Skip to main content
VRSKVerisk Analytics, Inc.Hold5.2·$179.53-0.30%
VRSK · Why this verdict

Why Verisk Analytics (VRSK) is rated HOLD

Updated

Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Show full disclosure ▾

About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.

Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.

Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.

No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.

No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.

Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.

Methodology · Editorial policy & full disclaimer

VerdictHOLD
Overall score5.2/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis

Engine thesis — one sentence

Verisk Analytics is a best-in-class data analytics franchise for U.S. property and casualty insurers, with a perfect 4-quarter earnings beat streak, operating margins of 29%, and a Piotroski F-Score of 8/9, but the stock's near-term appeal is constrained by thin 10% upside to analyst targets, a confirmed downtrend, and heavy customer concentration in a single end market.

Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.

Thesis pillars

Verisk generates operating margins of 29% — best in class among consulting and data analytics peers — supported by a quality score of 8.0, strong return on assets, and gross margins in the top 10% of the universe.

Stable
Quality breakdown
Expectation
Operating margins should remain above 27% over the next 12 months, maintaining the premium margin profile that justifies the higher-than-sector valuation multiple.

CounterThin revenue growth of approximately 4% limits the ability to expand margins further, and the business relies on a single customer segment — U.S. property and casualty insurers representing 70% of revenue — that could face pricing pressure in a soft insurance cycle.

Over 70% of revenue comes from U.S. property and casualty primary insurers, which is flagged as a high-concentration risk; however, this concentration also reflects deep product integration and high switching costs that make relationships durable.

Stable
Bear case
Expectation
Revenue from the property and casualty insurance segment should grow at least 3% annually, in line with the broader insurance sector, over the next 12 months.

CounterIf the U.S. P&C insurance market enters a hard underwriting cycle that reduces insurer premiums and IT budgets, Verisk has no diversified revenue base to absorb the impact.

Verisk has beaten earnings estimates in all 4 of the last 4 quarters, with an average positive surprise of 6.2% and consistent beats ranging from 0.96% to 12.92%, demonstrating disciplined financial guidance and reliable execution.

Stable
Catalyst breakdown
Expectation
The beat streak should extend to at least 6 consecutive quarters, with earnings per share continuing to grow and surprise positive in at least 3 of the next 4 reporting periods.

CounterA 6.2% average beat may reflect consistently conservative guidance rather than fundamental outperformance, and any reset of guidance expectations could end the streak without underlying business deterioration.

Despite a recovery setup with improving MACD and RSI at 64, the stock's 200-day moving average is declining at -6.8% over 30 days, and the death cross condition has been flagged — creating a technical headwind that delayed the entry case despite strong fundamentals.

Stable
Gates warning
Expectation
The 200-day moving average slope should flatten and turn positive within 6 months, and the stock should hold above $175, roughly 3% below the current $180, confirming the recovery setup is intact.

CounterThe quality and momentum exemption that waived the death cross gate does not eliminate the underlying price trend; if the stock breaks below $168 support, the recovery thesis fails.

Per-dimension breakdown

Value

4.8/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
P/E4.7
P/S5.1
EV/EBITDA1.0
Fwd P/E6.2
PEG4.8
Analyst target6.0
  • Forward P/E: 20.7x
  • PEG: 1.75

Quality

8.0/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
ROA10.0
Gross margin10.0
Op margin10.0
Net margin10.0
Current ratio4.1
FCF quality7.2
Moat5.9
Rule of 405.5
Piotroski F8.9
  • Strong margins: 29%
  • Strong Piotroski F-Score: 8/9
  • High-quality business

Growth

3.2/10data confidence 67%
ComponentSub-score
Rev growth3.5
EPS growth3.0

Momentum

4.3/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
RSI4.5
MACD0.8
OBV10.0
MA position6.0
Volume0.0
  • Volume accumulation (rising OBV)
  • Below 200-MA, MA slope -6.4%/30d — confirmed downtrend

Sentiment

7.1/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
Analyst rating7.4
Price target7.9
erm sentiment5.8
  • Analyst upside: 22%

