oral dabogratinib
“10-K Item 1: 'Our lead program, oral dabogratinib, was designed to be more selective for FGFR3 over FGFR1, FGFR2, and FGFR4 to minimize off-target side effects'”
Updated
The most significant concentration Tyra Biosciences discloses is oral dabogratinib, classified HIGH by disclosed size. Below: the full set from the latest 10-K — verbatim quotes, filing references, and a synthesis of what these exposures mean together.
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
Source: Tyra Biosciences’s SEC Form 10-K filed — view the filing on SEC EDGAR ↗
Each card carries a disclosed-size chip (HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW — how large the exposure is as a share of revenue, not how dangerous it is) and a nature tag: Built-in(the company’s own model, geography, or products) or Outside party (an external customer, supplier, or distributor it relies on).
“10-K Item 1: 'Our lead program, oral dabogratinib, was designed to be more selective for FGFR3 over FGFR1, FGFR2, and FGFR4 to minimize off-target side effects'”
“10-K Item 1A: 'We rely on third parties for the manufacture of our product candidates for preclinical and clinical development.'”
The company's concentration profile is characteristic of a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company: both disclosed exposures carry high disclosed size, and neither is yet revenue-generating. The lead program, oral dabogratinib, was designed as a selective FGFR3 inhibitor and represents a high-share mixed exposure — the company's near-term value creation depends substantially on its clinical and regulatory outcome, making this both a structural feature of the company's stage of development and a concentrated bet on a single mechanism and indication. The mixed character reflects that success is partly within the company's control through trial design and execution, and partly dependent on external regulatory and clinical outcomes. The manufacturing dependency compounds the pipeline concentration. The company relies on third parties for the manufacture of its product candidates for preclinical and clinical development, a high-share dependency in character, since there is no disclosed in-house manufacturing capability and disruptions to third-party contract manufacturers would affect the company's ability to advance studies. The combination of a single lead asset and a fully outsourced supply chain for that asset means that the two concentrations are tightly coupled — a manufacturing disruption translates directly into program-timeline risk for the lead program. On balance, this profile is consistent with an early-stage company where both the upside and the risk are concentrated in one pipeline program and one supply arrangement.
For the engine’s reasoning on TYRA’s current verdict — including which dimensions drove the score — see the per-dimension breakdown.
| Symbol | Name | HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACAD | ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| TYRA● | Tyra Biosciences, Inc. | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| ACLX | Arcellx, Inc. | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| AGIO | Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| ALMS | Alumis Inc. | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| ADMA | ADMA Biologics Inc | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Concentration counts reflect items disclosed in each peer’s most recent 10-K; disclosed-size classification uses TrendMatrix’s internal 10-K extraction taxonomy.