Value
7.0/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 6.6 |
| P/S | 9.8 |
| EV/EBITDA | 6.2 |
| Fwd P/E | 7.6 |
| PEG | 8.1 |
| Analyst target | 4.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 16.3x
- ▸PEG: 0.82
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
UFP Industries trades at an attractive forward multiple of 15.4x with a PEG of 0.78, but persistent earnings misses across all four recent quarters and negative free cash flow quality undermine the value thesis and require earnings improvement before the discount narrows.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
With upside of only 5.9% against a downside of 8.4%, the reward-to-risk ratio of 1.09 is far below the minimum threshold of 1.5 required for an asymmetric entry, making current price levels unfavorable for new positions. Targets | Price falls to an entry level where upside exceeds 15% against comparable downside, restoring a favorable risk-reward ratio above 1.5 | →Stable |
| CounterAnalyst consensus still implies 22% upside to the price target, which would improve the asymmetry ratio if the stock corrects to a lower entry level | ||
UFP Industries has missed earnings estimates in every one of the last four quarters, with an average shortfall of 16.7%, indicating that the business is consistently delivering below analyst expectations. Earnings | Earnings surprise turns positive in at least 2 of the next 4 quarters, reducing the miss streak | →Stable |
| CounterDeclining revenue of -8% and below-average quality scores suggest the miss pattern reflects genuine fundamental deterioration rather than overly optimistic estimates | ||
The stock trades at a forward P/E of 15.4x with a PEG of 0.78, suggesting the market is pricing in below-trend growth expectations that may overstate the downside if revenue stabilizes. Valuation breakdown | Revenue decline narrows toward flat year-over-year within 12 months, supporting re-rating toward peer multiples | →Stable |
| CounterDeclining revenue of -8% year-over-year and quality score of 3.9 below the minimum threshold mean the low multiple may be warranted rather than a discount to fair value | ||
The put/call ratio of 2.67 and implied volatility of 83% signal that options market participants are positioned heavily for further downside, representing a meaningful sentiment overhang on the stock. Options | Put/call ratio falls below 1.5 as earnings stabilize and bearish hedging activity unwinds over 12 months | →Stable |
| CounterElevated put/call ratios can persist or worsen when fundamental deterioration continues, and the stock is already trading above max pain at $75 | ||
CounterAnalyst consensus still implies 22% upside to the price target, which would improve the asymmetry ratio if the stock corrects to a lower entry level
CounterDeclining revenue of -8% and below-average quality scores suggest the miss pattern reflects genuine fundamental deterioration rather than overly optimistic estimates
CounterDeclining revenue of -8% year-over-year and quality score of 3.9 below the minimum threshold mean the low multiple may be warranted rather than a discount to fair value
CounterElevated put/call ratios can persist or worsen when fundamental deterioration continues, and the stock is already trading above max pain at $75
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 6.6 |
| P/S | 9.8 |
| EV/EBITDA | 6.2 |
| Fwd P/E | 7.6 |
| PEG | 8.1 |
| Analyst target | 4.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 2.8 |
| ROA | 3.4 |
| Gross margin | 0.0 |
| Op margin | 1.7 |
| Net margin | 2.2 |
| Current ratio | 8.4 |
| FCF quality | 4.6 |
| Moat | 4.6 |
| Piotroski F | 7.8 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 0.4 |
| EPS growth | 6.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 2.7 |
| MACD | 10.0 |
| OBV | 1.0 |
| MA position | 6.0 |
| Volume | 0.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
| Price target | 6.8 |
| erm sentiment | 6.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 5.1 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 5.8 |
| quality rank | 5.0 |
| growth rank | 2.5 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 0.0 |
| support resistance | 0.0 |
| 52w position | 5.6 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 8.2 |
| days to cover | 8.2 |
| volatility | 5.1 |
| put call | 9.2 |
| implied vol | 5.3 |
| beta | 6.0 |
| debt equity | 9.5 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 6.5 |
| earnings history | 0.0 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 0.0 |
| dividend safety | 7.0 |
Quality below minimum threshold.
L1:HARD_BLOCKSetupRECOVERY — Death cross but MACD improving, RSI 74
EdgeNO_EDGE — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityMODERATE — Balanced profile
The L1 gate blocked the positive-verdict path: a hard-floor threshold was breached, so dimensional pillars — including Risk (lower is worse) at 7.4 could not lift the engine output above the verdict floor. Failed gate signal: MOMENTUM:3.9<4.5.
The strongest dimensions are Risk (lower is worse) at 7.4, Value at 7.0, and Sentiment at 5.9; the weakest are Technical at 1.9, Growth at 3.2, and Catalyst at 3.7. The V9 engine flagged 3 failed gates with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -0.15 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifEPS surprise falls below -10% in at least 3 of the next 4 quarters, continuing the miss streak
Trip ifRevenue growth declines by more than 10% year-over-year for 2 or more consecutive quarters
Trip ifPut/call ratio rises above 3.5 or implied volatility exceeds 100%
Trip ifPrice rises above $92 without earnings improvement, pushing upside below 0% against the analyst target