Insider

5.1/10data confidence 50%
ComponentSub-score
materiality5.0
holder change5.2
  • Insider selling (low materiality) — $3,066,154 (0.013% of mkt cap)

Peer rank

4.3/10data confidence 80%
ComponentSub-score
value rank0.7
quality rank8.6
growth rank2.9
  • Best-in-class margins

Technical

2.5/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
bollinger3.7
support resistance2.5
52w position1.3

Risk (lower is worse)

5.1/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
short interest6.3
days to cover6.5
volatility4.8
put call0.0
implied vol6.1
max pain risk3.0
beta8.8
  • Elevated put/call: 3.67
  • Above max pain $150
  • Concentration risks: 1 HIGH (10-K Item 1A — sized via position_sizing, validated via buy_confidence)

Catalyst

6.8/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
erm6.5
earnings history10.0
earnings timing5.0
surprise avg5.6
dividend safety7.0
  • Perfect beat streak: 4Q
  • Dividend: 111.0%

How the verdict was assembled

Engine trigger

Multiple concerning factors. Consider reducing position. | News modifier +1 (SELL_IF_HOLDING → HOLD_IF_HOLDING).

Engine technical detail
verdict_path: L4:PATH_F_SELL|L3:NEWS_MOD=+1
Passed (6)
  • INSIDER:OK
  • 8K:CLEAN
  • NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
  • EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:33d clear
  • SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
  • MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (3)
  • MOMENTUM:4.3<4.5
  • ASYMMETRY:1.4<1.5@spot
  • DEATH_CROSS:HARD_BLOCK
Warning (0)

none

Reward-to-Risk
1.44
Upside
+9.9%
Downside
6.9%
Sizing output
AVOID

SetupRANGE_BOUND RSI 51 mid-range, Bollinger mid-band

EdgeNO_EDGE No clear edge identified

SuitabilityMODERATE Balanced profile

Investment implication

The F-path SELL output reflects an overall score of 5.2 below the 5.4 soft trigger — multiple weakening dimensions accumulated rather than a single hard-floor breach. The strongest dimension ( Quality at 8.0) was not enough to lift the adjusted overall above the threshold. Co-occurring failed gates ( MOMENTUM:4.3<4.5, ASYMMETRY:1.4<1.5@spot, DEATH_CROSS:HARD_BLOCK) reinforce the read. Current asymmetry R:R is 1.44 — supplementary context, not the trigger for this path.

The strongest dimensions are Quality at 8.0, Sentiment at 7.1, and Catalyst at 6.8; the weakest are Technical at 2.5, Growth at 3.2, and Peer rank at 4.3. The V9 engine flagged 3 failed gates, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 1.44 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.

What would invalidate the thesis

Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.

  • P1Verisk has beaten earnings estimates in all 4 of the last 4 quarters, with an average positive surprise of 6.2% and consistent beats ranging from 0.96% to 12.92%, demonstrating disciplined financial guidance and reliable execution.

    Trip ifEPS surprise falls below 0% in at least 3 of the next 4 quarters.

  • P2Verisk generates operating margins of 29% — best in class among consulting and data analytics peers — supported by a quality score of 8.0, strong return on assets, and gross margins in the top 10% of the universe.

    Trip ifOperating margin falls below 25%, more than 4 percentage points below the current 29% level, for 2 consecutive quarters.

  • P3Over 70% of revenue comes from U.S. property and casualty primary insurers, which is flagged as a high-concentration risk; however, this concentration also reflects deep product integration and high switching costs that make relationships durable.

    Trip ifRevenue growth from the P&C insurance segment declines to below 0% for 2 consecutive quarters.

  • P4Despite a recovery setup with improving MACD and RSI at 64, the stock's 200-day moving average is declining at -6.8% over 30 days, and the death cross condition has been flagged — creating a technical headwind that delayed the entry case despite strong fundamentals.

    Trip ifStock price falls below $168, more than 7% below the current $180.46, and the 200-day moving average slope remains negative after 90 days.

Engine reasoning is mechanically derived from pipeline gate outputs. See decision view.

Home Stocks VRSK Why this verdict