.4
dividend safety8.5
news activity6.0
  • ▸Strong earnings: 3B/1M
  • ▸Dividend aristocrat: 1.5% yield

How the verdict was assembled

Engine trigger

Multiple concerning factors. Consider reducing position.

Engine technical detail
verdict_path: L4:PATH_F_SELL
Passed (6)
  • MOMENTUM:7.5>=5.5
  • INSIDER:OK
  • 8K:CLEAN
  • EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:111d clear
  • SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
  • MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (1)
  • ASYMMETRY:-1.2=NEGATIVE
Warning (0)

none

Reward-to-Risk
-1.24
Upside
-18.6%
Downside
15.0%
Sizing output
AVOID

Setup— — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed

EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified

SuitabilityAggressive — MCap $2.1B<$5B

Investment implication

The F-path SELL output reflects an overall score of 4.6 below the 5.6 soft trigger — multiple weakening dimensions accumulated rather than a single hard-floor breach. The strongest dimension ( Momentum at 7.5) was not enough to lift the adjusted overall above the threshold. Co-occurring failed gates ( ASYMMETRY:-1.2=NEGATIVE) reinforce the read. Current asymmetry R:R is -1.24 — supplementary context, not the trigger for this path.

The strongest dimensions are Momentum at 7.5, Value at 6.4, and Growth at 6.4; the weakest are Technical at 4.1, Sentiment at 5.1, and Quality at 5.7. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -1.24 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.

What would invalidate the thesis

Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.

  • P1Strong Revenue Growth

    Trip ifQuarterly revenue falls below $300M for 2 consecutive quarters.

  • P2Recent Earnings Beat Momentum

    Trip ifEPS surprise stays below 0% for 2 consecutive quarters.

  • P3Price Above Analyst Target

    Trip ifShare price rises above $75 while the analyst target stays below $60, a gap of more than 25%.

  • P4Customer Supplier Concentration

    Trip ifPaper machine clothing share of revenue exceeds 85% from current 80%.

  • P5Elevated Options Risk Signals

    Trip ifPut/call ratio stays above 2.0 for 4 consecutive weeks.

Engine reasoning is mechanically derived from pipeline gate outputs. See decision view.

Home › Stocks › AIN › Why this verdict