Value
5.3/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 2.4 |
| P/S | 8.5 |
| EV/EBITDA | 2.7 |
| Fwd P/E | 6.7 |
| PEG | 6.6 |
| Analyst target | 4.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 19.2x
- ▸PEG: 1.10
VVV · Why this verdict
Why Valvoline (VVV) is rated SELL
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Show full disclosure ▾Hide full disclosure ▴
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
VerdictSELL
Overall score5.7/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis
Engine thesis — one sentence
Valvoline is an automotive quick-lube service company with 25% revenue growth, 32% return on equity, and a recovery technical pattern with improving MACD, but the stock has already reached its analyst price target with essentially zero upside remaining, a risk score below the minimum threshold at 2.7, and 14% short interest combined with a 4.60 put/call ratio signaling intense bearish conviction.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
Thesis pillars
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Valvoline generates 25% revenue growth with a 32% return on equity — placing it as both an industry growth leader and a superior ROE performer versus peers — while the PEG ratio of 1.06 suggests the growth premium is fairly valued rather than overpriced. Peer-rank breakdown | Revenue growth should remain above 15% annually over the next 12 months, and ROE should stay above 25%, confirming the company's reinvestment model is creating value at an above-cost-of-capital rate. | →Stable |
| Counter32% ROE in an auto services business is achieved through high financial leverage rather than superior operating economics; if debt costs rise or service volumes decline with increased electric vehicle penetration, the ROE will compress rapidly. | ||
The stock has reached its analyst price target with essentially zero upside remaining (-0.4%), while simultaneously carrying a put/call ratio of 4.60 — one of the highest in the portfolio — and 14% short interest, indicating options market participants and short sellers share strong conviction that the stock is overvalued at current levels. Key risks | The put/call ratio should decline below 2.0 within 6 months as the fundamental growth story either justifies current prices (causing shorts to cover) or the stock corrects to a more favorable entry level. | →Stable |
| CounterHigh put/call ratios in momentum stocks at technical peaks have historically been contrarian signals; if the fundamental growth story continues to deliver, short sellers and put buyers will be forced to cover, driving the stock higher despite the current extreme positioning. | ||
The stock is in a recovery pattern with improving MACD and RSI at 75 — but an RSI of 75 is technically overbought, the Bollinger band score is 0.4/10 (near the upper band), and OBV is falling, creating a divergence between the improving trend headline and the deteriorating breadth of the move. Momentum breakdown | RSI should normalize below 65 within 30 days through either a consolidation period or a controlled pullback, without crossing below 50 — which would signal the momentum recovery has failed. | →Stable |
| CounterRSI levels above 70 in strong uptrend stocks can persist for extended periods; in a momentum continuation with improving MACD, the overbought reading may simply reflect genuine institutional demand rather than an unsustainable condition. | ||
The risk score of 2.7 is below the 3.0 minimum threshold, driven by 14% short interest, 4.60 put/call ratio, and implied volatility of 88%, creating a risk profile that exceeds the system's tolerance even for an otherwise strong growth story. Scores | The risk score should recover above 3.0 within 12 months as short interest declines below 10% and the put/call ratio normalizes toward 1.5, removing the risk threshold breach that currently prevents a buy recommendation. | →Stable |
| CounterA risk score of 2.7 versus a 3.0 threshold is a marginal breach, and a stock with 25% revenue growth and 32% ROE that is otherwise well-positioned may deserve a higher risk tolerance than the system applies. | ||
Valvoline generates 25% revenue growth with a 32% return on equity — placing it as both an industry growth leader and a superior ROE performer versus peers — while the PEG ratio of 1.06 suggests the growth premium is fairly valued rather than overpriced.
→StablePeer-rank breakdown
- Expectation
- Revenue growth should remain above 15% annually over the next 12 months, and ROE should stay above 25%, confirming the company's reinvestment model is creating value at an above-cost-of-capital rate.
Counter32% ROE in an auto services business is achieved through high financial leverage rather than superior operating economics; if debt costs rise or service volumes decline with increased electric vehicle penetration, the ROE will compress rapidly.
The stock has reached its analyst price target with essentially zero upside remaining (-0.4%), while simultaneously carrying a put/call ratio of 4.60 — one of the highest in the portfolio — and 14% short interest, indicating options market participants and short sellers share strong conviction that the stock is overvalued at current levels.
→StableKey risks
- Expectation
- The put/call ratio should decline below 2.0 within 6 months as the fundamental growth story either justifies current prices (causing shorts to cover) or the stock corrects to a more favorable entry level.
CounterHigh put/call ratios in momentum stocks at technical peaks have historically been contrarian signals; if the fundamental growth story continues to deliver, short sellers and put buyers will be forced to cover, driving the stock higher despite the current extreme positioning.
The stock is in a recovery pattern with improving MACD and RSI at 75 — but an RSI of 75 is technically overbought, the Bollinger band score is 0.4/10 (near the upper band), and OBV is falling, creating a divergence between the improving trend headline and the deteriorating breadth of the move.
→StableMomentum breakdown
- Expectation
- RSI should normalize below 65 within 30 days through either a consolidation period or a controlled pullback, without crossing below 50 — which would signal the momentum recovery has failed.
CounterRSI levels above 70 in strong uptrend stocks can persist for extended periods; in a momentum continuation with improving MACD, the overbought reading may simply reflect genuine institutional demand rather than an unsustainable condition.
