Value
8.3/10data confidence 83%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 9.7 |
| EV/EBITDA | 4.8 |
| Fwd P/E | 9.6 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 7.5 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 7.7x
- ▸PEG: 0.14
- ▸Attractively valued
AGRO · Why this verdict
Why Adecoagro (AGRO) is rated SELL
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Show full disclosure ▾Hide full disclosure ▴
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
VerdictSELL
Overall score5.8/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
Thesis pillars
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Business quality metrics fall below the minimum acceptable floor at 2.3 out of 10, flagging concerns across return on equity, gross margin, and operating margin that undermine confidence in the sustainability of the growth profile. Warnings | Overall quality scoring improves above the 4.0 floor level over the next 4 quarters, signaling that the margin and return-on-capital profile has durably improved. | →Stable |
| CounterA strong Piotroski F-Score of 7 out of 9 signals improving balance sheet health, which can be an early indicator of quality recovery before headline margin metrics visibly turn; if the balance sheet improvement persists, quality may clear the floor within 2-3 reporting periods. | ||
Free cash flow is negative, with the ratio of free cash flow to net income at -526%, meaning the business is consuming cash rather than generating it — a material disconnect between reported profits and cash reality. Quality breakdown | Free cash flow turns positive and the free-cash-flow-to-net-income ratio rises above 30% for 2 consecutive fiscal years, indicating the business is converting its stated earnings into actual cash. | →Stable |
| CounterA deeply negative free cash flow figure in a capital-intensive business can reflect a cyclical investment period rather than a permanent structural cash drain; if the capital deployment cycle normalizes, conversion could recover quickly without requiring fundamental improvement. | ||
Revenue is growing at 22% year-over-year, indicating top-line expansion at a meaningful pace that has been accompanied by strong earnings growth. Growth breakdown | Revenue growth remains above 15% year-over-year for the next 2 consecutive quarters, confirming the expansion trajectory is durable. | →Stable |
| CounterStrong headline growth in farm products businesses can be driven by price cycles rather than volume or structural market-share gains, making the growth rate vulnerable to a commodity price reversal rather than indicating compounding competitive strength. | ||
A forward price-to-earnings ratio of 8.7x and a PEG ratio of 0.16 indicate the market is ascribing minimal growth credit to the company, positioning the stock as attractively valued relative to its stated earnings and growth trajectory. Valuation breakdown | The forward P/E multiple remains below 12x over the next 12 months, preserving the valuation discount without a multiple compression event. | →Stable |
| CounterA low PEG ratio is only meaningful if growth materializes consistently; with two earnings misses in the four most recent quarters, the growth rate underpinning the valuation may be overstated or irregular. | ||
Business quality metrics fall below the minimum acceptable floor at 2.3 out of 10, flagging concerns across return on equity, gross margin, and operating margin that undermine confidence in the sustainability of the growth profile.
→StableWarnings
- Expectation
- Overall quality scoring improves above the 4.0 floor level over the next 4 quarters, signaling that the margin and return-on-capital profile has durably improved.
CounterA strong Piotroski F-Score of 7 out of 9 signals improving balance sheet health, which can be an early indicator of quality recovery before headline margin metrics visibly turn; if the balance sheet improvement persists, quality may clear the floor within 2-3 reporting periods.
Free cash flow is negative, with the ratio of free cash flow to net income at -526%, meaning the business is consuming cash rather than generating it — a material disconnect between reported profits and cash reality.
→StableQuality breakdown
- Expectation
- Free cash flow turns positive and the free-cash-flow-to-net-income ratio rises above 30% for 2 consecutive fiscal years, indicating the business is converting its stated earnings into actual cash.
CounterA deeply negative free cash flow figure in a capital-intensive business can reflect a cyclical investment period rather than a permanent structural cash drain; if the capital deployment cycle normalizes, conversion could recover quickly without requiring fundamental improvement.
Revenue is growing at 22% year-over-year, indicating top-line expansion at a meaningful pace that has been accompanied by strong earnings growth.
→StableGrowth breakdown
- Expectation
- Revenue growth remains above 15% year-over-year for the next 2 consecutive quarters, confirming the expansion trajectory is durable.
CounterStrong headline growth in farm products businesses can be driven by price cycles rather than volume or structural market-share gains, making the growth rate vulnerable to a commodity price reversal rather than indicating compounding competitive strength.
