Value
7.2/10data confidence 83%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 10.0 |
| EV/EBITDA | 5.4 |
| Fwd P/E | 7.7 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 3.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 15.9x
- ▸PEG: 0.03
- ▸Attractively valued
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
United Natural Foods has beaten or matched earnings estimates in 3 of the last 4 quarters with improving surprises, but carries a quality score of only 1.7 out of 10 — far below the minimum 4.0 floor — with no competitive moat and declining revenues, making any investment case contingent on sustained earnings recovery.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
UNFI's quality score of 1.7 out of 10 is among the lowest in the dataset, with no competitive moat, a Piotroski F-Score of only 4.4 out of 9, and zero scoring on ROE and gross margin, indicating a structurally weak business with limited pricing power in food distribution. Quality breakdown | Quality score rises above 4.0 within 12 months as margin improvement and debt reduction programs take effect | →Stable |
| CounterFood distribution is a structurally low-margin industry, and recent earnings beats suggest management is executing margin improvement actions that could gradually lift quality metrics even if the overall scores remain below sector leaders | ||
Revenue is declining at negative 4% year-over-year and growth scores at 1.4 out of 10 — near the bottom of the scale — indicating that the business is not generating top-line expansion and is relying entirely on margin improvement for the earnings recovery narrative. Growth breakdown | Revenue growth turns positive year-over-year within 12 months, moving the growth score above 3.0 out of 10 | →Stable |
| CounterImproving earnings surprises despite declining revenue demonstrate effective cost control; positive earnings momentum without revenue growth can still support the share price if margins are expanding | ||
UNFI has beaten earnings estimates in 3 of the last 4 quarters with improving positive surprises — 38% in September 2025, 40% in December 2025, and 23% in March 2026 — suggesting a genuine operational recovery underway in the food distribution business. Earnings | Earnings surprise stays positive in at least 3 of the next 4 quarters, sustaining the recovery trend | →Stable |
| CounterRevenue is declining at negative 4% year-over-year, and the most recent quarter was an in-line result rather than a beat, which may signal the recovery is maturing rather than accelerating | ||
The put/call ratio of 1.80 combined with an asymmetry ratio of -0.98 (negative upside of -14.7%) means the stock already trades above any reasonable short-term target, and options market participants are positioned more bearishly than bullishly. Options | Price corrects below $45, more than 10% below the current $50.33, before the risk-reward becomes favorable for a new position | →Stable |
| CounterStrong OBV accumulation and price above the 200-day moving average suggest the market has already incorporated the earnings recovery narrative; a pullback to $45 may not occur if the recovery continues | ||
CounterFood distribution is a structurally low-margin industry, and recent earnings beats suggest management is executing margin improvement actions that could gradually lift quality metrics even if the overall scores remain below sector leaders
CounterImproving earnings surprises despite declining revenue demonstrate effective cost control; positive earnings momentum without revenue growth can still support the share price if margins are expanding
CounterRevenue is declining at negative 4% year-over-year, and the most recent quarter was an in-line result rather than a beat, which may signal the recovery is maturing rather than accelerating
CounterStrong OBV accumulation and price above the 200-day moving average suggest the market has already incorporated the earnings recovery narrative; a pullback to $45 may not occur if the recovery continues
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 10.0 |
| EV/EBITDA | 5.4 |
| Fwd P/E | 7.7 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 3.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 0.0 |
| ROA | 1.5 |
| Gross margin | 0.0 |
| Op margin | 0.4 |
| Net margin | 0.0 |
| Current ratio | 5.0 |
| Moat | 2.5 |
| Piotroski F | 4.4 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 1.4 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 5.5 |
| MACD | 2.8 |
| OBV | 1.0 |
| MA position | 6.0 |
| Volume | 0.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 6.8 |
| Price target | 4.6 |
| erm sentiment | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 5.1 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 8.0 |
| quality rank | 0.0 |
| growth rank | 0.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 5.5 |
| support resistance | 3.7 |
| 52w position | 7.8 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 6.8 |
| days to cover | 5.5 |
| volatility | 0.0 |
| put call | 8.2 |
| implied vol | 3.8 |
| max pain risk | 3.0 |
| beta | 8.1 |
| debt equity | 3.1 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 10.0 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 10.0 |
Quality below minimum threshold.
L1:HARD_BLOCKnone
SetupRANGE_BOUND — RSI 45 mid-range, Bollinger mid-band
EdgeNO_EDGE — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityAGGRESSIVE — MCap $3.1B<$5B
The L1 gate blocked the positive-verdict path: a hard-floor threshold was breached, so dimensional pillars — including Catalyst at 7.5 could not lift the engine output above the verdict floor. Failed gate signal: MOMENTUM:3.1<4.5.
The strongest dimensions are Catalyst at 7.5, Value at 7.2, and Technical at 5.7; the weakest are Growth at 1.4, Quality at 1.7, and Momentum at 3.1. The V9 engine flagged 2 failed gates, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -1.03 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifQuality score stays below 2.5 for more than 3 consecutive quarters without improvement
Trip ifEPS surprise falls below 0% in at least 3 of the next 4 quarters, ending the recovery trend
Trip ifRevenue declines by more than 8% year-over-year for 2 consecutive quarters
Trip ifPut/call ratio rises above 2.5 or price drops below $46.81 stop-loss level, more than 7% below current $50.33