top-5 customers
“10-K Item 1A: 'For the year ended December 31, 2025, five customers represented 55.7% of aggregate revenue.'”
Updated
The most significant concentration Adeia discloses is top-5 customers at 55.7%, classified HIGH by disclosed size. Below: the full set from the latest 10-K — verbatim quotes, filing references, and a synthesis of what these exposures mean together.
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
Source: Adeia’s SEC Form 10-K filed — view the filing on SEC EDGAR ↗
Each card carries a disclosed-size chip (HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW — how large the exposure is as a share of revenue, not how dangerous it is) and a nature tag: Built-in(the company’s own model, geography, or products) or Outside party (an external customer, supplier, or distributor it relies on).
“10-K Item 1A: 'For the year ended December 31, 2025, five customers represented 55.7% of aggregate revenue.'”
Adeia's concentration profile is defined by a single customer-side disclosure: five customers represented 55.7% of aggregate revenue for the year ended December 31, 2025. By disclosed size this is a large share — more than half of total revenue generated by only five relationships — and the character of the exposure is one of dependency, since the company's licensing business is levered to the continuation and renewal of a small number of contracts with key licensees. The filing does not name the five customers or break out individual shares, so it is not possible to assess how the 55.7% aggregate is distributed within the group, whether it is dominated by one or two names or spread relatively evenly across the five. That opacity limits the ability to assess whether the risk is more of a single-name dependency or a portfolio of moderate individual exposures. There are no disclosed geographic, product, or supplier concentrations in the prompt. The profile is therefore entirely customer-driven — a licensing business where more than half of total revenue depends on a small set of counterparties renewing or maintaining agreements on terms favorable to Adeia. The mechanism through which this could affect results is contract non-renewal, renegotiation at lower royalty rates, or litigation by licensees challenging the validity or applicability of the underlying intellectual property. Because the company generates revenue through recurring license fees rather than per-unit product sales, changes in contract terms with even one or two of the five key customers could have a disproportionate effect on the reported total, making license renewal timelines and litigation outcomes the primary variables to watch.
For the engine’s reasoning on ADEA’s current verdict — including which dimensions drove the score — see the per-dimension breakdown.
| Symbol | Name | HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALKT | Alkami Technology, Inc. | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| ADSK | Autodesk, Inc. | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| ADEA● | Adeia Inc. | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| AGYS | Agilysys, Inc. | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| ADBE | Adobe Inc. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| ADP | Automatic Data Processing, Inc. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Concentration counts reflect items disclosed in each peer’s most recent 10-K; disclosed-size classification uses TrendMatrix’s internal 10-K extraction taxonomy.