A forward price-to-earnings ratio of 8.7x and a PEG ratio of 0.16 indicate the market is ascribing minimal growth credit to the company, positioning the stock as attractively valued relative to its stated earnings and growth trajectory.
→StableValuation breakdown
- Expectation
- The forward P/E multiple remains below 12x over the next 12 months, preserving the valuation discount without a multiple compression event.
CounterA low PEG ratio is only meaningful if growth materializes consistently; with two earnings misses in the four most recent quarters, the growth rate underpinning the valuation may be overstated or irregular.
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis
Engine thesis — one sentence
The company posts strong revenue growth of 22% and screens attractively valued on forward earnings and PEG metrics, but deeply negative free cash flow and business quality metrics well below the minimum acceptable threshold make the setup uninvestable despite the favorable reward-to-risk geometry.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
Per-dimension breakdown
Quality
2.3/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 0.4 |
| ROA | 0.7 |
| Gross margin | 0.2 |
| Op margin | 0.1 |
| Net margin | 0.5 |
| Current ratio | 6.2 |
| FCF quality | 0.0 |
| Moat | 4.9 |
| Piotroski F | 7.8 |
- ▸Earnings quality RED FLAG: -526% FCF/NI
- ▸No competitive moat
- ▸Strong Piotroski F-Score: 7/9
- ▸Quality concerns
Growth
9.1/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 8.1 |
| EPS growth | 10.0 |
- ▸Strong growth: 22% YoY
Momentum
4.5/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 3.0 |
| MACD | 7.0 |
| OBV | 10.0 |
| MA position | 2.2 |
| Volume | 0.1 |
- ▸Capitulation risk (RSI 24, below 200MA)
- ▸Volume accumulation (rising OBV)
- ▸Below 200-MA but MA still rising (+4.3%/30d) — pullback in uptrend, not confirmed weakness
Sentiment
6.4/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
| Price target | 9.2 |
| erm sentiment | 5.0 |
- ▸Analyst upside: 42%
Insider
5.5/10data confidence 50%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 5.9 |
- ▸Insider selling (low materiality) — $105,983 (0.008% of mkt cap)
Peer rank
3.8/10data confidence 80%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 0.6 |
| quality rank | 1.9 |
| growth rank | 7.5 |
Technical
5.4/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 6.5 |
| support resistance | 7.9 |
| 52w position | 2.2 |
| gap | 5.0 |
Risk (lower is worse)
5.6/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 8.2 |
| days to cover | 9.5 |
| volatility | 0.7 |
| put call | 10.0 |
| implied vol | 0.8 |
| debt equity | 4.7 |
- ▸High IV: 75%
Catalyst
5.8/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 6.5 |
| earnings history | 3.3 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 10.0 |
| dividend safety | 4.2 |
- ▸Earnings concerns: 2B/2M
- ▸Yield trap warning: high yield but unsafe
How the verdict was assembled
Engine trigger
Quality below minimum threshold.
Engine technical detail
verdict_path:
L1:HARD_BLOCKPassed (7)
- ASYMMETRY:2.5>=1.5
- INSIDER:OK
- 8K:CLEAN
- NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
- EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:39d clear
- SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
- MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (1)
- MOMENTUM:4.5<4.5
Warning (0)
none
Reward-to-Risk
2.46
Upside
+23.2%
Downside
9.4%
Sizing output
AVOID
Setup— — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed
EdgeInst Constrain — Small cap ($1.4B) below institutional reach
SuitabilityAggressive — MCap $1.4B<$5B
Investment implication
The L1 gate blocked the positive-verdict path: a hard-floor threshold was breached, so dimensional pillars — including Growth at 9.1 could not lift the engine output above the verdict floor. Failed gate signal: MOMENTUM:4.5<4.5.
The strongest dimensions are Growth at 9.1, Value at 8.3, and Sentiment at 6.4; the weakest are Quality at 2.3, Peer rank at 3.8, and Momentum at 4.5. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 2.46 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
What would invalidate the thesis
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
- P1Strong Revenue Growth
Trip ifRevenue growth falls below 10% year-over-year for 2 consecutive quarters.
- P2Attractive Value Metrics
Trip ifForward P/E expands above 14x without a commensurate upward revision in earnings estimates.
- P3Negative Free Cash Flow
Trip ifFree cash flow turns positive and the free-cash-flow-to-net-income ratio rises above 30% for 2 consecutive fiscal years.
- P4Quality Below Minimum Floor
Trip ifOverall quality score rises above 4.0 for 2 consecutive quarterly assessments.