wind tower customers
“10-K Item 1A: 'Arcosa's wind tower customer base is highly concentrated due to a limited number of companies constructing wind towers'”
Updated
The most significant concentration Arcosa discloses is wind tower customers, classified HIGH by disclosed size. Below: the full set from the latest 10-K — verbatim quotes, filing references, and a synthesis of what these exposures mean together.
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results. How we score · Editorial policy
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. People who build TrendMatrix, or entities they control, may hold positions, long or short, in securities it covers, and may trade them at any time. Positions are not disclosed individually. Verdicts are generated by an automated model applied by the same rules to every covered stock, and are not adjusted for any position held by the people who build TrendMatrix. We do not accept payment from issuers for coverage.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
Source: Arcosa’s SEC Form 10-K filed — view the filing on SEC EDGAR ↗
Each card carries a disclosed-size chip (HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW — how large the exposure is as a share of revenue, not how dangerous it is) and a nature tag: Built-in(the company’s own model, geography, or products) or Outside party (an external customer, supplier, or distributor it relies on).
“10-K Item 1A: 'Arcosa's wind tower customer base is highly concentrated due to a limited number of companies constructing wind towers'”
“10-K Item 1: 'Our largest markets are Texas and New Jersey, which represent approximately 35% and 20% of 2025 segment revenues'”
“10-K Item 1A: 'GE Vernova accounted for approximately 12.2% of our consolidated revenues in 2025'”
Arcosa's concentrations cluster in three places. The wind tower customer base is highly concentrated, reflecting the small number of companies that construct wind towers — a high-share customer dependency by disclosed size, and the one most exposed to a single program or order shift. Geographically, the two largest markets are Texas and New Jersey, which represent approximately 35% and 20% of segment revenues respectively — a medium-share, structural tilt that tracks where infrastructure demand sits. Separately, GE Vernova accounted for approximately 12.2% of consolidated revenues, a low-share customer dependency. Netting these out, the wind tower customer concentration is the dominant feature: it is the highest-share exposure and the most idiosyncratic, since it rests on a handful of buyers. The Texas and New Jersey geographic weighting and the single GE Vernova relationship are secondary, adding regional and customer sensitivity without matching the wind tower line's structural reliance.
For the engine’s reasoning on ACA’s current verdict — including which dimensions drove the score — see the per-dimension breakdown.
| Symbol | Name | HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACA● | Arcosa, Inc. | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| AGX | Argan, Inc. | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 |
| ACM | AECOM | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| BLD | TopBuild Corp. | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| CDNL | Cardinal Infrastructure Group I | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| APG | APi Group Corporation | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Concentration counts reflect items disclosed in each peer’s most recent 10-K; disclosed-size classification uses TrendMatrix’s internal 10-K extraction taxonomy.