Skip to main content
AGM-AFederal Agricultural Mortgage CHold6.1·$125.03
AGM-A · Why this verdict

Why Federal Agricultural Mortgage C (AGM-A) is rated HOLD

Updated

Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results. How we score · Editorial policy

Show full disclosure ▾

About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.

Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.

Conflicts and positions. People who build TrendMatrix, or entities they control, may hold positions, long or short, in securities it covers, and may trade them at any time. Positions are not disclosed individually. Verdicts are generated by an automated model applied by the same rules to every covered stock, and are not adjusted for any position held by the people who build TrendMatrix. We do not accept payment from issuers for coverage.

No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security.

No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.

Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.

Methodology · Editorial policy & full disclaimer

VerdictHOLD
Overall score6.1/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroRISK_OFF
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis

Engine thesis — one sentence

Federal Agricultural Mortgage earns very high margins of 56% and looks cheaply valued, but heavy customer and counterparty concentration, leverage, and a capitulation-style selloff keep the stock from being compelling to add.

Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.

Thesis pillars

The company earns strong margins of 56% and a Piotroski F-Score of 8/9, which marks a high-quality credit business.

→Stable
Quality breakdown
Expectation
Margins stay above 45% and the F-Score stays at 7 or higher over 12 months.

CounterReturn on assets scores only 0.4/10 and margins on a leveraged lender can be flattered by accounting, so the quality may be thinner than it looks.

The stock is attractively valued, with a PEG of 0.42 and valuation score of 9.6/10.

→Stable
Valuation breakdown
Expectation
The PEG stays below 1.0 as earnings keep growing.

CounterCheap earnings multiples on a leveraged lender often reflect credit and funding risk that the market is pricing in.

Exposure is concentrated: the top-3 AgVantage issuers make up 90.6% of the counterparty base and the top-10 agricultural finance institutions make up 55.0% of customers.

↑Improving
Bear case
Expectation
Concentration stays stable or falls, with no loss of a top-3 issuer.

CounterThese counterparties are large, regulated agricultural lenders and the loans are secured, so concentration may carry less loss risk than the percentages imply.

The stock is in a capitulation-style selloff, with RSI of 17, below its 200-day average on 7.9x average volume, though the long-term average is still rising.

↓Deteriorating
Momentum breakdown
Expectation
RSI recovers above 40 and price reclaims the 200-day average within 12 months.

CounterVolume distribution with falling OBV and a MACD score of 0 suggest sellers remain in control and the oversold bounce may fail.

Leverage is heavy, with a debt-to-equity of 20.5 that costs 1.5 points in the score, while the 5.0% dividend yield rates as safe.

↑Improving
Bear case
Expectation
Dividend is maintained and debt-to-equity does not rise above 22.

CounterA 5.0% yield on a stock under selling pressure can signal the market doubts dividend durability at this leverage.

Per-dimension breakdown

Value

9.6/10data confidence 50%
ComponentSub-score
P/E9.7
P/S8.1
PEG10.0
  • ▸PEG: 0.42
  • ▸Attractively valued

Quality

7.0/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
ROE4.5
ROA0.4
Gross margin10.0
Op margin10.0
Net margin10.0
Current ratio5.5
Moat6.9
Piotroski F8.9
  • ▸Strong margins: 56%
  • ▸Strong Piotroski F-Score: 8/9

Growth

5.9/10data confidence 67%
ComponentSub-score
Rev growth7.1
EPS growth4.7

Momentum

1.6/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
RSI3.0
MACD0.0
OBV1.0
MA position2.2
  • ▸Capitulation risk (RSI 17, below 200MA)
  • ▸Volume distribution (falling OBV)
  • ▸Below 200-MA but MA still rising (+1.3%/30d) — pullback in uptrend, not confirmed weakness

Sentiment

5.0/10data confidence 67%
ComponentSub-score
Analyst rating5.0
erm sentiment5.0

Insider

5.0/10data confidence 50%

Peer rank

4.7/10data confidence 80%
ComponentSub-score
value rank5.5
quality rank6.1
growth rank7.0
  • ▸Attractive P/E vs peers
  • ▸Best-in-class margins

Technical

8.1/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
bollinger10.0
support resistance10.0
52w position4.4

Risk (lower is worse)

7.1/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
short interest10.0
days to cover10.0
volatility8.4
beta6.9
debt equity0.0
  • ▸Concentration risks: 3 HIGH (10-K Item 1A — sized via position_sizing, validated via buy_confidence)

Catalyst

7.0/10data confidence 50%
ComponentSub-score
erm5.0
dividend safety9.0
  • ▸Dividend: 5.0%

How the verdict was assembled

Engine trigger

Maintain position. Not compelling to add more.

Engine technical detail
verdict_path: L4:PATH_F_HOLD
Passed (5)
  • INSIDER:OK
  • NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
  • EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:NO_DATE
  • SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
  • MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (1)
  • MOMENTUM:1.6<4.5
Warning (2)
  • ASYMMETRY:UPSIDE_EXHAUSTED (upside=0.0%)
  • 8K_CSUITE_CHANGE:5.02 (officer departure/appointment)
Reward-to-Risk
0.00
Upside
+11.3%
Downside
5.0%
Sizing output
AVOID

Setup— — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed

EdgeInst Constrain — Small cap ($1.4B) below institutional reach

SuitabilityAggressive — MCap $1.4B<$5B

Investment implication

None of the engine's positive-conviction paths (C-quality, D-momentum) triggered — the F-path HOLD reflects balanced signals. Strongest-cleared gate: INSIDER:OK. Top dim: Value at 9.6; weakest: Momentum at 1.6. No conviction either direction.

The strongest dimensions are Value at 9.6, Technical at 8.1, and Risk (lower is worse) at 7.1; the weakest are Momentum at 1.6, Peer rank at 4.7, and Insider at 5.0. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate with 2 warnings, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 0.00 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.

What would invalidate the thesis

Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.

  • P1High Margin Quality Lender

    Trip ifMargins fall below 40% from the current 56%.

  • P2Attractive Valuation Peg

    Trip ifPEG rises above 1.5 from the current 0.42.

  • P3Counterparty Concentration Risk

    Trip ifTop-3 AgVantage issuer share crosses 95% from the current 90.6%.

  • P4Oversold Capitulation Selloff

    Trip ifRSI drops to below 10 from the current 17 without a rebound above the 200-day average.

  • P5Leverage Penalty Dividend

    Trip ifDebt-to-equity exceeds 25 from the current 20.5.

Engine reasoning is mechanically derived from pipeline gate outputs. See decision view.

Home › Stocks › AGM-A › Why this verdict