The risk score of 2.7 is below the 3.0 minimum threshold, driven by 14% short interest, 4.60 put/call ratio, and implied volatility of 88%, creating a risk profile that exceeds the system's tolerance even for an otherwise strong growth story.
→StableScores
- Expectation
- The risk score should recover above 3.0 within 12 months as short interest declines below 10% and the put/call ratio normalizes toward 1.5, removing the risk threshold breach that currently prevents a buy recommendation.
CounterA risk score of 2.7 versus a 3.0 threshold is a marginal breach, and a stock with 25% revenue growth and 32% ROE that is otherwise well-positioned may deserve a higher risk tolerance than the system applies.
Per-dimension breakdown
Quality
5.5/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 10.0 |
| ROA | 4.5 |
| Gross margin | 3.7 |
| Op margin | 7.2 |
| Net margin | 2.5 |
| Current ratio | 2.9 |
| FCF quality | 4.0 |
| Moat | 6.8 |
| Piotroski F | 7.8 |
- ▸Excellent ROE: 32%
- ▸Earnings quality warning: 51% FCF/NI
- ▸Strong Piotroski F-Score: 7/9
Growth
7.1/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 8.7 |
| EPS growth | 5.5 |
- ▸Strong growth: 25% YoY
Momentum
6.3/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 4.2 |
| MACD | 10.0 |
| OBV | 10.0 |
| MA position | 7.5 |
| Volume | 0.0 |
- ▸Overbought (RSI 76)
- ▸Volume accumulation (rising OBV)
- ▸Above 200-MA but MA slope flat/negative + RSI 76 (late-cycle distribution risk)
Sentiment
6.2/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 7.3 |
| Price target | 5.9 |
| erm sentiment | 5.0 |
Insider
5.3/10data confidence 50%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.5 |
| holder change | 5.1 |
- ▸Insider buying (low materiality) — $450,877 (0.009% of mkt cap)
Peer rank
5.3/10data confidence 80%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 1.0 |
| quality rank | 7.2 |
| growth rank | 8.1 |
- ▸Superior ROE vs peers
- ▸Industry growth leader
Technical
3.5/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 0.8 |
| support resistance | 0.5 |
| 52w position | 9.3 |
Risk (lower is worse)
4.2/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 3.0 |
| days to cover | 4.0 |
| volatility | 5.2 |
| put call | 7.8 |
| implied vol | 4.0 |
| max pain risk | 3.0 |
| beta | 6.9 |
| debt equity | 0.0 |
- ▸Above max pain $15
Catalyst
5.8/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 6.7 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 6.5 |
- ▸Strong earnings: 3B/1M
How the verdict was assembled
Engine trigger
Multiple concerning factors. Consider reducing position.
Engine technical detail
verdict_path:
L4:PATH_F_SELLPassed (7)
- MOMENTUM:6.3>=5.5
- INSIDER:OK
- 8K:CLEAN
- NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
- EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:41d clear
- SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
- MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (1)
- ASYMMETRY:-0.3=NEGATIVE
Warning (0)
none
Reward-to-Risk
-0.32
Upside
-4.8%
Downside
15.0%
Sizing output
AVOID
SetupUNKNOWN — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed
EdgeNO_EDGE — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityMODERATE — Balanced profile
Investment implication
The F-path SELL output reflects an overall score of 4.2 below the 5.6 soft trigger — multiple weakening dimensions accumulated rather than a single hard-floor breach. The strongest dimension ( Growth at 7.1) was not enough to lift the adjusted overall above the threshold. Co-occurring failed gates ( ASYMMETRY:-0.3=NEGATIVE) reinforce the read. Current asymmetry R:R is -0.32 — supplementary context, not the trigger for this path.
The strongest dimensions are Growth at 7.1, Momentum at 6.3, and Sentiment at 6.2; the weakest are Technical at 3.5, Risk (lower is worse) at 4.2, and Peer rank at 5.3. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -0.32 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
What would invalidate the thesis
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
- P1Valvoline generates 25% revenue growth with a 32% return on equity — placing it as both an industry growth leader and a superior ROE performer versus peers — while the PEG ratio of 1.06 suggests the growth premium is fairly valued rather than overpriced.
Trip ifRevenue growth falls below 10% year-over-year for 2 consecutive quarters, more than 15 percentage points below the current 25% level.
- P2The stock has reached its analyst price target with essentially zero upside remaining (-0.4%), while simultaneously carrying a put/call ratio of 4.60 — one of the highest in the portfolio — and 14% short interest, indicating options market participants and short sellers share strong conviction that the stock is overvalued at current levels.
Trip ifPut/call ratio rises above 6.0 or short interest rises above 20%, indicating bearish positioning is intensifying rather than resolving.
- P3The stock is in a recovery pattern with improving MACD and RSI at 75 — but an RSI of 75 is technically overbought, the Bollinger band score is 0.4/10 (near the upper band), and OBV is falling, creating a divergence between the improving trend headline and the deteriorating breadth of the move.
Trip ifRSI falls below 40 within 60 days, indicating the recovery pattern has reversed into a downtrend rather than a healthy consolidation.
- P4The risk score of 2.7 is below the 3.0 minimum threshold, driven by 14% short interest, 4.60 put/call ratio, and implied volatility of 88%, creating a risk profile that exceeds the system's tolerance even for an otherwise strong growth story.
Trip ifRisk score falls below 2.0, more than 1.0 below the minimum threshold of 3.0, indicating the risk profile has deteriorated further.